NCLAT: Must Admit Application u/s 7 When CD’s OTS Proposal is Rejected  ||  NCLAT: Can’t Recall Order Passed after Considering Materials Important for Determination of Issue  ||  NCLAT: Fresh Limitation Period Commences from Date when CD Signs Balance Sheet  ||  Delhi HC Refuses to Disturb Allotment of Land to Political Parties for Construction of Party Offices  ||  Delhi High Court Allows MP Engineer Rashid to Attend Parliament Session  ||  Kerala High Court: Need Effective Laws to Combat Cyber Bullying  ||  J&K HC: Delay in Considering Detenue’s Representation Breaches Statutory Requirements  ||  AP HC: Mere Acquittal Will Not Confer on Employee Right to Claim Benefit, Including Reinstatement  ||  P&H HC: Search of Pvt. Conveyance in Public Place Requires Compliance of S 41(1) & 42(2) of NDPS Act  ||  AP HC: Insurance Company Can File Execution Petition Only after Paying Compensation to Claimant    

Mohan Singh and Ors. v. The Chairman Railway Board and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (03 Aug 2015)

Divisional Railway Manager a 'factory'

MANU/SC/0829/2015

Labour and Industrial

The Supreme Court held that a canteen at the Divisional Railway Manager, Moradabad was a 'statutory canteen'. With all requirements of a factory save for 'manufacturing' met, the Court determined repair and maintenance of railways wagons sufficiently constituting manufacturing, and termed the DRM a factory under the Factories Act, 1948. In a plea for absorption, the Court allowed existing staff of the canteen to be regularised with the railway.

Relevant : M.M.R. Khan v. Union of India MANU/SC/0173/1990 Kamla Devi v. Laxmi Devi MANU/SC/0410/2000 Ardeshir H. Bhiwandiwala v. State of Bombay MANU/SC/0236/1961 Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi MANU/SC/1918/2006

Tags : RAILWAY   FACTORY   LABOUR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved