Allahabad HC Grants Bail to AMU Professor Accused of Linking Rape to Hindu Scriptures  ||  Supreme Court Vacates Stay on Telangana HC Order Quashing Nomination of 2 MLCs  ||  Supreme Court: Place of Exclusive Jurisdiction Deemed as 'Seat' of Arbitration  ||  Allahabad HC: NCMEI Has Exclusive Power to Grant Minority Status  ||  P&H HC: Default Bail Can Be Granted by Magistrate/Sessions Court Even If Bail Plea Pending Before HC  ||  Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to AMU Professor Over Alleged Rape  ||  All HC: Don't Remand Accused to Custody If Chargesheet Filed Sans Arrest  ||  HP High Court: Trial Court Can’t Dictate Investigation Manner, If Remand Purpose Is Clear  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Signatories Have No Right to Attend Arbitration Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: 'Gender-Neutral' Often Misunderstood As 'Gender Equality'    

Conviction Cannot Be Based Solely On Co-Accused’s ‘Confessional Statement’: Supreme Court - (01 Aug 2018)

Supreme Court has held that conviction under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, cannot be based solely on the confessional statement of a co-accused, in the absence of a substantive piece of evidence.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   NARCOTICS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved