Supreme Court Upholds the Constitutionality of Life Sentences Without Remission Until Natural Death || Supreme Court: Service Benefits Can't be Refused Due to Missing ACRs Not Attributable to Employees || Supreme Court: Courts May Grant Lesser Relief under Order VII Rule 7 CPC, But Not a Different Claim || Supreme Court Dismisses Lokpal's Plea Against Delhi HC Order Quashing Probe into Defence Secretary || SC Grants Bail to Two UAPA Accused, Citing 12-Year Incarceration and Violation of Article 21 || Madras High Court: Seeking Divorce over Wife's Accidental Hip Injury is Inhumane || Kerala High Court Directs Stronger Audit and Financial Oversight in Guruvayur Devaswom || Madras High Court Directs State and Judiciary to Expedite Rape and POCSO Trials || Karnataka HC Upholds RTO's Power to Cancel Registration Secured by False Documents || Karnataka HC: Bengaluru-Mysuru Corridor Could be Biggest Scam, Farmers Deprived of Land

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :