SC: Magistrates Should Not Record Prosecution Evidence in Sessions-Triable Cases || Supreme Court Lays Down Guidelines on Using ITRs to Assess Motor Accident Victims' Income || Supreme Court: Citing AI-Generated Fake Precedents Amounts to Advocate Misconduct || Bombay HC: Horse-Trading Rampant in Maharashtra, FIRs 'Washed' After Switching Sides || Tripura High Court: Senior Citizens Cannot be Penalised For Failing to Follow Cases Online || Delhi High Court: Parent Cannot Gain Advantage by Keeping a Child Against a Foreign Court Order || Allahabad HC: Places of Worship Act Bars Conversion of Religious Character, Not State Acquisition || Jharkhand HC: Single Instance of Mother-In-Law Abusing Daughter-In-Law Does Not Amount to Cruelty || Madras High Court: No Appeal Lies Against E-Court Status or Adjournment Orders || Chhattisgarh HC: Judicial Officer Promotion Cannot be Denied on Complaint Without Disciplinary Action

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu - (High Court of Madras) (16 Oct 2015)

Madras High Court grants bail to Subhiksha founder

Criminal

Madras High Court granted bail to ‘Subhiksha’ founder R. Subramaniam, on the condition of fulfillment of a bail bond and sureties. The Court had previously dismissed a petition seeking anticipatory bail, after which Subramaniam had been taken into custody, though whether he surrendered or was arrested while attempting to escape from Chennai remained unclear. Noting that the Central Bureau of Investigation had not called for Subramanian’s custodial interrogation, prosecution’s case against bail was held to not be maintainable.

Tags : SUBRAMANIAN SUBHIKSHA BAIL GRANT

Share :