MP High Court: Estranged Husband Entitled to Loss of Consortium Compensation After Wife’s Death || J&K & Ladakh HC: Claims under Roshni Act Void Ab Initio, Ownership Rights Null from Inception || Madras High Court Directs Expedited Trials in 216 Pending Criminal Cases Against MPs and MLAs || MP High Court: Allowing Minor to Drive Without Valid License Constitutes Breach of Insurance Policy || Punjab & Haryana High Court: Cyber Fraud Cases Uphold Public Trust, Cannot Be Quashed by Compromise || SC: Customer-Banker Relationship Based on Mutual Trust, Postmaster’s Reinstatement Quashed || Supreme Court: Company Buying Software for Efficiency and Profit Is Not a ‘Consumer’ under CPA || SC: Long Custody or Trial Delay Not Ground for Bail in Commercial Narcotic Cases if S.37 Unmet || Calcutta HC Disqualifies Politician Mukul Roy from Assembly under Anti-Defection Law || Supreme Court Bans Mining in and Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :