SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Litigant Cannot be Worse Off for Filing an Appeal under ‘No Reformatio in Peius’  ||  Orissa HC: Article 22(1) Arrest Rights Pre-Exist, Written Grounds Ruling Not Prospective  ||  Kerala HC: Kissing a Child’s Penis Constitutes Penetrative Sexual Assault under POCSO  ||  Madras HC: Married Daughter Cannot be Denied Compassionate Appointment Solely for Her Marriage  ||  Bombay High Court: Child Welfare Prevails as ‘Joint Parenting’ is Not Recognised in Indian Law  ||  Kerala HC: Minor’s Consent or Relationship with Accused Holds No Relevance under POCSO Act  ||  Bombay HC: Failure to Prove Exact Quantum of Loss Does Not Bar Compensation  ||  CCPA Fines Dial4Trade Rs. 10 Lakh for Online Ammonium Nitrate Listing Featuring Blast Images  ||  Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order    

Reetika and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors. - (High Court of Punjab and Haryana) (21 Sep 2015)

High Court dismisses petition calling for cancellation of PMET 2015

Education

A Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld a previous decision rejecting pleas by the Appellants for cancellation of the 2015 Pre-Medical Entrance Test, but those sitting for the examination were entitled to carry the question booklets with them after the exam. On a question of whether an expert report produced by the Appellants was to be accepted against that of the University expert, the Court held that the University expert’s answer key was to be considered correct unless it was shown to be “glaringly improbable or impossible”, which it was not in the instant case.

Relevant : N. Lokanadham v. Chairman, Telecom Commission MANU/SC/7550/2008

Tags : PMET   2015   CANCEL   ANSWER KEY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved