Calcutta HC Denies Abhishek Banerjee Immediate Relief in DJ Remark Voice Sample Case || Bombay High Court Grants Bombay Group Relief in Vadilal Dispute Against Ahmedabad Group || Kerala HC Orders Time-Bound Disposal of Prisoners' Remission Pleas, Mandates NALSA SOP Compliance || Delhi HC Rejects Plea of Two Army Doctors Seeking NEET PG 2026 Exam Amid Eligibility Rule Challenge || Jharkhand HC: Mother Cannot Consent to a Major Son's DNA Test During a Pending Matrimonial Case || Bombay HC Rules on Whether Arrest is Illegal if Co-Accused Charge Sheet is Not Supplied Earlier || Gujarat HC: State Cannot Indefinitely Reserve Private Land Without Acquisition or Plan Revision || Chhattisgarh HC: Complaints Without Disciplinary Action Cannot Affect a Judge's Seniority || Delhi HC Upholds Selection of India's Dressage Team For the 2026 Asian Games || MP High Court Orders State to Airlift Gas Pipeline Blast Victim to Ahmedabad For Treatment

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :