P&H High Court: Re-Investigation Cannot Nullify Existing Acquittal Despite Breach of Stay Order || Gujarat HC: Illegal Mining Vehicle Complaints Must Be Filed Before Sessions Court, Not Magistrate || Delhi High Court Lays Down Registry Directions for Dealing with Insufficiently Stamped Arbitral Award || Delhi High Court: Victims Need No Leave to Appeal Acquittal or Conviction for Lesser Offence || SC: Limitation Act Inapplicable to Revisions under Karnataka Land Revenue Act || SC: Banks Can Invoke SARFAESI for Loans Acquired from NBFCs Outside the Act || SC: Gujarat Prohibition Act Does not Bar Interim Seized Vehicle Release || Supreme Court Quashes Rs. 425-Crore Customs Penalty Based on AI-Generated Fake Case Laws || SC: Guilt cannot be Presumed Solely Due to Collusion Allegations against Investigating Officer || SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :