Madras High Court Upholds Appointment of District Judges as Tamil Nadu Lokayukta Secretary || Allahabad High Court: IO’s Mere Apprehension Cannot Justify Withholding Seized Items || Patna High Court: Mere Sight of Spouse in Compromising Position doesn't Prove Adultery || Sikkim High Court: POCSO Case not Quashed on Settlement after Survivor Turns Major || Chhattisgarh High Court: Backward Classes Commission Cannot Decide Private Commercial Disputes || SC: Futures & Options Investors Cannot Recover Trading Losses From Professional Clearing Members || Supreme Court: NCTE Executive Committee Can Seek Annual Reports From Teacher Education Institutes || SC: S.362 CrPC Cannot Limit HC’s Inherent Power to Recall Judgment Causing Miscarriage of Justice || Supreme Court Upholds RBI’s Power to Supersede Multi-State Co-op Bank Boards Beyond Six Months || Supreme Court: Retaining Victim in a Specific Role Cannot Reduce Functional Disability

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :