Kerala High Court: ED Can Investigate Without FIR in Scheduled Offence Cases (CMRL Matter) || Delhi High Court Upholds TRAI Rule Capping TV Advertisements at 12 Minutes Per Hour || Supreme Court Directs High Courts to Deliver Judgments in 3 Months and Bail Orders in One Day || Supreme Court: Successful Resolution Applicant Cannot Negotiate Further After CoC Approval || Supreme Court: Succession Law Applies, Not Primogeniture, to Ex-Royal’s Private Estate Inheritance || Supreme Court: Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Challenge Arbitrator’s Section 16 Decision || Supreme Court: Sanyasi Status Cannot Be Ground to Reject Land Compensation Claim || Supreme Court: Section 33(1)(a) of Arbitration Act Cannot Alter Nature of Interest in Award || Supreme Court: Society Office Bearers Not Liable for Cheque Dishonour Without Active Business Role || Supreme Court: Asking a Woman to Adjust in Marriage Does Not Amount to Cruelty By In-Laws

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :