SC: Oraon Tribe Custom Doesn't Allow Uncle-In-Law to Adopt Niece's Husband as Ghar Damad || Kerala HC Approves New Public Prosecutor Appointment Guidelines After a Minor Revision || Rajasthan HC Clarifies Criminal Writ Petitions Have No Separate Constitutional Status || Delhi HC Clarifies if Whatsapp Acknowledgment Can Make an Arbitral Award Binding || Allahabad HC: Limitation Cannot be Extended Through Belated Representations or Letters || Madras HC: Private Schools Fall Outside RTI but Must Disclose Fee Structure || Bombay HC Orders Removal of AI-Made Deepfakes and Morphed Images of Preity Zinta || P&H HC: BNSS Pre-Cognizance Hearing Doesn't Apply to Serious Fraud Investigation Office Cases || Madras HC: Election Plea Becomes Infructuous After Assembly Term Ends, Barring Corruption || Supreme Court: Banks Cannot Effectively Blacklist Lawyers by Placing Them on Caution Lists

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :