Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists || Kerala High Court: Disability Pension is Payable to Voluntary Dischargee For Service-Related Illness || Calcutta High Court: Partition Decree is Executable Only After Stamp Duty Payment || Calcutta HC: Contempt Court Cannot Grant New Relief Beyond Original Order Once Compliance is Met || Kerala High Court: Intentional Judicial Decisions Cannot be Altered as Clerical Errors under CPC || Supreme Court: Delay In Filing Appeals under Section 74 of 2013 Land Acquisition Act is Condonable || SC: Statutory Authorities may Intervene When Housing Societies Delay Membership Decisions || SC: Quasi-Judicial Authorities Cannot Exercise Review Powers Unless Expressly Granted By Statute || SC: Special Court Cannot Order Confiscation While Appeal Against Attachment Confirmation is Pending || SC: Photocopies are Not Evidence Unless Conditions for Leading Secondary Evidence are Proved

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :