Supreme Court: Banks Cannot Effectively Blacklist Lawyers by Placing Them on Caution Lists || Madras HC: Advocates Can't Seek Out-of-Turn Case Listing Through Writ Petitions || J&K&L HC: Vehicle Can't Remain in Police Custody During NDPS Trial over Possible Confiscation || J&K&L HC: Prolonged Stagnation in Small Cadres Does Not Grant Right to Promotion || Delhi HC Rejects Bail Plea of Athar Khan in Alleged Delhi Riots Conspiracy || Delhi HC Full Bench: School Employee's Suspension Ends if DOE Approval Isn't Given in 15 Days || Allahabad HC: Mere Note of Failed Conciliation Not Sufficient for Lok Adalat Proceedings || Delhi HC: Govt Created 'Utter Chaos' in OBC Reservation Rules Through Conflicting Notifications || Calcutta HC: Acceptance of Rent After Quit Notice Doesn't Waive Tenancy Termination || Delhi HC Flags EFI Selection Criteria Breach in Asian Games Dressage Team, Declines to Interfere

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :