SC: Bribe Recovery Alone Cannot Prove Guilt without Proof of Demand under PC Act || SC: Cut Power, Water to Bulk Waste Generators Violating Solid Waste Rules || SC: RPF Employee Who Conceals Criminal Case Can be Discharged at Any Stage || SC: Police can Register FIR Despite Magistrate Rejecting S.156(3) CrPC Application || SC: Criminal Acquittal Alone Cannot Prove Absence of Negligence in Accident Claims || SC: Referral Fees Earned By Auto Dealers for Bank, Insurance Promotion Taxable as Service Tax || Supreme Court Revisits the definition of “Industry”: 9-Judge Bench Reformulates the 1978 Triple Test || Delhi HC: Exam Integrity is a Shared Duty of Candidates and Authorities || Delhi High Court: POCSO Allows Child Witness Cross-Examination but Bars Aggressive Questioning || Kerala HC: Christian Women May File Divorce Pleas Where They Reside

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :