Delhi HC: MYAS Not Bound to ‘Rubber-Stamp’ International Federation Choices || AP HC: Fulfilling Rehabilitation Promises to Displaced is State’s Constitutional Obligation || SC: Career Progression to Higher Echelons of Judiciary is Neither a Matter of Right Nor Entitlement || Provisions of Tribunal Reforms Act 2022 Struck Down as Unconstitutional || Madras HC: Repeated Remand Orders U/S 37 A&C Act are Unworkable Without Reversing Merits || Delhi High Court: Unproven Immoral Conduct of a Parent Cannot Influence Child Custody Decisions || Delhi High Court: Counsel Cannot Treat Passovers or Adjournments as an Automatic Right || Delhi HC: Landlord’s Rent Control Act Rights Cannot be Waived by Contract With Tenant || Bom HC: Arbitrator Who Halts Proceedings over Unpaid Revised Fees Effectively Withdraws From Office || SC Holds That if Some Offences Are Quashed On Compromise, The FIR Cannot Continue For Others

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu - (High Court of Madras) (16 Oct 2015)

Madras High Court grants bail to Subhiksha founder

Criminal

Madras High Court granted bail to ‘Subhiksha’ founder R. Subramaniam, on the condition of fulfillment of a bail bond and sureties. The Court had previously dismissed a petition seeking anticipatory bail, after which Subramaniam had been taken into custody, though whether he surrendered or was arrested while attempting to escape from Chennai remained unclear. Noting that the Central Bureau of Investigation had not called for Subramanian’s custodial interrogation, prosecution’s case against bail was held to not be maintainable.

Tags : SUBRAMANIAN SUBHIKSHA BAIL GRANT

Share :