Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory  ||  NCLAT Reaffirms That Borrower's Debt Acknowledgment Also Extends Limitation Period for Guarantors  ||  NCLAT: Oppression & Mismanagement Petition Cannot Be Filed Without Company Membership on Filing Date  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan Village Renaming, Says Government Must Follow its Own Policy  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Order Forensic Audit on its Own, No Separate Application Required  ||  NCLAT Reiterates That IBC Cannot be Invoked as a Recovery Tool for Contractual Disputes  ||  Delhi HC: DRI or Central Revenues Control Lab Presence in Delhi Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction    

Hindustan Motors Ltd. v. Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction - (High Court of Delhi) (28 Sep 2015)

Hindustan Motors continues to roll on its last cylinder

MANU/DE/2860/2015

SICA

Hindustan Motors was granted reprieve against an order of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction restraining it from disposing of its assets without the consent of the Board. The Court noted that HM was not given an opportunity to be heard prior to the Board’s injunction and no formal order was passed; only a printed notice was issued at the hearing. The Board’s order preventing HM from disposing of its property without consent was quashed.

Relevant : Section 22A Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Act U.P. State Sugar Corpn. Ltd. vs. U.P. State Sugar Corpn. Karamchari Assn. and Ors. MANU/SC/0723/1995

Tags : HINDUSTAN MOTORS   SICK   COMPANY   FORMAL ORDER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved