SC: POCSO Guilt Presumption Not Absolute, Acquits Accused  ||  Supreme Court: Promotion Cannot Be Claimed as a Vested Right under Repealed Rules  ||  Supreme Court: Promotion Cannot Be Claimed as a Vested Right under Repealed Rules  ||  SC: Unexplained 5-Day Sample Custody Gap Breached S.52A, Acquits 2 after 20 Years  ||  P&H High Court: Illegal Search Alone Does Not Justify Quashing of Complaint under PNDT Act  ||  Bom HC: Creating WhatsApp Group Without Employer's Permission Not Ground for Compulsory Retirement  ||  Madras HC: Lack of Son’s Moral Support Alone Cannot Sustain Father’s Maintenance Claim under CrPC  ||  Kerala HC: University Professor doesn't Occupy 'Public Office', Quo Warranto Not Maintainable  ||  Bombay HC Allows Cutting of 1,237 Mangroves for Connector Bridge in Mumbai’s Western Suburbs  ||  Calcutta HC Orders Return of 3-Year-Old to Adoptive Couple, he wasn't Abandoned    

Hindustan Motors Ltd. v. Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction - (High Court of Delhi) (28 Sep 2015)

Hindustan Motors continues to roll on its last cylinder

MANU/DE/2860/2015

SICA

Hindustan Motors was granted reprieve against an order of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction restraining it from disposing of its assets without the consent of the Board. The Court noted that HM was not given an opportunity to be heard prior to the Board’s injunction and no formal order was passed; only a printed notice was issued at the hearing. The Board’s order preventing HM from disposing of its property without consent was quashed.

Relevant : Section 22A Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Act U.P. State Sugar Corpn. Ltd. vs. U.P. State Sugar Corpn. Karamchari Assn. and Ors. MANU/SC/0723/1995

Tags : HINDUSTAN MOTORS   SICK   COMPANY   FORMAL ORDER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved