NCLAT: Consideration of Debt Restructuring by Lenders Doesn’t Bar Member from Initiating Proceedings || Delhi High Court: In Matters of Medical Evaluation, Courts Should Exercise Restraint || Delhi HC: Any Person in India Has Right to Legally Import Goods from Abroad and Sell the Same || Delhi HC: Waiver to Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act to be Given Once Tribunal is Constituted || Supreme Court Has Asked States to Regularise Existing Court Managers || SC: Union & States to Create Special POSCO Courts on Top Priority || SC Upholds Authority of CERC to Award Compensation for Delays || SC: Arbitral Tribunal Has Discretion to Include in Sum Awarded, Interest at Rate as it Deems Reasonab || SC: Cannot Use Article 142 to Frame Guidelines on Judicial Recusal || SC: Satisfaction Recorder in One EP Won’t Affect Subsequent EPs for Future Breaches

Hardik Bharatbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat & Ors. - (High Court of Gujarat) (01 Oct 2015)

Hardik Patel’s application against sedition order dismissed

Criminal

The Gujarat High Court turned down Hardik Patel’s application to recall a previous order by which the judge had called for an investigation to determine if Patel had committed a cognizable offence. It noted that no mandamus had been issued that the Applicant would be charged, let alone arrested.

Relevant : Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. and others MANU/SC/1166/2013

Tags : HARDIK PATEL SEDITION ACCUSED MANDAMUS COGNIZABLE

Share :