Bombay HC Conducts Emergency Hearing from CJ’s Residence as Court Staff Deployed for Elections || Madras HC: Preventive Detention Laws are Draconian, Cannot be Used to Curb Dissent or Settle Politics || HP HC: Mere Interest in a Project Cannot Justify Impleading a Non-Signatory in Arbitration || J&K&L HC: Women Accused in Non-Bailable Offences Form a Distinct Class Beyond Sec 437 CrPC Rigour || Bombay HC Restores IMAX’s Enforcement of Foreign Awards Against E-City, Applying Res Judicata || Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Bail For Man Accused of Assault Causing Miscarriage || J&K&L High Court Invalidates Residence-Based Reservation, Citing Violation of Article 16 || Kerala HC Denies Parole to Life Convict in TP Chandrasekharan Murder Case For Cousin's Funeral || High Court Grants Bail to J&K Bank Manager in Multi-Crore Loan Fraud Case, Emphasizing Bail As Rule || J&K HC: Civil Remedy Alone Cannot Be Used To Quash Criminal Proceedings in Enso Tower Case

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :