SC: Electricity Dues over 2 Years Recoverable only if Shown Continuously as Outstanding  ||  Allahabad HC Criticises UP Govt for Using Goondas Act as a ‘Tool of Oppression’  ||  Gujarat HC: Complaint Made in Good Faith does not Amount to Defamation  ||  Allahabad HC: Bar Association Membership Disputes Are Private, Outside Writ Jurisdiction  ||  P&H HC: Section 147A Income Tax Act Unconstitutional; Legislature Can’t Override Court Findings  ||  Karnataka HC: Refusing to Return Child’s Volleyball, Asking for Parent Not Abetment of Suicide  ||  Can an IBC Resolution Plan Survive the Death of its Proponent? NCLAT Answers  ||  Supreme Court: Rape Conviction Possible Without S.376 Charge if POCSO Case Fails on Age Proof  ||  SC: Mere Long Possession Can't Establish Adverse Possession; Hostile Intent is Required  ||  Supreme Court Finds Gaps in FSSAI’s Proposed Warning Labels for Foods High in Fat, Sugar and Salt    

Authorisation to Sign Pathology Report- (Press Information Bureau) (06 Feb 2018)

MANU/PIBU/0199/2018

Miscellaneous

As per clause (c) of sub-section (2) of Section 15 of IMC Act, 1956, no person other than a doctor having qualification recognized by MCI and registered with MCI/State Medical Council(s) is allowed to practice modern system of medicine or sign or authenticate a medical or fitness certificate or any other certificate required by any law to be signed. Further, Hon'ble Supreme Court of India vide order dated 12.12.2017 in the Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 28529/2010 in the matter of North Gujarat Unit of Association of Self Employed Owners (Paramedical) of Private Pathology Laboratories of Gujarat Vs. North Gujarat Pathologists Association & Ors held that the stand of the Medical Council of India that Laboratory Report can be counter signed only by a registered medical practitioner with a post graduate qualification in pathology is correct".

Tags : PATHOLOGY REPORT   SIGNING OF   AUTHORISATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved