SC: Advocate Must Protect Client Confidentiality Even after Client Turns Adversary || SC: Revenue Record Mutation Alone Cannot Defeat a Person’s Property Title || SC: SARFAESI Auction Valid Despite EMD Shortfall Where 25% Price Was Paid on Auction Day || SC: Extended GST Limitation under S.74 Requires Notice to Specify Fraud or Concealment || Allahabad HC Invalidates Key Provisions of Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Law || Delhi HC: Writ Courts Cannot Prescribe Method for Determining Property Tax || Bombay HC: ICC’s ‘No Sexual Element’ Finding Can Be Challenged under POSH Act || Rajasthan HC: Road Widening Demolition Requires Title Claims and Fair Hearing || Allahabad HC: Mere Presence or FIR Nomination is Insufficient for Conviction under Section 149 IPC || MP HC: Employment Secured Through Forged Records Gives No Right to Hold Public Office

Hardik Bharatbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat & Ors. - (High Court of Gujarat) (01 Oct 2015)

Hardik Patel’s application against sedition order dismissed

Criminal

The Gujarat High Court turned down Hardik Patel’s application to recall a previous order by which the judge had called for an investigation to determine if Patel had committed a cognizable offence. It noted that no mandamus had been issued that the Applicant would be charged, let alone arrested.

Relevant : Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. and others MANU/SC/1166/2013

Tags : HARDIK PATEL SEDITION ACCUSED MANDAMUS COGNIZABLE

Share :