SC: CIRP Need Not Be Set Aside Solely for Fraudulent Filing of Section 9 Plea || Supreme Court: Compromise Decree Passed Without Impleading Necessary Party is Void || SC: Cheque Dishonour Notice Valid if Sent to Drawer’s Address and Received by Family || J&K&L HC: Minority During Attestation Cannot Justify Decades-Long Delay in Challenging Mutation || Bombay HC: WhatsApp Circulation of Objectionable Photos Can Attract SC/ST Act || J&K&L HC: Cardiac Arrest From Stress of Long-Distance Driving is Compensable || Delhi HC: Accused Cannot Delay Trial and Then Rely on Delay to Seek Bail || Calcutta HC: Insurer Must Compensate Child’s Accidental Death Despite Driver’s Fake Licence || Bombay HC Tells X to Take Down Defamatory Post Targeting Serum Institute, CEO Adar Poonawalla || Delhi High Court Restores Arbitral Award in DMRC’s Favour Passed by Employee-Arbitrator

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :