SC: Advocate Must Protect Client Confidentiality Even after Client Turns Adversary  ||  SC: Revenue Record Mutation Alone Cannot Defeat a Person’s Property Title  ||  SC: SARFAESI Auction Valid Despite EMD Shortfall Where 25% Price Was Paid on Auction Day  ||  SC: Extended GST Limitation under S.74 Requires Notice to Specify Fraud or Concealment  ||  Allahabad HC Invalidates Key Provisions of Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Law  ||  Delhi HC: Writ Courts Cannot Prescribe Method for Determining Property Tax  ||  Bombay HC: ICC’s ‘No Sexual Element’ Finding Can Be Challenged under POSH Act  ||  Rajasthan HC: Road Widening Demolition Requires Title Claims and Fair Hearing  ||  Allahabad HC: Mere Presence or FIR Nomination is Insufficient for Conviction under Section 149 IPC  ||  MP HC: Employment Secured Through Forged Records Gives No Right to Hold Public Office    

Madras HC Issues Circular; No Court/ Tribunal To Accept Vakalatnama Sans Advocate’s Complete Details - (21 Dec 2017)

Madras High Court has issued a circular directing heads of all sections of the Registry to not accept any vakalatnama sans the enrolment ID, mobile phone number and complete residential address of the counsel as well as the advocate who has attested the vakalatnama.

Tags : MADRAS HIGH COURT   VAKALATNAMA  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved