Allahabad HC Detains Woman IO till 4 PM, Fines her Rs.5K for not Seizing POCSO Accused’s Mobile || Allahabad HC Questions Fake Victim Age Certificates in POCSO Cases; UP Government Drafts Guidelines || Gujarat HC: ‘Self-Negligence’ Bars Compensation to Heirs of Driver Killed at Unmanned Crossing || UK Court of Appeal Dismisses India's Bid to Challenge Arbitration over Andhra Bauxite Project || CCPA Imposes Rs. 1 Lakh Penalty on Britannia Over Misleading ‘100% Whole Wheat Bread’ Claim || Delhi High Court Upholds SEM Notice Asking Neha Bora to Sign Peace Bond Beyond Mere Hearsay || Allahabad High Court: Rape Victims Cannot Be Denied Compensation for Lack of Medical Report || Kerala High Court Quashes Guideline Restricting Production of Arrested Persons After 5 PM || Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal of Two in Electric Fence Death of 11-Year-Old || MP High Court Allows Tree Felling for Indore Metro, Orders Phased Cutting under Expert Watch

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :