Bombay HC: Judicial Remand Extension Beyond 60 Days Without Hearing, Reasons is Illegal  ||  Telangana HC: Changing Arbitration Venue Without Consent is Legally Perversive  ||  J&K&L HC: Properly Addressed and Sent Notice Deemed Served Under General Clauses Act  ||  Jharkhand HC: Fresh Anticipatory Bail Plea Not Maintainable After Earlier Rejection under S. 482 BNSS  ||  Orissa HC: Res Judicata Principle Doesn’t Apply to Execution Proceedings under Order 21 CPC  ||  Orissa HC: Railways Strictly Liable for Passenger’s Death After Falling From Train  ||  Del. HC: Director Not Individually Liable for Asset Transfer Without Consideration under S.276 IT Act  ||  Delhi HC: No Blanket Protection for Litigants from Counsel’s Negligence  ||  Bombay HC: Board under Mathadi Act Has No Power to Review its Own Orders  ||  Delhi HC: Father Granted Custody When Mother’s Adultery Allegation Includes Neglect    

Authorisation to Sign Pathology Report- (Press Information Bureau) (06 Feb 2018)

MANU/PIBU/0199/2018

Miscellaneous

As per clause (c) of sub-section (2) of Section 15 of IMC Act, 1956, no person other than a doctor having qualification recognized by MCI and registered with MCI/State Medical Council(s) is allowed to practice modern system of medicine or sign or authenticate a medical or fitness certificate or any other certificate required by any law to be signed. Further, Hon'ble Supreme Court of India vide order dated 12.12.2017 in the Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 28529/2010 in the matter of North Gujarat Unit of Association of Self Employed Owners (Paramedical) of Private Pathology Laboratories of Gujarat Vs. North Gujarat Pathologists Association & Ors held that the stand of the Medical Council of India that Laboratory Report can be counter signed only by a registered medical practitioner with a post graduate qualification in pathology is correct".

Tags : PATHOLOGY REPORT   SIGNING OF   AUTHORISATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved