J&K&L High Court: Maternity Leave is a Constitutional Right and Cannot be Treated as State Charity  ||  P&H High Court: Second Anticipatory Bail Plea is Not Maintainable After Supreme Court Rejection  ||  Bombay High Court: No Prior Sanction is Required to Prosecute Police For Custodial Assault  ||  Allahabad High Court: Strict Proof of Marriage is Unnecessary if Couple Lived as Husband and Wife  ||  Delhi High Court: UP Passport Disputes Cannot be Filed in Delhi Only Because MEA is Based There  ||  Bombay High Court: Revenue Officers Cannot Decide Caste Status to Remove Tribal Land Protections  ||  Calcutta High Court: Punjab National Bank Liable to Compensate Farmers For Crop Insurance Lapse  ||  Calcutta High Court: Joint Settlement of Liquor Licence is Allowed if All Eligible Heirs Consent  ||  Delhi High Court Holds Multiple Sclerosis is a Specified Disability under the RPWD Act  ||  Allahabad High Court: An Alibi Must be Proved at Trial and Cannot be Accepted by the IO Alone    

R. v. Simpson - (30 Jul 2015)

Supreme Court deliberates on 'colour of right'

MANU/SCCN/0036/2015

Criminal

The Supreme Court, elaborating on a "remarkably short" trial court analysis, held that the evidentional foundation establishing colour of right was suspect. It noted that even if the 'colour of right' defence could advance a subjective expectation, the Respondents had to show that the expectation was objectively reasonable. The Court remanded the matter for fresh trial.

Tags : CANADA   CRIMINAL   COLOUR OF RIGHT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved