Supreme Court Explains: Debt Becoming Financial & Operational Debt || P&H HC: Model Code of Conduct Can’t Stand in Way of Execution of Judicial Order || Chh. HC: Can’t Build Matrimonial Home With Bricks & Stones, Love & Respect Between Spouses Required || Ker. HC: Fitting of Sensors in Buses Used as Stage Carriages Can’t be Insisted by Registration Author || Kar. HC: Can’t Consider Party’s Declaration, Promise of Policies as Corrupt Practise under RP Act || Bom. HC: Public Sector Banks Not Empowered to Issue Look Out Circulars Against Loan Defaulters || Mad. HC: Child Needs Safe & Caring Environment While Growing up, Corporal Punishment Not a Solution || Mad. HC: 2020 Amendment to Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, Struck Down || Del. HC: Persons Not Accused of Deceiving Others Should Handle Haj Pilgrims || Del. HC: Centre Directed to Decide Plea to Recruit Women Through CDS, Within Eight Weeks

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :