P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

CSEPDI - TRISHE Consortium v. Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (07 Sep 2015)

Reprieve for CSEPDI–TRISHE in Tamil Nadu power project

MANU/TN/2979/2015

Commercial

The Court directed TANGEDCO to evaluate CSPEDI-TRISHE bids for setting up thermal power projects in the tender floated. Looking into the tendering process, reports produced by TANGEDCO and public interest, it determined that the price offered may not always be the sole criterion on which a contract was awarded. Factors such as past record of bidders, market reputation and quality of goods offered would play an important role in determining award of contract.

Relevant : Star Enterprises and others v. City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. MANU/SC/0459/1990 W.B. State Electricity Board v. Patel Engineering Co. MANU/SC/0024/2001 S.C.T. Limited and another v. Punjab State Electricity Board and others MANU/PH/0458/2005

Tags : TENDER   LOWEST PRICE   QUALITY   ELECTRICITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved