Kerala HC: Online Publication of Interim Orders is Not Valid Service for Contempt Proceedings || MP High Court: Criminal Record Alone Doesn't Attract Organised Crime Charge under BNS || Allahabad HC: Insurance Company Cannot Challenge Welfare Scheme Compensation Through Writ || Supreme Court Proposes Denying Fuel to Vehicles Without Valid Insurance || Supreme Court: Media Can Report Court Proceedings Without Sharing Audio or Video Clips || Supreme Court: Acquits Murder Convict Jailed for 22 Years, Points to Criminal Justice System Failure || Supreme Court Directs Centre to Issue Environmental Compensation Norms under SWM Rules 2026 || Supreme Court: Employee Who Accepts Resignation Benefits Cannot Later Challenge its Acceptance || Supreme Court: Breach of Contract is Not Cheating Unless Fraud Existed From the Outset || Supreme Court: Specific Performance of an Agreement to Sell May be Denied After a Long Delay

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :