SC: Advocate Must Protect Client Confidentiality Even after Client Turns Adversary || SC: Revenue Record Mutation Alone Cannot Defeat a Person’s Property Title || SC: SARFAESI Auction Valid Despite EMD Shortfall Where 25% Price Was Paid on Auction Day || SC: Extended GST Limitation under S.74 Requires Notice to Specify Fraud or Concealment || Allahabad HC Invalidates Key Provisions of Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Law || Delhi HC: Writ Courts Cannot Prescribe Method for Determining Property Tax || Bombay HC: ICC’s ‘No Sexual Element’ Finding Can Be Challenged under POSH Act || Rajasthan HC: Road Widening Demolition Requires Title Claims and Fair Hearing || Allahabad HC: Mere Presence or FIR Nomination is Insufficient for Conviction under Section 149 IPC || MP HC: Employment Secured Through Forged Records Gives No Right to Hold Public Office

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :