Karnataka HC: Can’t Provide Free Bus Service to Enable Voters to Reach Polling Booth  ||  Gau. HC Declares Levy of Court Fee at the rate of 7% for Grant of Probate as Unconstitutional  ||  Cal. HC: Can’t Say Retracted Statement to be Involuntary Without Being Examined by Court  ||  Supreme Court: Union Directed to Deport 17 Foreigners in Assam’s Transit Camps  ||  Recommendations Made by Gujarat HC for Promotions of Judicial Officers Upheld by Supreme Court  ||  SC: Can’t Charge Friends/Relative for Offence of Bigamy by Mere Presence in Second Marriage  ||  ICAI Rule Limiting Number of Tax Audits by Chartered Accountants Every Year Upheld by Supreme Court  ||  Supreme Court Explains 7 Sub-Rights that Must be Protected by State During Land Acquisition  ||  SC: Accused Can’t be Arrested by ED After Special Court has Taken Cognizance of PMLA Complaint  ||  SC: Employees Filing Writ Petitions Against Air India After its Privatisation, Not Maintainable    

Faridabad Bar Association Bars Outstation Lawyers from Appearing in Courts Sans Local Counsel - (22 Jun 2018)

Civil

The District Bar Association of Faridabad has passed a resolution barring all out station advocates from appearing in any court without local counsel. The resolution was passed citing inconvenience caused to lawyers at the Faridabad District Bar who remain uninformed about the matters which adversely affects their work.

“It has been observed by the executive members that advocates appearing from outstations without local counsel cause inconvenience to members of the District Bar Association as the matters go uninformed and the same also results in loss of work to our fellow advocates”, said the resolution. “It has, therefore, been resolved in the executive meeting…that advocates from out stations will not be allowed to appear before any court of law unless accompanied by local counsel,” added the resolution passed by the District Bar Association, Faridabad.

On the right of the Bar Association to pass such a resolution, Secretary of Faridabad District Bar Association, Mr. Joginder Narwat, said that it has the right to do so as it was acting pursuant to the directions of the Supreme Court. It is to be noted that in 2016 the Supreme Court of India, in case of Jamshed Ansari vs. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad and Ors, had upheld the validity of Rules 3 and 3A of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 which says that an Advocate, who is not on the Roll of Advocate or the Bar Council of the State, is not allowed to appear, act or plead in the said Court unless he files an appointment along with the advocate who is on the Roll of such State Bar Council and is ordinarily practicing in that court.

In India, Bar Council of India regulates the legal profession and High Courts are empowered to frame Rules in this regard.

Tags : FARIDABAD BAR ASSOCIATION   OUTSTATION LAWYERS   LITIGATION   PRACTICE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved