Supreme Court: Bail Remains the Rule and Jail the Exception, Even under the UAPA Law || Supreme Court: Principle of Res Judicata Also Applies Between Stages of the Same Case || Supreme Court: Govt Servant Has No Right to Old Rule Promotion Just Due to Earlier Vacancies || Delhi High Court: Students Having Zero Attendance Cannot be Promoted to the Next Semester || J&K&L HC: Replacing 'State' With 'Union Territory' in Public Safety Act Does Not Change its Nature || Kerala High Court: Doctor Cannot Enrol as an Advocate Without First Cancelling Medical Registration || Supreme Court: VAT is Not Applicable on Reliance’s Inter-State Gas Supply from KG Basin to UP || Supreme Court: Co-Owner Can File Eviction Suit as Landlord under Bombay Rent Act || Supreme Court: Mediclaim Reimbursement Cannot be Set off Against Accident Compensation || SC: Hindu Succession Act 2005 Amendment Does Not Curtail Daughters’ Existing Inheritance Rights

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu - (High Court of Madras) (16 Oct 2015)

Madras High Court grants bail to Subhiksha founder

Criminal

Madras High Court granted bail to ‘Subhiksha’ founder R. Subramaniam, on the condition of fulfillment of a bail bond and sureties. The Court had previously dismissed a petition seeking anticipatory bail, after which Subramaniam had been taken into custody, though whether he surrendered or was arrested while attempting to escape from Chennai remained unclear. Noting that the Central Bureau of Investigation had not called for Subramanian’s custodial interrogation, prosecution’s case against bail was held to not be maintainable.

Tags : SUBRAMANIAN SUBHIKSHA BAIL GRANT

Share :