Calcutta HC: Employee Looking for Another Job with Rival Company Isn’t Contrary || Allahabad HC: Can’t Call Hindu Marriage Invalid Only because it Isn’t Registered || Allahabad HC: Can’t Call Hindu Marriage Invalid Only because it Isn’t Registered || Allahabad HC: No Power on Police to Open History-Sheet on Likes or Dislikes || Rajasthan HC Puts Stay on Installation of Dairy Booth Outside Private Residence || Calcutta HC: Cannot Summon Accused to Produce Incriminating Evidence against Himself || Kerala HC Upholds STA’s decision mandating installation of cameras with Fatigue Detection Censors || SC: Executive Instructions Cannot Override Statutory Recruitment Processes || Delhi Lieutenant Governor’s Notification regarding Evidence of Police officers Put on Hold || SC Issues Notice in Plea to Bring Bar Councils under POSH Act

Hardik Bharatbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat & Ors. - (High Court of Gujarat) (01 Oct 2015)

Hardik Patel’s application against sedition order dismissed

Criminal

The Gujarat High Court turned down Hardik Patel’s application to recall a previous order by which the judge had called for an investigation to determine if Patel had committed a cognizable offence. It noted that no mandamus had been issued that the Applicant would be charged, let alone arrested.

Relevant : Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. and others MANU/SC/1166/2013

Tags : HARDIK PATEL SEDITION ACCUSED MANDAMUS COGNIZABLE

Share :