Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal, Holds Investigating Officer Cannot Create Evidence || Supreme Court: NDPS Prosecution Cannot Be Quashed Solely Over Co-Accused’s Disclosure || SC: Tax Classification Depends on Goods' Form at Sale, not their End Use || Delhi High Court: No Material Showing Delhi Police Compromised the 2020 Riots Probe || Madras HC Suggests Mandatory Attachment of Properties Suspected to Be Proceeds of Corruption || P&H High Court: Demolition After Lawyer Flagged Corruption Appears Aimed at Silencing Him || Calcutta High Court: Contempt Proceedings Cannot Be Used to Challenge Orders or Attack Judges || Orissa High Court: Marriage Need Not Be Preserved When the Relationship Has Substantially Eroded || SC: CIRP Can Continue Despite Fraudulent Insolvency Plea That Triggered It || Delhi HC: Senior Citizen May Seek Eviction of Daughter-in-Law for Ill-Treatment

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu - (High Court of Madras) (16 Oct 2015)

Madras High Court grants bail to Subhiksha founder

Criminal

Madras High Court granted bail to ‘Subhiksha’ founder R. Subramaniam, on the condition of fulfillment of a bail bond and sureties. The Court had previously dismissed a petition seeking anticipatory bail, after which Subramaniam had been taken into custody, though whether he surrendered or was arrested while attempting to escape from Chennai remained unclear. Noting that the Central Bureau of Investigation had not called for Subramanian’s custodial interrogation, prosecution’s case against bail was held to not be maintainable.

Tags : SUBRAMANIAN SUBHIKSHA BAIL GRANT

Share :