Supreme Court: Ad Valorem Court Fees Apply to Appeals Seeking Statutory Land Acquisition Benefits || Supreme Court: Cruise Voyages Remain Shipping Business under Section 44B Despite Onboard Services || Supreme Court: People Abandon Cattle on Roads But Object to Their Use For Food || Supreme Court Stays CIC Decision Declaring NSE Subject to the RTI Act || SC: Wife May Be Denied Interim Maintenance if Husband Ex Facie Establishes Adultery || SC: Prior Testimony is Inadmissible without Section 299 CrPC Order against Absconder || Supreme Court: Administrative Action Can't Be Invalidated Solely for Lacking Formal Order || Calcutta High Court: Section 141 NI Act Does Not Apply to Sole Proprietorships || Orissa High Court Criticizes Magistrate for Defying Direction in Cheque Bounce Case || Delhi High Court Safeguards Yuvraj Singh's Personality Rights, Orders Deepfake Takedown

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :