Supreme Court Issues Directions to Speed Up MACT Claims Amid Six-Year Average Pendency || Supreme Court: Sex Selection Practices Continues Due to Preference For Male Children || Supreme Court: Injury From a Fallen Tree is Not a Motor Accident for MACT Claims || Madras HC: Recent Tamil Nadu Elections Reflect Voting Beyond Caste and Community Considerations || Supreme Court: Children Should Not Undergo Psychological Tests in Custody Cases Unless Necessary || Jharkhand HC: Lokayukta Cannot Delegate Core Adjudicatory Powers Even in Case Against Brother || Ker HC: Complainant Can Invoke Presumptions After Proving Transaction, Cheque Execution Convincingly || Supreme Court Cancels SARFAESI Auction Sale After 16 Years Due to a 5-Day Payment Delay || Jhar HC Orders 2-Month Probe Deadline, DGP Monitoring to Overhaul Sexual Violence Response in State || Delhi HC: Social Media Cannot Undermine Judiciary; Intermediaries Must Act Without Court Orders

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :