Allahabad HC: Divorce on Desertion Ground Does Not Bar Wife’s Maintenance Claim U/S 125 CrPC || Allahabad HC: Divorce on Desertion Ground Does Not Bar Wife’s Maintenance Claim U/S 125 CrPC || Bombay HC on Nicotine Pouch Ban: Duty-Free Shops Must Comply with Domestic Laws || SEBI Settles Hindenburg-linked Disclosure Cases Involving Five Adani Firms for Rs. 1.5 Crore || Kerala High Court: Navy Court-Martial Proceedings Can Be Prosecuted by Investigating Officer || Bombay HC: Arrest is Drastic; ED Cannot Halt Section 50 Questioning and Arrest on Same Material || Supreme Court Proposes Unified Platform for Investment of Funds Deposited by Litigants || Supreme Court: Courts Can Interfere When Tender Acceptance Violates NIT Conditions || SC: Recovery of Tainted Money Without Proof of Bribe Demand Insufficient for Conviction || Supreme Court: Non-Production of Original Deed Not a Ground to Discharge Accused

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :