Rajya Sabha Passes Oilfields (Regulation and Development) Amendment Bill, 2024 || Lok Sabha passes Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2024 || Bharatiya Vayuyan Vidheyak, 2024 tabled in Rajya Sabha || Supreme Court Issues Directions for Effective Compliance of POSH Act, 2013 || Cal. HC: Person Claiming Non-Access to a Relationship Has Right to Prove the Same || Del. HC: Judgment Requiring ED to Supply ‘Reasons to Believe’ to Arrestee to be Applied Prospectively || SC: Right to Get Legal Aid is a Fundamental Right of Accused, Guaranteed by Article 21 of COI || Raj. HC: Candidate's rejection merely because he suffered disability below the minimum degree illegal || Calcutta HC Allows Bail Application of Former TMC aide Ayan Sil in Recruitment Scam Case || SC Stays Contempt Proceedings in Gujarat High Court Against Judicial Officer

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :