Supreme Court Rebukes RBI for Remaining a Bystander as YES Bank Operated Clandestinely  ||  Supreme Court: Lower Fresh Bids Alone Cannot Justify Cancellation of an Auction  ||  Supreme Court Directs Delhi Police to Produce Section 163 BNSS Orders and Preserve CCTV Footage  ||  Supreme Court Affirms Menstrual Hygiene as a Fundamental Right, Warns States of Contempt  ||  Supreme Court Flags AI-Generated Fake Judgments Submitted in a Party’s Case Compilation  ||  Karnataka High Court: Vijay Mallya’s Flamboyant Lifestyle Hinders Settlement of Bank Claims  ||  Delhi High Court: Women can be Booked for Gang Rape without Physically Committing it  ||  Delhi High Court: Litigants Must Track Their Cases and Cannot Blame Lawyers for Their Own Inaction  ||  Allahabad High Court: Contract Workers Must Prove Work Parity With Regular Staff for Equal Pay  ||  Allahabad High Court Directs UP Trial Courts to Decide Maintenance Execution Cases Within Six Months    

Armada (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. v. Ashapura Minechem Ltd. - (High Court of Bombay) (08 Sep 2015)

Execution of arbitration of arbitral award impermissible without permission of BIFR

MANU/MH/2374/2015

Arbitration

Mere violation of Indian law is not sufficient to raise an objection for enforcement of the foreign award under Section 48 of the Arbitration Act, 1996. In a case where Petitioner sought execution of awards made by a foreign arbitrator, the Court held that though the awards were decreed, the Petitioner could not go ahead the same without permission from the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, in violation of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.

Relevant : Section 22 Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Act Tropic Shipping Company Limited vs. Kothari Global Limited MANU/MH/0790/2001 Penn Racquet Sports vs. Mayor International Ltd. MANU/DE/0147/2011

Tags : ARBITRATION   SICA   FOREIGN   BIFR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved