Kerala High Court: ED Can Investigate Without FIR in Scheduled Offence Cases (CMRL Matter) || Delhi High Court Upholds TRAI Rule Capping TV Advertisements at 12 Minutes Per Hour || Supreme Court Directs High Courts to Deliver Judgments in 3 Months and Bail Orders in One Day || Supreme Court: Successful Resolution Applicant Cannot Negotiate Further After CoC Approval || Supreme Court: Succession Law Applies, Not Primogeniture, to Ex-Royal’s Private Estate Inheritance || Supreme Court: Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Challenge Arbitrator’s Section 16 Decision || Supreme Court: Sanyasi Status Cannot Be Ground to Reject Land Compensation Claim || Supreme Court: Section 33(1)(a) of Arbitration Act Cannot Alter Nature of Interest in Award || Supreme Court: Society Office Bearers Not Liable for Cheque Dishonour Without Active Business Role || Supreme Court: Asking a Woman to Adjust in Marriage Does Not Amount to Cruelty By In-Laws

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu - (High Court of Madras) (16 Oct 2015)

Madras High Court grants bail to Subhiksha founder

Criminal

Madras High Court granted bail to ‘Subhiksha’ founder R. Subramaniam, on the condition of fulfillment of a bail bond and sureties. The Court had previously dismissed a petition seeking anticipatory bail, after which Subramaniam had been taken into custody, though whether he surrendered or was arrested while attempting to escape from Chennai remained unclear. Noting that the Central Bureau of Investigation had not called for Subramanian’s custodial interrogation, prosecution’s case against bail was held to not be maintainable.

Tags : SUBRAMANIAN SUBHIKSHA BAIL GRANT

Share :