SC: Dismissal, Being the Severest Punishment, Should be Imposed Only For Grave Misconduct || SC: Constructive Res Judicata Applies to Grounds Omitted Through Negligence or Inadvertence || Madras High Court: Honour Killing is a Shameful Act and an Extreme Manifestation of Casteism || Bombay High Court: Traditional Families Often Hesitate to Report Sexual Offences || Jharkhand High Court Directs Circle Officers to Digitally Verify Land Records and Remove Mismatches || MP High Court: Writ Court Cannot Grant Interim Relief Once Party is Relegated to Alternate Forum || Supreme Court Issues Directions to Speed Up MACT Claims Amid Six-Year Average Pendency || Supreme Court: Sex Selection Practices Continues Due to Preference For Male Children || Supreme Court: Injury From a Fallen Tree is Not a Motor Accident for MACT Claims || Madras HC: Recent Tamil Nadu Elections Reflect Voting Beyond Caste and Community Considerations

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :