Delhi High Court Grants Interim Relief to Mokobara in Trademark Case  ||  Delhi HC: Students Shouldn’t be Excluded from Admission because of Untimely Declaration of Results  ||  Madras HC: Nobody Other than the State Can Claim Ownership to Natham Lands  ||  Delhi HC: Larger Bench to Decide Whether Section 149(1)(c) of IT Act Applies Retrospectively  ||  Madras High Court Upholds Regulations Imposing Night Ban on Online Real Money Games  ||  President Promulgates Amendment Ordinance for J&K Reservation Act, 2004  ||  Calcutta High Court Refuses Relief to Law Student in Offensive Video Case  ||  SC: NBE Files Application Seeking Postponement of NEET-PG 2025  ||  Delhi HC Grants ‘Superlative Injunction’ in Favor of Broadcaster Star India  ||  NCLAT: Suspended Management of CD is Prohibited from Deploying the Funds of Corporate Debtor    

RBI imposes Monetary Penalty on M/s Radhakrishna Finance Pvt. Ltd- (Reserve Bank of India) (14 Dec 2017)

MANU/RPRL/0193/2017

Banking

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has imposed a monetary penalty of ?1 lakh on M/s Radhakrishna Finance Pvt. Ltd. (the company) under Section 58G(1)(b) read with Sub-section 5(aa) of section 58B of the RBI Act, 1934 for violation of various directions/orders issued by Reserve Bank of India from time to time.

Background

A scrutiny of the company under section 45N of Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (the RBI Act, 1934) with reference to its financial position as on March 31, 2016 was conducted on February 16, 2017. During the course of scrutiny, it was observed that directions on subordinated debt have been violated by company in process of redemption of Subordinated debt, without obtaining the consent of the Bank, which is in violation of para 2(1) (xxvi) of the instructions contained in the circular DNBR. (PD).CC.No.044/03.10.119/2015-16 dated July 01, 2015 and item (xvii) of para 3 in Chapter II of Master Directions on Acceptance of PD Directions 2016 dated August 25, 2016, issued by the Bank. The company was issued a Show Cause Notice (SCN) on June 7, 2017, for imposition of penalty. The company's response to the SCN was not found to be satisfactory. The company was further accorded a personal hearing by RBI under section 58G (2) of the RBI Act, 1934. After considering the facts of the case and the company's reply, as also, personal submissions made during the hearing, RBI came to the conclusion that the violations as mentioned above were substantiated which warranted imposition of monetary penalty on the company. Accordingly, a penalty of ? 1 lakh has been imposed on the company.

Tags : DIRECTION   VIOLATION   PENALTY   IMPOSITION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved