Bombay HC: Clarifies Procedure for Executing Foreign Decrees  ||  Supreme Court: Bureaucratic Delay No Excuse  ||  Supreme Court Grants Full Disability Pension Arrears to Veterans  ||  Delhi HC: Workman Cannot Claim Section 17(B) of the ID Act Wages after Reaching Superannuation Age  ||  Allahabad HC: Caste by Birth Remains Unchanged Despite Conversion or Inter-Caste Marriage  ||  Delhi High Court: Tweeting Corruption Allegations Against Employer Can Constitute Misconduct  ||  Delhi High Court: State Gratuity Authorities Lack Jurisdiction over Multi-State Establishments  ||  Kerala High Court: Arrest Grounds Need Not Mention Contraband Quantity When No Seizure is Made  ||  SC: Silence During Investigation Does Not Ipso Facto Mean Non-Cooperation to Deny Bail  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Re-Examine Answer Keys Even in Judicial Service Exams    

Tata Sons vs Cyrus Mistry Case: NCLAT Questions Language of NCLT Judgment - (09 Aug 2018)

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has questioned if the National Company Law Tribunal's (NCLT's) Mumbai Bench had written a biased order in Cyrus Mistry versus Tata Sons case.

Tags : NCLT   CYRUS MISTRY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved