SC: Daily-Wage Status Cannot Deny Annual Increment After Regularisation || SC: Exam Marks Cannot Substitute Mandatory Qualification under Recruitment Rules || SC: Converting Civil Disputes Into Criminal Cases is a Widespread Practice || Kerala High Court Sets Aside KAAPA Preventive Detention Order Against BJP Councillor R Suguthan || Bombay High Court Punishes Two Lawyers for Contempt over Threats to Trial Judge || MP HC Plea Challenges Municipal Law Over Simhastha Kumbh Road Widening and Compensation || Calcutta High Court Orders DNA Tests to Ascertain Biological Identity in Alleged Baby-Swap Case || Bombay HC Confiscates Man's Phone for Filming Proceedings, Levies Rs. 10,000 Costs || Bombay HC: Accused Must Be Produced Before Court on Plea to Extend Investigation Period || Delhi High Court Directs Criminal Complaint Against Six CBI Officers for False Statement in Court

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :