Bombay HC: Clarifies Procedure for Executing Foreign Decrees  ||  Supreme Court: Bureaucratic Delay No Excuse  ||  Supreme Court Grants Full Disability Pension Arrears to Veterans  ||  Delhi HC: Workman Cannot Claim Section 17(B) of the ID Act Wages after Reaching Superannuation Age  ||  Allahabad HC: Caste by Birth Remains Unchanged Despite Conversion or Inter-Caste Marriage  ||  Delhi High Court: Tweeting Corruption Allegations Against Employer Can Constitute Misconduct  ||  Delhi High Court: State Gratuity Authorities Lack Jurisdiction over Multi-State Establishments  ||  Kerala High Court: Arrest Grounds Need Not Mention Contraband Quantity When No Seizure is Made  ||  SC: Silence During Investigation Does Not Ipso Facto Mean Non-Cooperation to Deny Bail  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Re-Examine Answer Keys Even in Judicial Service Exams    

Faridabad Bar Association Bars Outstation Lawyers from Appearing in Courts Sans Local Counsel - (22 Jun 2018)

Civil

The District Bar Association of Faridabad has passed a resolution barring all out station advocates from appearing in any court without local counsel. The resolution was passed citing inconvenience caused to lawyers at the Faridabad District Bar who remain uninformed about the matters which adversely affects their work.

“It has been observed by the executive members that advocates appearing from outstations without local counsel cause inconvenience to members of the District Bar Association as the matters go uninformed and the same also results in loss of work to our fellow advocates”, said the resolution. “It has, therefore, been resolved in the executive meeting…that advocates from out stations will not be allowed to appear before any court of law unless accompanied by local counsel,” added the resolution passed by the District Bar Association, Faridabad.

On the right of the Bar Association to pass such a resolution, Secretary of Faridabad District Bar Association, Mr. Joginder Narwat, said that it has the right to do so as it was acting pursuant to the directions of the Supreme Court. It is to be noted that in 2016 the Supreme Court of India, in case of Jamshed Ansari vs. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad and Ors, had upheld the validity of Rules 3 and 3A of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 which says that an Advocate, who is not on the Roll of Advocate or the Bar Council of the State, is not allowed to appear, act or plead in the said Court unless he files an appointment along with the advocate who is on the Roll of such State Bar Council and is ordinarily practicing in that court.

In India, Bar Council of India regulates the legal profession and High Courts are empowered to frame Rules in this regard.

Tags : FARIDABAD BAR ASSOCIATION   OUTSTATION LAWYERS   LITIGATION   PRACTICE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved