Supreme Court Upholds Conviction as Husband Failed to Explain Wife’s Death in Matrimonial Home  ||  Supreme Court: Crime Scene Re-Enactment Does Not Always Violate Right Against Self-Incrimination  ||  Supreme Court: Cognizance Taken Without Hearing Accused under BNSS Section 223 is Void Ab Initio  ||  Supreme Court Upholds Will in Sister’s Favour, Says Excluding Natural Heirs is Not Suspicious  ||  Delhi HC: Absence of Public Witnesses and Videography in NDPS Recovery Relevant for Bail Decisions  ||  Raj HC Initiates Suo Motu Cognizance Over Severe Water Crisis in Jodhpur, Issues Interim Directions  ||  Del HC: Courts Cannot Direct, Monitor Inquiry Into Police Delay in Investigation After Bail Decision  ||  Supreme Court: After the BNSS, a Pre-Cognizance Hearing is Mandatory in PMLA Cases  ||  SC: Landowners Cannot be Forced to Waive Statutory Compensation to Claim Other Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Banks are Lenient With Big Borrowers But Strict With Ordinary Loan Applicants    

Reetika and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors. - (High Court of Punjab and Haryana) (21 Sep 2015)

High Court dismisses petition calling for cancellation of PMET 2015

Education

A Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld a previous decision rejecting pleas by the Appellants for cancellation of the 2015 Pre-Medical Entrance Test, but those sitting for the examination were entitled to carry the question booklets with them after the exam. On a question of whether an expert report produced by the Appellants was to be accepted against that of the University expert, the Court held that the University expert’s answer key was to be considered correct unless it was shown to be “glaringly improbable or impossible”, which it was not in the instant case.

Relevant : N. Lokanadham v. Chairman, Telecom Commission MANU/SC/7550/2008

Tags : PMET   2015   CANCEL   ANSWER KEY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved