SC: POCSO Guilt Presumption Not Absolute, Acquits Accused || Supreme Court: Promotion Cannot Be Claimed as a Vested Right under Repealed Rules || Supreme Court: Promotion Cannot Be Claimed as a Vested Right under Repealed Rules || SC: Unexplained 5-Day Sample Custody Gap Breached S.52A, Acquits 2 after 20 Years || P&H High Court: Illegal Search Alone Does Not Justify Quashing of Complaint under PNDT Act || Bom HC: Creating WhatsApp Group Without Employer's Permission Not Ground for Compulsory Retirement || Madras HC: Lack of Son’s Moral Support Alone Cannot Sustain Father’s Maintenance Claim under CrPC || Kerala HC: University Professor doesn't Occupy 'Public Office', Quo Warranto Not Maintainable || Bombay HC Allows Cutting of 1,237 Mangroves for Connector Bridge in Mumbai’s Western Suburbs || Calcutta HC Orders Return of 3-Year-Old to Adoptive Couple, he wasn't Abandoned

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu - (High Court of Madras) (16 Oct 2015)

Madras High Court grants bail to Subhiksha founder

Criminal

Madras High Court granted bail to ‘Subhiksha’ founder R. Subramaniam, on the condition of fulfillment of a bail bond and sureties. The Court had previously dismissed a petition seeking anticipatory bail, after which Subramaniam had been taken into custody, though whether he surrendered or was arrested while attempting to escape from Chennai remained unclear. Noting that the Central Bureau of Investigation had not called for Subramanian’s custodial interrogation, prosecution’s case against bail was held to not be maintainable.

Tags : SUBRAMANIAN SUBHIKSHA BAIL GRANT

Share :