P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

Hardik Bharatbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat & Ors. - (High Court of Gujarat) (01 Oct 2015)

Hardik Patel’s application against sedition order dismissed

Criminal

The Gujarat High Court turned down Hardik Patel’s application to recall a previous order by which the judge had called for an investigation to determine if Patel had committed a cognizable offence. It noted that no mandamus had been issued that the Applicant would be charged, let alone arrested.

Relevant : Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. and others MANU/SC/1166/2013

Tags : HARDIK PATEL   SEDITION   ACCUSED   MANDAMUS   COGNIZABLE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved