SC: Completed Trial can't be Remanded for Procedural Lapse Unless Prejudice is Proven || SC: Sessions Courts Cannot Bar Statutory Remission and Commutation Through Special Sentences || SC: Article 311 Bar Inapplicable If Removing Officer Equals Appointing Authority in Status || SC: Contractual Bar Prevents Arbitral Tribunal From Awarding Pre-Reference Interest || SC Frames Guidelines to Prevent POCSO Act Misuse by Parents in Custody Disputes || Delhi HC Directs DLSA to Convey Trial Court’s Encouraging Message and Compensation to POCSO Survivor || Delhi HC: Gravity of UAPA Offence Cannot Justify Prolonged PMLA Detention || Delhi HC Affirms Equestrian Federation's Youth Olympics Selection, Calls for Clearer Norms & Timeline || Delhi HC: Ajeet Bharti Used Caste Superiority to Humiliate Chandrashekhar Azad || Supreme Court: Anti-Suit Injunction Cannot Rest on Speculation of Unenforceable Foreign Decree

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu - (High Court of Madras) (16 Oct 2015)

Madras High Court grants bail to Subhiksha founder

Criminal

Madras High Court granted bail to ‘Subhiksha’ founder R. Subramaniam, on the condition of fulfillment of a bail bond and sureties. The Court had previously dismissed a petition seeking anticipatory bail, after which Subramaniam had been taken into custody, though whether he surrendered or was arrested while attempting to escape from Chennai remained unclear. Noting that the Central Bureau of Investigation had not called for Subramanian’s custodial interrogation, prosecution’s case against bail was held to not be maintainable.

Tags : SUBRAMANIAN SUBHIKSHA BAIL GRANT

Share :