J&K&L High Court: Maternity Leave is a Constitutional Right and Cannot be Treated as State Charity || P&H High Court: Second Anticipatory Bail Plea is Not Maintainable After Supreme Court Rejection || Bombay High Court: No Prior Sanction is Required to Prosecute Police For Custodial Assault || Allahabad High Court: Strict Proof of Marriage is Unnecessary if Couple Lived as Husband and Wife || Delhi High Court: UP Passport Disputes Cannot be Filed in Delhi Only Because MEA is Based There || Bombay High Court: Revenue Officers Cannot Decide Caste Status to Remove Tribal Land Protections || Calcutta High Court: Punjab National Bank Liable to Compensate Farmers For Crop Insurance Lapse || Calcutta High Court: Joint Settlement of Liquor Licence is Allowed if All Eligible Heirs Consent || Delhi High Court Holds Multiple Sclerosis is a Specified Disability under the RPWD Act || Allahabad High Court: An Alibi Must be Proved at Trial and Cannot be Accepted by the IO Alone

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :