SC: Appeal U/S 374 CrPC/415 BNSS is Not Maintainable Against Sessions Court's Reversal of Acquittal || SC Asked the Centre to Promote Awareness About the Consequences of Driving With an Expired Licence || SC Explains How a Deceased Christian Wife's Property Devolves under the Indian Succession Act || Supreme Court: Reach Stacker isn't a Motor Vehicle; MACT Claim Not Maintainable || Supreme Court: Lift Makers, Operators and Owners Share Responsibility for User Safety || Patna HC: Pressure to Sign Divorce and Child Custody does not Amount to Cruelty || Bombay HC: Externment under the Police Act Requires Satisfaction About a Gang's Activities || Bombay HC: False Travel Distance Claim Alone Doesn't Constitute Misappropriation || J&K&L High Court: Interest on Delayed Gratuity is Not a Mandatory Pre-Deposit For an Appeal || Meghalaya HC: Meritorious Candidate Cannot Be Denied Admission For a Two-Minute Delay

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :