SC: Revisional Jurisdiction Cannot Correct Factual Errors Despite Alleged Concealment || Supreme Court: Wrong Statement in Pleadings is Not Always a False Statement, Perjury Case Quashed || SC: Under JJ Act, Murder Falls Within Heinous Offences; S. 302 IPC Prescribes Minimum Life Sentence || Supreme Court: Cognisance of FERA Complaint is Invalid Without Prior Notice to the Accused || Supreme Court: Terror Cases Cannot Curtail Constitutional Safeguards and the Right to Fair Trial || Supreme Court: Terror Cases Cannot Curtail Constitutional Safeguards and the Right to Fair Trial || SC Upheld Husband's Conviction For Murdering His Wife over an Extramarital Affair || J&K&L High Court: Mere Admission of Issuing Cheque is Not a Plea of Guilt under S.138 NI Act || Calcutta HC: Aadhaar Card Prima Facie Establishes Occupation; Demolition Without Notice is Unlawful || Gauhati High Court: Wildlife Law Doesn't Bar Trade in Unprotected Ornamental Fish Species

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :