Bombay HC: Clarifies Procedure for Executing Foreign Decrees || Supreme Court: Bureaucratic Delay No Excuse || Supreme Court Grants Full Disability Pension Arrears to Veterans || Delhi HC: Workman Cannot Claim Section 17(B) of the ID Act Wages after Reaching Superannuation Age || Allahabad HC: Caste by Birth Remains Unchanged Despite Conversion or Inter-Caste Marriage || Delhi High Court: Tweeting Corruption Allegations Against Employer Can Constitute Misconduct || Delhi High Court: State Gratuity Authorities Lack Jurisdiction over Multi-State Establishments || Kerala High Court: Arrest Grounds Need Not Mention Contraband Quantity When No Seizure is Made || SC: Silence During Investigation Does Not Ipso Facto Mean Non-Cooperation to Deny Bail || Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Re-Examine Answer Keys Even in Judicial Service Exams

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :