Delhi HC: Education Department Cannot Restrict Recruitment in Aided Minority Schools  ||  Allahabad HC: Senior Citizens Act Cannot Decide Title Disputes Unless Transfer Challengeable  ||  Bombay HC: Family Arrangement Execution Alone Not Proof of HUF Property Admission  ||  Patna HC: BAU Statutes Cannot Convert 2011 Direct Recruitment into Tenure Appointment  ||  P&H HC: Dressing Pet Dog as Lord Krishna Out of Devotion is Not Offence and Does Not Hurt Sentiments  ||  J&K HC Quashes 2016 Case Against Coca-Cola Over in Dual Pricing MRPs Allegations  ||  Supreme Court Explains the Grounds for Declaring a Judgment Per Incuriam  ||  SC: Summoning Hotel Records, Phone Data to Prove Adultery Does Not Breach Privacy Rights  ||  SC: Magistrates Should Not Record Prosecution Evidence in Sessions-Triable Cases  ||  Supreme Court Lays Down Guidelines on Using ITRs to Assess Motor Accident Victims' Income    

Supreme Court: Cooling Off Period Mentioned in S. 13-B(2) of HMA is Not Mandatory - (13 Sep 2017)

Supreme Court, while relaxing the procedure of granting divorce on ground of mutual consent, has said that period mentioned in S. 13-B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act is not mandatory but directory, and "it will be open to Court to exercise its discretion in the facts and circumstances of each case".

Tags : SUPREME COURT   DIVORCE CASE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved