Supreme Court: SC/ST Act Does Not Apply to Alleged Casteist Abuse Inside a Private House  ||  Supreme Court: Frictionless Relationship Between the Bar and the Bench Strengthens Justice Delivery  ||  Delhi High Court: Eviction From Jhuggis With Rehabilitation Does Not Violate Article 21  ||  Madras HC: Courts Cannot Remain Silent When Single Disputed Vote Could Determine Government’s Fate  ||  Allahabad HC Blamed State and Police For Delays and Ordered Reforms to Tackle “Tarikh Pe Tarikh”  ||  Supreme Court: Banks Cannot Invoke IBC Against Debtors For Builder-Linked Loans  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Disclosure of Failed Candidates’ Marks Does Not Imply They Passed Exams  ||  Supreme Court: Murder Accused Cannot Inherit Property of the Person Allegedly Killed  ||  Supreme Court: Delay in Deposit Does Not Automatically Cancel Contracts under Specific Relief Act  ||  SC: Railways is Treated as a Consumer under the Electricity Act, Not a Distribution Licensee    

Tata Sons vs Cyrus Mistry Case: NCLAT Questions Language of NCLT Judgment - (09 Aug 2018)

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has questioned if the National Company Law Tribunal's (NCLT's) Mumbai Bench had written a biased order in Cyrus Mistry versus Tata Sons case.

Tags : NCLT   CYRUS MISTRY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved