Supreme Court: Right to a Speedy Trial Cannot Override NDPS Act Bail Conditions || SC: Relatives Cannot be Implicated in Bigamy Solely Based on Knowledge of a Second Marriage || Supreme Court: Service Inam Land Attached to a Mosque Constitutes Waqf Property and is Inalienable || Supreme Court: Court Cannot Order an Accused to Surrender While Denying Anticipatory Bail || Supreme Court: Landlord’s Legal Heirs May Amend an Eviction Suit to Include Bona Fide Need || Supreme Court: Unsuccessful Party Can Invoke Section 9 of the Arbitration Act Even After an Award || Karnataka High Court: Accused Cannot be Required to Share Live GPS Location as a Condition of Bail || Guj HC: Plaintiff in Specific Performance Suit Must Prove Readiness &Willingness to Perform Contract || Madras HC: Transgenders are Children of God, Tragedy Lies in Society’s Blindness, Not Their Birth || Del HC: False Educational Qualification Declaration does not amount to Corrupt Practice U/S 123(4)

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :