Bihar Tender Scam: Patna High Court Bars Media From Calling Accused 'Scamster' Before Trial || Gujarat HC Terms Plea ‘Wholly Misconceived’ and Imposes Rs. 2 Lakh Cost over ASI Somnath Survey || Gauhati HC Differs on Whether ED’s ‘Reason To Believe’ For Property Attachment is Confidential || MP High Court Grants Bail To Tehelka Journalist, Noting Implication After Exposing Foeticide Racket || Patna HC: Possessing Cough Syrup With under 2.5% Codeine Without Authorisation Attracts the NDPS Act || Madras HC: Person Who Converts to Islam Cannot Claim Backward Class Muslim Status || Madras High Court Lays Down Guidelines For Surrogacy Custody and Parentage Applications || Bombay High Court: Residence Proof is Mandatory For RTE Neighbourhood School Admissions || Madras HC Strikes Down TN Law Mandating Registrar’s Title Verification Before Property Registration || Bombay HC Allows Galli News to Report Medical Negligence But Bars Defamatory Hospital Imputations

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :