Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order || Supreme Court: Certiorari Can Quash a Tribunal Decision That is Grossly Perverse || Supreme Court: Informant’s Consent is Not Required to Quash a Case Settled With the Victim || Madras High Court: False Posts Against a Minister are Not an Offence Without Intent to Cause Alarm || Delhi High Court: Police Cannot Pick and Choose Among Accused Persons for Arrest || J&K High Court: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 and are Outside Writ Jurisdiction || Calcutta High Court: Third Parties Can Challenge Inaction Against Unauthorised Construction || Madras High Court: Being an Advocate Does Not Mean a Person Cannot Commit an Offence || Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Reopen Settled Marital Disputes to Avoid Maintenance Liability || Calcutta High Court: State Cannot Deny CRMI Seats to Foreign Medical Graduates Citing Stipend Costs

National Spot Exchange Limited v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. - (High Court of Bombay) (01 Oct 2015)

NSEL subject to provisions of MPID

MANU/MH/2581/2015

Criminal

The Bombay High Court dismissed NSEL’s petition against the application of Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999. It determined NSEL, the alleged fraud perpetrated and the purpose for which money was received by depositors to fulfill all conditions for attracting the MPID Act.

Relevant : Section 3 Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 Act

Tags : STOCK EXCHANGE MAHARASHTRA DEPOSITORS

Share :