NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

Hindustan Motors Ltd. v. Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction - (High Court of Delhi) (28 Sep 2015)

Hindustan Motors continues to roll on its last cylinder

MANU/DE/2860/2015

SICA

Hindustan Motors was granted reprieve against an order of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction restraining it from disposing of its assets without the consent of the Board. The Court noted that HM was not given an opportunity to be heard prior to the Board’s injunction and no formal order was passed; only a printed notice was issued at the hearing. The Board’s order preventing HM from disposing of its property without consent was quashed.

Relevant : Section 22A Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Act U.P. State Sugar Corpn. Ltd. vs. U.P. State Sugar Corpn. Karamchari Assn. and Ors. MANU/SC/0723/1995

Tags : HINDUSTAN MOTORS   SICK   COMPANY   FORMAL ORDER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved