SC: Readiness for Agreement Execution Must be Proven From Agreement Date, Not Only After Suit Filing || Supreme Court: Long Gap Without Similar Criminal Conduct May Mitigate Sentence || Supreme Court: Loss of Right Leg Constitutes 100% Functional Disability for a Mason || Del HC Orders Fresh All India Tennis Association Elections by Sept 30, Sets Timeline for Amendments || Bombay High Court Permits 26-Week Pregnancy Termination Due to Fetal Anomalies, Financial Hardship || Uttarakhand High Court: NH Act Authority Cannot Challenge Collector-Fixed Circle Rate || Consumer Court Directs Amazon, Seller to Pay Rs.4.68 Lakh to Customer as Compensation || MP HC: Pension is a Proprietary Right and Cannot be Withheld unless Grave Misconduct is Proved || HP High Court: ITBP Constable Removal For Affair Disproportionate; Orders Compulsory Retirement || Calcutta High Court: Trade Licence Not Required For Advocates’ Partnership Registration

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :