Bombay HC: Railway Employee With Valid Privilege Pass is Bona Fide Passenger Despite Missing Entries  ||  Delhi High Court: Mere Pleadings Made To Prosecute or Defend a Case Do Not Amount To Defamation  ||  Delhi High Court: Asking an Accused To Cross-Examine a Witness Without Legal Aid Vitiates The Trial  ||  Delhi High Court: Recruitment Notice Error Creates No Appointment Right Without Vacancy  ||  Supreme Court: Subordinate Legislation Takes Effect Only From its Publication in The Official Gazette  ||  Supreme Court: DDA Must Adopt a Litigation Policy To Screen Cases and Avoid Unnecessary Filings  ||  Authorities Holding Public Auctions Must Disclose All Known Encumbrances and Related Litigation  ||  SC: Compensatory Allowances Must Be Included While Computing Overtime Wages U/S 59 of Factories Act  ||  SC: NGT Has No Jurisdiction to Decide Disputes Relating to Building Plan Violations  ||  SC: Evidence is Often Fabricated Using AI And False Allegations are Rampant in Matrimonial Cases    

2008 Malegaon Blasts: Bombay HC Upholds UAPA Charges, Rejects Purohit’s Plea Challenging Them - (19 Dec 2017)

Bombay High Court has rejected a petition filed by Lt Col Prasad Purohit and Sameer Kulkarni, both accused in 2008 Malegaon bomb blasts case, challenging the application of the stringent provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), 1967, to the case.

Tags : BOMBAY HC   MALEGAON BLASTS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved