NCLAT Sets Aside Insolvency, Imposes ?10L Costs Following Recusal over Attempt to Influence Member || J&K&L HC: Sec 195 CrPC Bars Cognizance Without Public Servant's Complaint, Not FIR or Investigation || Allahabad HC: Preliminary Issues Barred if Raised 18 Years After Issues Were Framed in a Suit || Guj HC: No Prior Hearing Needed to Dismiss Cop After Corruption Conviction under Article 311(2)(A) || Madras HC: Senior Citizens Act Applies Only To Post-2007 Property Transfers, Not Retrospective || Supreme Court: Private Insurer Not Liable For Accident by Vehicle under State Requisition || SC: Reserved Candidates Can Claim General Seats on Merit with Relaxation if Rules Allow || SC: No Vested Right to Appointment For Next Candidate if Selected One Doesn't Join || Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award, Rules State Cannot Be Judge in its Own Dispute Case || Delhi HC: Girl Being Friendly on Valentine’s Day Does Not Justify Forced Sexual Activity under POCSO

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :