Supreme Court Unveiled Victim Protection Plan For Trafficking Survivors and Urged Legal Reforms || Supreme Court Cautioned Against the Misuse of False POCSO Cases in Matrimonial Disputes || Supreme Court Cautioned Against the Misuse of False POCSO Cases in Matrimonial Disputes || SC: Assigning Mathadhipati’s Secular Duties to Govt Officer Violates Art 26, Undermines Mahantship || Supreme Court: All MIDC Units are Exempt From Property Tax Until Services are Transferred to NMMC || Supreme Court: All MIDC Units are Exempt From Property Tax Until Services are Transferred to NMMC || SC: Arbitral Award Unenforceable if Invoked During Pending Civil Suit Without Court’s Permission || Delhi High Court: Participation in Protests Can't Be a Ground to Deny Bail in PMLA Case || Delhi High Court Lays Down Guidelines to Mask Personal Details in Orders under Right to be Forgotten || Raj HC: Poverty Cannot Defeat Right to Bail and Accused Cannot be Jailed For Lack of Sureties

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :