Raj HC: Convicted Minor Gang Rapist Not Fully Barred From Open-Air Camps; Rules Allow Exceptions  ||  Calcutta High Court: Serving a Show-Cause Notice Via Email is Valid under PMLA Regulations  ||  Del HC: Candidate’s Independent Medical Opinions Don’t Justify Fresh Medical Exam in SSC Recruitment  ||  Calcutta HC: Magistrate Must Assess Grounds, Cannot Order Police Inquiry under Section 175(3) BNSS  ||  SC Grants Law Officer Exam Relief, Saying Students Can’t be Blamed When Judges Differ in Views  ||  SC: Fraudulent Diversion of Company Funds Cannot be Validated by Later Shareholder Ratification  ||  SC: Doctor’s View on a Victim’s Consciousness Prevails over Police Assessment in Dying Declarations  ||  SC: Examining Contradictions and Witness Credibility Exceeds the Scope of Section 319 CrPC  ||  Supreme Court Struck Down Section 60(4), Removing Limits on Maternity Benefits For Adoptive Mothers  ||  Supreme Court: Air Force Group Insurance Society qualifies as ‘State’ under Article 12    

In Re: Ajai Kumar Bhardwaj - (High Court of Allahabad) (24 Sep 2015)

Advocates cannot condemn judges lightly

MANU/UP/1401/2015

Contempt of Court

In a contempt of court reference by an Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate against the Contemner for making false complaints against judicial officers, the Court sentenced him to six months’ imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 2,000, while also barring him from the court of the complainant magistrate for one year. It reiterated that advocates could not be “silent spectator” upon seeing a lack in judicial integrity, but the same did not give them a licence to “raise his finger over the competency and integrity” of a judicial officer, either casually or negligently.

Relevant : Subhash Chand v. S.M. Aggrawal MANU/DE/0359/1983 Manik Chand Gupta v. Virendra Kumar MANU/UP/0378/1978 P.N. Duda v. P. Shiv Shankar and others MANU/SC/0362/1988

Tags : CONTEMPT   ADVOCATE   JUDGE   ALLEGATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved