Supreme Court: Calling Someone ‘Bastard’ In Heated Exchange Isn’t Obscenity under IPC Section 294 || Supreme Court: Even a Single Tainted Public Work Award Violates Article 14 || Supreme Court Upholds Lease Cancellation, Denies Relief for Failure to Develop Allotted Land || Supreme Court Quashes Medical Negligence Case, Says Surgeon Best Placed To Choose Procedure || Supreme Court: Sajjadanashin of a Dargah and Mutawalli of a Waqf are Distinct Roles || Supreme Court: Criminal Proceedings Can be Quashed if Reliable Evidence Disproves Allegations || Delhi HC: Promises by CM at Press Conferences are Not Legally Enforceable Without Policy Support || Allahabad HC: Challenges to Tribunal Orders Must be Filed in the HC With Territorial Jurisdiction || Allahabad HC: Challenges to Tribunal Orders Must be Filed in the HC With Territorial Jurisdiction || J&K&L HC: Historical Books Cannot Establish Private Property Titles under Section 57 Evidence Act

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :