Bombay HC: Clarifies Procedure for Executing Foreign Decrees || Supreme Court: Bureaucratic Delay No Excuse || Supreme Court Grants Full Disability Pension Arrears to Veterans || Delhi HC: Workman Cannot Claim Section 17(B) of the ID Act Wages after Reaching Superannuation Age || Allahabad HC: Caste by Birth Remains Unchanged Despite Conversion or Inter-Caste Marriage || Delhi High Court: Tweeting Corruption Allegations Against Employer Can Constitute Misconduct || Delhi High Court: State Gratuity Authorities Lack Jurisdiction over Multi-State Establishments || Kerala High Court: Arrest Grounds Need Not Mention Contraband Quantity When No Seizure is Made || SC: Silence During Investigation Does Not Ipso Facto Mean Non-Cooperation to Deny Bail || Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Re-Examine Answer Keys Even in Judicial Service Exams

Hardik Bharatbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat & Ors. - (High Court of Gujarat) (01 Oct 2015)

Hardik Patel’s application against sedition order dismissed

Criminal

The Gujarat High Court turned down Hardik Patel’s application to recall a previous order by which the judge had called for an investigation to determine if Patel had committed a cognizable offence. It noted that no mandamus had been issued that the Applicant would be charged, let alone arrested.

Relevant : Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. and others MANU/SC/1166/2013

Tags : HARDIK PATEL SEDITION ACCUSED MANDAMUS COGNIZABLE

Share :