SC: DRT Auction Sale Valid Despite Failure to Serve Order XXI Rule 22 Notice || SC: Legal Representatives Entitled to Motor Accident Compensation without Financial Dependency || SC: Re-Employed Officers May be Classified Differently from Regular Officers || Supreme Court Questions Union's Opposition to Global Food Package Labelling Norms || SC: S.42 NDPS Act Compliance Need Not be Absolute When Immediate Seizure is Required || SC Clarifies Whether Tenancy Ends after Landlord-Tenant Execute Agreement to Sell || SC Levies Rs. 10 Lakh Cost on Reliance Industries for Hindering 20-Year-Old NTPC Suit || P&H HC: Authorities Obligated to Act if Protests Escalate into Violence || Allahabad HC: Allottee Aware of Reduced Lease Area Not Entitled to Full Zero-Period Benefit || Delhi HC: 2015 Commercial Courts Act Applicable to Suits Instituted Before its Enactment

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :