SC: Public Premises Act Prevails over State Rent Laws For Evicting Unauthorised Occupants || SC: Doctors Were Unwavering Heroes in COVID-19, and Their Sacrifice Remains Indelible || SC Sets Up Secondary Medical Board to Assess Passive Euthanasia Plea of Man in Vegetative State || NCLAT: Amounts Listed As ‘Other Advances’ in Company’s Balance Sheet aren’t Financial Debt under IBC || NCLT Ahmedabad: Objections to Coc Cannot Bar RP From Challenging Preferential Transactions || J&K&L HC: Courts Should Exercise Caution When Granting Interim Relief in Public Infrastructure Cases || Bombay HC: SARFAESI Sale Invalid if Sale Certificate is Not Issued Prior to IBC Moratorium || Supreme Court: Police May Freeze Bank Accounts under S.102 CrPC in Prevention of Corruption Cases || SC: Arbitrator’s Mandate Ends on Time Expiry; Substituted Arbitrator Must Continue After Extension || SC: Woman May Move Her Department’s ICC For Harassment by Employee of Another Workplace

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :