NCLAT: IRP Has Authority to Take Possession of Assets Owned by Corporate Debtor  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Direct Forwarding a Copy of its Order to Relevant Statutory Authorities  ||  Delhi HC: Centre to Expedite Process of Accessibility Features in OTT platforms for PwDs  ||  Delhi HC: Once Worker Provides Testimony Under Oath ‘Burden of Proof’ Shifts on Employer  ||  SC: There Cannot be Discrimination in Matter of Payment of Pension to Retired Judges  ||  SC: India is Not a Dharamshala that Can Entertain Foreign Nationals from All Over  ||  SC: Can Quash Domestic Violence Act Complaints Under Section 482 of CrPC  ||  Supreme Court: Can’t Use Statement of One Accused against Another  ||  SC: Inclusion of Name in Draft NRC Cannot Annul Foreigners Tribunal’s Declaration as Non-Citizen  ||  Supreme Court: Minimum Practice of 3 Years Mandatory to Enter Judicial Service    

CSEPDI - TRISHE Consortium v. Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (07 Sep 2015)

Reprieve for CSEPDI–TRISHE in Tamil Nadu power project

MANU/TN/2979/2015

Commercial

The Court directed TANGEDCO to evaluate CSPEDI-TRISHE bids for setting up thermal power projects in the tender floated. Looking into the tendering process, reports produced by TANGEDCO and public interest, it determined that the price offered may not always be the sole criterion on which a contract was awarded. Factors such as past record of bidders, market reputation and quality of goods offered would play an important role in determining award of contract.

Relevant : Star Enterprises and others v. City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. MANU/SC/0459/1990 W.B. State Electricity Board v. Patel Engineering Co. MANU/SC/0024/2001 S.C.T. Limited and another v. Punjab State Electricity Board and others MANU/PH/0458/2005

Tags : TENDER   LOWEST PRICE   QUALITY   ELECTRICITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved