SC: Repeated Anticipatory Bail Pleas Abuse Process and Reduce Litigation to a Gamble  ||  Supreme Court: State Officers Cannot Back Litigants Through Affidavits Against the Law  ||  Supreme Court: Accused Deserves Parity With Discharged Co-Accused if Evidence is Not Stronger  ||  SC Allows Euthanasia of Rabid Stray Dogs if Necessary and Protects Officials Acting in Good Faith  ||  Kerala High Court: University Syndicate Cannot Sue Chancellor as Both Form Same Legal Body  ||  Kerala High Court: Unsigned FIS is Admissible if Informant Confirms its Contents in Court  ||  J&K&L High Court: Purchaser’s Structure on Migrant Land Alone Cannot Block Sale Deed Registration  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Remains the Rule and Jail the Exception, Even under the UAPA Law  ||  Supreme Court: Principle of Res Judicata Also Applies Between Stages of the Same Case  ||  Supreme Court: Govt Servant Has No Right to Old Rule Promotion Just Due to Earlier Vacancies    

RBI imposes Monetary Penalty on M/s Radhakrishna Finance Pvt. Ltd- (Reserve Bank of India) (14 Dec 2017)

MANU/RPRL/0193/2017

Banking

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has imposed a monetary penalty of ?1 lakh on M/s Radhakrishna Finance Pvt. Ltd. (the company) under Section 58G(1)(b) read with Sub-section 5(aa) of section 58B of the RBI Act, 1934 for violation of various directions/orders issued by Reserve Bank of India from time to time.

Background

A scrutiny of the company under section 45N of Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (the RBI Act, 1934) with reference to its financial position as on March 31, 2016 was conducted on February 16, 2017. During the course of scrutiny, it was observed that directions on subordinated debt have been violated by company in process of redemption of Subordinated debt, without obtaining the consent of the Bank, which is in violation of para 2(1) (xxvi) of the instructions contained in the circular DNBR. (PD).CC.No.044/03.10.119/2015-16 dated July 01, 2015 and item (xvii) of para 3 in Chapter II of Master Directions on Acceptance of PD Directions 2016 dated August 25, 2016, issued by the Bank. The company was issued a Show Cause Notice (SCN) on June 7, 2017, for imposition of penalty. The company's response to the SCN was not found to be satisfactory. The company was further accorded a personal hearing by RBI under section 58G (2) of the RBI Act, 1934. After considering the facts of the case and the company's reply, as also, personal submissions made during the hearing, RBI came to the conclusion that the violations as mentioned above were substantiated which warranted imposition of monetary penalty on the company. Accordingly, a penalty of ? 1 lakh has been imposed on the company.

Tags : DIRECTION   VIOLATION   PENALTY   IMPOSITION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved