SC: Under RTE Act, States Cannot Justify Low Teacher Pay by Citing Centre’s Failure to Release Funds  ||  Supreme Court: While a Child’s Welfare is Paramount, It is Not the Sole Factor in Custody Disputes  ||  Supreme Court: High Court Cannot Reject a Plaint While Exercising Jurisdiction under Article 227  ||  SC: Merely Leasing an Apartment Does Not Bar a Flat Buyer’s Consumer Complaint Against the Builder  ||  Delhi HC: Unproven Adultery Allegations Cannot be Used to Deny Interim Maintenance under the DV Act  ||  Bombay HC: Storing Items in a Fridge isn’t Manufacturing and Doesn’t Make Premises a Factory  ||  Kerala HC: Disability Pension is Not Payable if the Condition is Unrelated to Military Service  ||  Supreme Court: Award Valid Even If Passed After Mandate Expiry When Court Extends Time  ||  Jharkhand HC: Regular Bail Plea During Interim Bail is Not Maintainable under Section 483 BNSS  ||  Cal HC: Theft Claims and Public Humiliation Alone Don’t Amount To Abetment of Suicide U/S 306 IPC    

Hindustan Motors Ltd. v. Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction - (High Court of Delhi) (28 Sep 2015)

Hindustan Motors continues to roll on its last cylinder

MANU/DE/2860/2015

SICA

Hindustan Motors was granted reprieve against an order of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction restraining it from disposing of its assets without the consent of the Board. The Court noted that HM was not given an opportunity to be heard prior to the Board’s injunction and no formal order was passed; only a printed notice was issued at the hearing. The Board’s order preventing HM from disposing of its property without consent was quashed.

Relevant : Section 22A Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Act U.P. State Sugar Corpn. Ltd. vs. U.P. State Sugar Corpn. Karamchari Assn. and Ors. MANU/SC/0723/1995

Tags : HINDUSTAN MOTORS   SICK   COMPANY   FORMAL ORDER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved