Supreme Court Raises Concerns over MACT Rulings, Seeks Clear and Well-Reasoned Findings || Supreme Court Revives over Rs.16 Crore Service Tax Demand Against BPCL and HPCL in CNG Sales Case || Supreme Court Reduces Gang Rape Convict's Sentence to 20 Years, Cites Reform Prospects || Rajasthan High Court: NI and Commercial Court Proceedings Equal, Grants Accused Original Records || Bombay HC: Officials, Not Taxpayers, Must Pay For Losses From Illegal Project Cancellations || Karnataka HC: Major Unmarried Daughter can Claim PG Education Costs under Domestic Violence Act || Punjab & Haryana HC Calls For Wisdom Amid Lawyers' Strike over LADCS || Kerala HC Orders SIT to Conclude Sabarimala Gold Theft Probe After National Metallurgical Lab Report || Delhi HC Lifts Gag Order on the Wire; Prior Restraint in Defamation Not Sustainable || Delhi HC: Parents Fined Rs.2 Lakh over False Birth Date for School Admission

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :