NCLAT: Consideration of Debt Restructuring by Lenders Doesn’t Bar Member from Initiating Proceedings || Delhi High Court: In Matters of Medical Evaluation, Courts Should Exercise Restraint || Delhi HC: Any Person in India Has Right to Legally Import Goods from Abroad and Sell the Same || Delhi HC: Waiver to Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act to be Given Once Tribunal is Constituted || Supreme Court Has Asked States to Regularise Existing Court Managers || SC: Union & States to Create Special POSCO Courts on Top Priority || SC Upholds Authority of CERC to Award Compensation for Delays || SC: Arbitral Tribunal Has Discretion to Include in Sum Awarded, Interest at Rate as it Deems Reasonab || SC: Cannot Use Article 142 to Frame Guidelines on Judicial Recusal || SC: Satisfaction Recorder in One EP Won’t Affect Subsequent EPs for Future Breaches

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :