Supreme Court: Breach of Contract is Not Cheating Unless Fraud Existed From the Outset || Supreme Court: Specific Performance of an Agreement to Sell May be Denied After a Long Delay || Supreme Court: Section 498A IPC Applies to Live-In Relationships in Nature of Marriage || Supreme Court Awards Rs.83.38 Lakh to Child Left Paralysed, Stressing Impact on the Victim’s Future || J&K and Ladakh High Court: Private Trust Cannot Oppose Wakf Takeover Without Legal Authority || P&H HC: Courts Cannot Grant Protection to a Minor’s Live-In Relationship Prohibited By Law || Chhattisgarh High Court: NEET OMR Tampering Allegations Cannot Rest on Mere Suspicion || Allahabad High Court Upholds Conviction, Says a Reliable Dying Declaration Alone Can Sustain Guilt || Bombay HC Criticises ITAT for Delays in Pronouncing Orders Beyond 90-Day Limit || P&H High Court Criticises Punjab For Spending on Freebies and Ads While Delaying Employee Dues

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :