Supreme Court: Appellate Courts Cannot Overturn Trial Court Verdicts Without Independent Reasons || Supreme Court Acquits Three Men in 1979 Murder Case, Finding Serious Flaws in the Prosecution Case || Supreme Court: Magistrate Cannot Order Filing of Chargesheet After Police Submit Closure Report || Supreme Court: Landowners Cannot Claim Denial of Hearing After Failing to Avail the Opportunity || Supreme Court: Property in Sale Deed Cannot Be Altered by Rectification Without Transferor's Consent || Ahead of Rath Yatra, Orissa High Court Stays Release of 'Mahaprabhu Jagannath' Over Peace Concerns || Gujarat High Court: Ancient Hindu Law Did Not Recognise Adoption of Girls Before HAMA || Bombay High Court Orders DGP to Assess CCTV Systems and Footage Preservation at Police Stations || Allahabad HC: Mother Receiving Maintenance from Real Son Cannot Claim it from Step-Son || CCPA Imposes Rs.1 Lakh Penalty on SpiceJet Over Dark Patterns Used for Loyalty Programme Consent

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :