Supreme Court: Parents’ Loss Cannot Be Measured With Arithmetical Precision || Supreme Court: Registered Sale Deed Remains Valid Despite Minor Attestation Discrepancies || Calcutta High Court: Section 107 BNSS Property Attachment Cannot be Used as a Recovery Tool || Ker HC: Elected Representatives Must Swear by God or Affirm, Cannot Invoke Specific Deities in Oath || Rajasthan High Court: Ward Delimitation Must Rely on Population, Not Voter Count || SC: Readiness for Agreement Execution Must be Proven From Agreement Date, Not Only After Suit Filing || Supreme Court: Long Gap Without Similar Criminal Conduct May Mitigate Sentence || Supreme Court: Loss of Right Leg Constitutes 100% Functional Disability for a Mason || Del HC Orders Fresh All India Tennis Association Elections by Sept 30, Sets Timeline for Amendments || Bombay High Court Permits 26-Week Pregnancy Termination Due to Fetal Anomalies, Financial Hardship

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :