Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Abolish Hanging, Says Centre Can Explore Alternative Methods || Supreme Court: Sentences With Life Imprisonment Must Run Concurrently, Not Consecutively || SC: Insurer Not Liable Beyond Sum Assured Without Advance Premium Payment || Supreme Court: Illegal Appointments Cannot Be Regularised Due to Long Service || SC: Courts Should Not Interfere Late in Tender Processes; Challenges Must Be Prompt || Delhi HC: UAPA Default Bail Triggered after 180 Days, Not 90 under BNSS || Madras HC: No Place for Caste Discrimination in Temples, God Treats All Equally || Bombay HC: Public Authorities Need Not Obtain Third-Party Information for RTI Applicants || Delhi HC Levies Rs.5 Lakh Costs on Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited over Sham Plea || Delhi HC: False Marriage Promise Invalidates Consent Only if it Taints Consent

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :