Supreme Court Allows Cross-Examination on Brand Use Despite Written Statement Not Being on Record  ||  Supreme Court: Enquiry Needed Before Dismissal for Suppressing Criminal Antecedents  ||  Supreme Court: Trading While Holding Confidential Information Indicates Insider Trading  ||  Supreme Court Explains Four-Step Test to Quash Criminal Cases Using Defence Material  ||  Supreme Court Acquits Man in Minor Rape Case, Flags HC's Medical Evidence Lapse  ||  Bombay HC: Minor’s Inability to Describe Sexual Act No Ground to Reject Her Testimony  ||  Delhi HC: Wife’s Interim Maintenance Cannot be Based Solely on Husband’s Income  ||  Calcutta HC: SLSA Cannot Adopt ‘Big Brother’ Approach Over Adult Victims’ Compensation  ||  Allahabad HC: Further Investigation Permissible Even After Final Report is Accepted  ||  Allahabad HC: Court-Directed Award Cannot be Challenged for Not Computing Market Value    

Person Falsely Implicated by State in Criminal Case Deserves to be Compensated: Madhya Pradesh HC - (10 Jul 2018)

Madhya Pradesh High Court has observed that if because of poor investigation and tainted prosecution, the accused suffers and it is apparent that he is innocent then he deserves compensation from the state under Right to Life.

Tags : MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT   RIGHT TO LIFE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved