Allahabad HC Reduces Cop's Sentence in 1984 Attempt-to-Murder Case, Awards Rs. 35,000 to Victim  ||  Delhi High Court: Copyright Owners and ISPs Cannot Unilaterally Declare a Website 'Rogue'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Teacher's Reprimand for Poor Attendance and Performance is Not Abetment of Suicide  ||  Karnataka High Court: Police Assistance to Enforce Injunction Not Barred by Res Judicata  ||  SC Upholds Validity of Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act, Says ITC Depends on Supplier's Tax Payment  ||  Supreme Court: Registration Certificate Alone Can't Secure Interim Release of Seized Vehicles  ||  Supreme Court: IBC Moratorium Doesn't Shield Promoters, Directors From Consumer Complaints  ||  Supreme Court: Accused Person's Advocate Cannot Remain Present During Entire Police Interrogation  ||  Uttarakhand HC: Severity of POCSO Charges Alone Cannot Deny Juvenile Bail  ||  Madras HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Man Accused of Watching CM Vijay's Unreleased Film Online    

Armada (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. v. Ashapura Minechem Ltd. - (High Court of Bombay) (08 Sep 2015)

Execution of arbitration of arbitral award impermissible without permission of BIFR

MANU/MH/2374/2015

Arbitration

Mere violation of Indian law is not sufficient to raise an objection for enforcement of the foreign award under Section 48 of the Arbitration Act, 1996. In a case where Petitioner sought execution of awards made by a foreign arbitrator, the Court held that though the awards were decreed, the Petitioner could not go ahead the same without permission from the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, in violation of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.

Relevant : Section 22 Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Act Tropic Shipping Company Limited vs. Kothari Global Limited MANU/MH/0790/2001 Penn Racquet Sports vs. Mayor International Ltd. MANU/DE/0147/2011

Tags : ARBITRATION   SICA   FOREIGN   BIFR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved