NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App.  ||  Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement  ||  Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles  ||  Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025"  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark  ||  Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity  ||  Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks  ||  HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity  ||  Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void  ||  Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it    

CSEPDI - TRISHE Consortium v. Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (07 Sep 2015)

Reprieve for CSEPDI–TRISHE in Tamil Nadu power project

MANU/TN/2979/2015

Commercial

The Court directed TANGEDCO to evaluate CSPEDI-TRISHE bids for setting up thermal power projects in the tender floated. Looking into the tendering process, reports produced by TANGEDCO and public interest, it determined that the price offered may not always be the sole criterion on which a contract was awarded. Factors such as past record of bidders, market reputation and quality of goods offered would play an important role in determining award of contract.

Relevant : Star Enterprises and others v. City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. MANU/SC/0459/1990 W.B. State Electricity Board v. Patel Engineering Co. MANU/SC/0024/2001 S.C.T. Limited and another v. Punjab State Electricity Board and others MANU/PH/0458/2005

Tags : TENDER   LOWEST PRICE   QUALITY   ELECTRICITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved