Kerala HC: Persons With Down Syndrome Get Protection and Guardianship under National Trust Act, 1999 || J&K&L HC: Contractual Staff Cannot Claim Payment Beyond Contract Period Without Proving Work || J&K&L HC: Revisional Powers U/S 15 Must be Exercised in Reasonable Time, Not After 20-Year Delay || MP High Court: Revoking Building Permission Without Fraud Proof Violates Right to Property || Madras HC: Centre’s Consent For Remission is Needed only When Sentence under Central Act is Ongoing || Delhi HC: Private School Employees Entitled to Child Care Leave Equivalent to Government Employees || Supreme Court Has Released Draft Regulations on AI Use in the Judiciary and Invited Public Feedback || Supreme Court: MMDR Act Royalty Hikes Prevail over Contractual Terms || Delhi HC: Daughter-In-Law Has No Independent Right in Mother-In-Law’s Self-Acquired House || SC: Prolonged Separation Can Constitute Cruelty and Desertion

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :