SC: Disciplinary Proceedings Cannot Follow if an Officer is Discharged on the Same Charge || SC Clarified the Distinction Between Arbitration “Seat” And “Venue” While Summarising Key Principles || Supreme Court: Wife and Her Family Cannot Be Prosecuted For Dowry-Giving Based On Her Complaint || SC: Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on the Ground of Order II Rule 2 Bar || Supreme Court Has Issued an SOP Prescribing Strict Timelines For Filing Legal Aid Appeals || Madras HC: Dhurandhar 2 Release Cannot be Stalled Due to Objections From a Small Section || Delhi HC: Lokpal May Form Prima Facie Opinion Before Show Cause Notice Without Prior Hearing || Bom HC: Family Courts Cannot Casually Order a Spouse’s Medical Examination to Assess Mental Health || Bombay HC: Child Care Leave Protects Motherhood and Denial Violates Rights of Mother and Child || Supreme Court: Amalgamating Company Loss Cannot be Set Off Against Amalgamated Income

National Spot Exchange Limited v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. - (High Court of Bombay) (01 Oct 2015)

NSEL subject to provisions of MPID

MANU/MH/2581/2015

Criminal

The Bombay High Court dismissed NSEL’s petition against the application of Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999. It determined NSEL, the alleged fraud perpetrated and the purpose for which money was received by depositors to fulfill all conditions for attracting the MPID Act.

Relevant : Section 3 Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 Act

Tags : STOCK EXCHANGE MAHARASHTRA DEPOSITORS

Share :