Chhattisgarh HC: Complaints Without Disciplinary Action Cannot Affect a Judge's Seniority || Delhi HC Upholds Selection of India's Dressage Team For the 2026 Asian Games || MP High Court Orders State to Airlift Gas Pipeline Blast Victim to Ahmedabad For Treatment || Delhi HC: Memorandum of Past Oral Family Settlement Needs No Registration if No New Rights Arise || Chhattisgarh HC: Denying Marriage in Live-In Relationship Does Not Constitute Rape || Madhya Pradesh High Court: BSF Must Assess Criminal Charge Gravity Before Declaring Candidate Unfit || Bihar Tender Scam: Patna High Court Bars Media From Calling Accused 'Scamster' Before Trial || Gujarat HC Terms Plea ‘Wholly Misconceived’ and Imposes Rs. 2 Lakh Cost over ASI Somnath Survey || Gauhati HC Differs on Whether ED’s ‘Reason To Believe’ For Property Attachment is Confidential || MP High Court Grants Bail To Tehelka Journalist, Noting Implication After Exposing Foeticide Racket

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :