Supreme Court: Spouse Cannot Withdraw Consent for Mutual Divorce After Settlement Agreement || Supreme Court Suspends PC Act Sentence of Former Minister Anosh Ekka, Flags Overlapping CBI Cases || Supreme Court: Magistrate’s Probe Order Can’t be Quashed on Accused’s Defence || Delhi High Court: No Adverse Inference if Handwriting Sample Refused Without Section 73 Disclosure || J&K&L HC: Bank Officials Not Entitled to Section 197 CrPC Protection Despite Public Servant Status || Kar HC Orders CBI Probe into 53-Acre Land Acquisition, Citing Alleged Monumental Fraud & Conspiracy || Supreme Court Grants Probation to Convicts; Rules Fine-Only Cases Also Eligible || SC Disposes Plea on Allied Health Course Moratorium After NCAHP Issues 2026–27 Guideline || Supreme Court Grants Promotion Relief to Employee Denied Relaxation, Calling it Discrimination || Patna HC: Tender Lapses if Not Extended on Time & Delay Cannot be Cured by Repeated Representations

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :