Delhi HC Rejects Plea Against BCCI Team Named 'Team India', Terms it a Sheer Waste of Time  ||  Bombay HC: No Absolute Right for Citizens to Access Public Offices  ||  Delhi HC: Suit Withdrawal After Compromise Doesn’t Result in Executable Decree  ||  Delhi HC: ITSC Abolition Doesn’t Void Settlement Pleas Filed Between Feb 1–Mar 31, 2021  ||  Rajasthan HC: State Must Set Up Trauma Centre, Art Institute; Temple Board Can Only Assist  ||  Kerala HC: LIC Cancer Cover Starts From First Diagnosis After Waiting Period, Not Expert Opinion  ||  Kerala HC: Spouse’s Ill Treatment of Children is Cruelty under Section 10(1) Divorce Act  ||  Supreme Court Acquits Chennai Man Sentenced to Death in Child Rape-Murder Case  ||  SC: Only Disclosure Leading to Weapon Recovery Admissible under Section 27 Evidence Act  ||  Supreme Court Orders Strict Enforcement on Helmets, Lane Discipline & Headlight Use    

CSEPDI - TRISHE Consortium v. Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (07 Sep 2015)

Reprieve for CSEPDI–TRISHE in Tamil Nadu power project

MANU/TN/2979/2015

Commercial

The Court directed TANGEDCO to evaluate CSPEDI-TRISHE bids for setting up thermal power projects in the tender floated. Looking into the tendering process, reports produced by TANGEDCO and public interest, it determined that the price offered may not always be the sole criterion on which a contract was awarded. Factors such as past record of bidders, market reputation and quality of goods offered would play an important role in determining award of contract.

Relevant : Star Enterprises and others v. City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. MANU/SC/0459/1990 W.B. State Electricity Board v. Patel Engineering Co. MANU/SC/0024/2001 S.C.T. Limited and another v. Punjab State Electricity Board and others MANU/PH/0458/2005

Tags : TENDER   LOWEST PRICE   QUALITY   ELECTRICITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved