SC: Subsidy Taxability Depends on its Purpose under The Income Tax Law || MP HC:Revenue Authority’s Decision Can’t Operate as Res Judicata in Absence of Express Statutory Bar || SC: Breakup Followed by Suicide does not Automatically Amount to Abetment to Suicide || SC: Election Petition under Representation of the People Act Must be Filed Personally by Petitioner || Patna HC: Template Arrest Memo cannot Satisfy Mandate under Article 22 of Constitution || MP HC: Delayed Cruelty FIR not Counterblast When Wife “Remains Silent” to Save her Married Life || MP HC:Revenue Authority’s Decision Can’t Operate as Res Judicata in Absence of Express Statutory Bar || Patna HC: Signature Mismatch alone cannot Prove OMR Tampering || J&K&L HC: Bail can be Set Aside if Contrary to Statutory Mandate || Kerala HC: Headmistress’s Churidar cannot Bar Entry, Clothing Choice is A Fundamental Right

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :