Madhya Pradesh High Court: Victims Must be Given a Hearing Even Before Closure Report Rejection  ||  Delhi HC: Payment of ‘Pagri’ Does Not Render Tenancy Non-Terminable, Allowing Eviction  ||  Ker HC Examined Whether Electro-Homeopathy Can be Practised Without Registration under Medical Laws  ||  Delhi HC: Better Possessory Title Holder Can Recover Property From Occupant Without Superior Right  ||  Bombay High Court: Compensatory Afforestation Must Be in Same or Nearby Locality For Residents  ||  Bombay High Court Protects ‘MEFTAL-SPAS’, Restrains Use of Similar Drug Brand  ||  Supreme Court: Inclusion in Revised Select List Does Not Give TN MV Inspectors a Vested Right  ||  Bombay HC: ICC Cannot Hear Sexual Harassment Complaint over Non-Employer Transport Incident  ||  Ker HC Upholds Rule that Homeopathic Doctors Must Cancel Registration Before Enrolment as Advocates  ||  J&K&L HC: Evidence Negating Penetration Warrants Conviction For Attempt to Rape, Not Rape    

Hindustan Motors Ltd. v. Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction - (High Court of Delhi) (28 Sep 2015)

Hindustan Motors continues to roll on its last cylinder

MANU/DE/2860/2015

SICA

Hindustan Motors was granted reprieve against an order of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction restraining it from disposing of its assets without the consent of the Board. The Court noted that HM was not given an opportunity to be heard prior to the Board’s injunction and no formal order was passed; only a printed notice was issued at the hearing. The Board’s order preventing HM from disposing of its property without consent was quashed.

Relevant : Section 22A Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Act U.P. State Sugar Corpn. Ltd. vs. U.P. State Sugar Corpn. Karamchari Assn. and Ors. MANU/SC/0723/1995

Tags : HINDUSTAN MOTORS   SICK   COMPANY   FORMAL ORDER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved