SC: Omitted Relief Barred Despite Liberty to File Fresh Suit under Order 23 || SC: Custodial Confession Alone Cannot Justify Preventive Detention || SC: Failure to Pay Balance Sale Amount Can Lead to EMD Forfeiture under Auction Terms || Gujarat HC: CIC Cannot Order Suo Motu Disclosure of PM Modi’s Degree under RTI Act || MP HC: FIR Cannot Be Quashed Merely for Not Specifying Accused’s Role || MP HC: Joint Family Status Alone Does Not Establish Existence of Joint Family Funds || MP High Court Directs State Bar Council to Frame Stipend Guidelines for Junior Advocates || Allahabad High Court: Hookah Bars cannot Operate in UP; Clean Air Prevails over Trade || P&H HC: High Court’s Inherent Powers Cannot Be Used to Entertain a Second Revision || Delhi HC: Magistrate Must Examine Complainant, Hear Accused Before Taking Cognisance

Hardik Bharatbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat & Ors. - (High Court of Gujarat) (01 Oct 2015)

Hardik Patel’s application against sedition order dismissed

Criminal

The Gujarat High Court turned down Hardik Patel’s application to recall a previous order by which the judge had called for an investigation to determine if Patel had committed a cognizable offence. It noted that no mandamus had been issued that the Applicant would be charged, let alone arrested.

Relevant : Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. and others MANU/SC/1166/2013

Tags : HARDIK PATEL SEDITION ACCUSED MANDAMUS COGNIZABLE

Share :