SC Awards Rs.1 Lakh Compensation to Daily-Wage Workers in 25-Year-Old Bihar Dues Case || Supreme Court Questions Women’s Safety Progress, Orders CCTV, Lighting and Increased Police Patrols || Rajasthan HC: Passport can be Issued to Minor in Single Mother's Sole Custody without Father's Name || Rajasthan HC: One Voter's Absence cannot Halt Election or Warrant Re-Poll || Delhi HC: Stridhan Recovery Alone Cannot Justify Custodial Interrogation || Delhi HC: Rape Victim's Hearing Necessary before Bail is Granted to Accused || Gujarat HC: Family Suit Can Be Shifted to Wife’s Residence Due to Travel, Childcare Duties || Delhi High Court Orders NTA to Reissue Lost NEET-UG Scorecards to Foreign Medical Graduates || MP HC: Firearm Licence Suspension Unjustified Solely due to Criminal Case Pendency || Delhi HC: Re-Arrest Without Magistrate's Permission Invalid if Earlier Arrest was Vitiated

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :