Supreme Court: Foreign Judgment Unenforceable in India Without Fair Opportunity to Defend  ||  Supreme Court: High Court Cannot Decide Appeal Pending Before Statutory Authority Due to Delay  ||  Supreme Court: SDO Lacks Authority to Change Land Classification under UP Zamindari Abolition Act  ||  Supreme Court: Man Not Liable For Maintenance if DNA Test Proves He is Not the Child’s Father  ||  SC: Prison Must Not Dilute Rights of Disabled Inmates; Oversight Given to High-Powered Panel  ||  Delhi High Court: Judges Would Have to Recuse if Children as Central Govt Counsel is Treated as Bias  ||  Delhi HC: Fresh Tenders Allowed Despite Existing Contracts; Anticipatory Grievances Not Entertained  ||  Delhi High Court: Judges Cannot Respond Publicly; Criticism Must Be Responsible and Evidence-Based  ||  J&K&L High Court: IO Not Bound By FIR; Can Modify Offences in Final Chargesheet U/S 173 CrPC  ||  Supreme Court: Brief Service Breaks Do Not Bar Ad Hoc Employees From Regularisation    

Reetika and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors. - (High Court of Punjab and Haryana) (21 Sep 2015)

High Court dismisses petition calling for cancellation of PMET 2015

Education

A Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld a previous decision rejecting pleas by the Appellants for cancellation of the 2015 Pre-Medical Entrance Test, but those sitting for the examination were entitled to carry the question booklets with them after the exam. On a question of whether an expert report produced by the Appellants was to be accepted against that of the University expert, the Court held that the University expert’s answer key was to be considered correct unless it was shown to be “glaringly improbable or impossible”, which it was not in the instant case.

Relevant : N. Lokanadham v. Chairman, Telecom Commission MANU/SC/7550/2008

Tags : PMET   2015   CANCEL   ANSWER KEY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved