SC: Repeated Anticipatory Bail Pleas Abuse Process and Reduce Litigation to a Gamble || Supreme Court: State Officers Cannot Back Litigants Through Affidavits Against the Law || Supreme Court: Accused Deserves Parity With Discharged Co-Accused if Evidence is Not Stronger || SC Allows Euthanasia of Rabid Stray Dogs if Necessary and Protects Officials Acting in Good Faith || Kerala High Court: University Syndicate Cannot Sue Chancellor as Both Form Same Legal Body || Kerala High Court: Unsigned FIS is Admissible if Informant Confirms its Contents in Court || J&K&L High Court: Purchaser’s Structure on Migrant Land Alone Cannot Block Sale Deed Registration || Supreme Court: Bail Remains the Rule and Jail the Exception, Even under the UAPA Law || Supreme Court: Principle of Res Judicata Also Applies Between Stages of the Same Case || Supreme Court: Govt Servant Has No Right to Old Rule Promotion Just Due to Earlier Vacancies

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu - (High Court of Madras) (16 Oct 2015)

Madras High Court grants bail to Subhiksha founder

Criminal

Madras High Court granted bail to ‘Subhiksha’ founder R. Subramaniam, on the condition of fulfillment of a bail bond and sureties. The Court had previously dismissed a petition seeking anticipatory bail, after which Subramaniam had been taken into custody, though whether he surrendered or was arrested while attempting to escape from Chennai remained unclear. Noting that the Central Bureau of Investigation had not called for Subramanian’s custodial interrogation, prosecution’s case against bail was held to not be maintainable.

Tags : SUBRAMANIAN SUBHIKSHA BAIL GRANT

Share :