Supreme Court: VAT is Not Applicable on Reliance’s Inter-State Gas Supply from KG Basin to UP || Supreme Court: Co-Owner Can File Eviction Suit as Landlord under Bombay Rent Act || Supreme Court: Mediclaim Reimbursement Cannot be Set off Against Accident Compensation || SC: Hindu Succession Act 2005 Amendment Does Not Curtail Daughters’ Existing Inheritance Rights || SC: Loans May be Treated as Deposits under MPID Act, Private Individuals as Financial Establishments || Supreme Court: Preventive Detention Unwarranted When Ordinary Law Suffices to Maintain Order || Supreme Court: Tenant’s Defence Cannot be Struck off Without Checking Wilful Rent Default || Allahabad High Court: Disposing Non-Veg Food in Ganga May Hurt Hindu Religious Sentiments || J&K&L High Court: Similarity With Police Dossier Alone Not Enough to Quash Preventive Detention || Patna High Court: Convict on Bail Can Still Seek Premature Release

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :