Supreme Court Explains that Comprehensive Motor Insurance Covers Occupants of a Vehicle || Supreme Court: Judgments Operate Retrospectively Unless Made Prospective || Supreme Court Clarifies Principles Governing Witness Recall under Order 18 Rule 17 of CPC || Gujarat High Court: Res Judicata Prevents Trustees from Reopening Trust Property Disputes || Allahabad HC: Trial Courts Cannot Examine Witnesses to Generate Fresh Evidence Before Cognizance || Rajasthan HC: Funds Collected From an Illegal Toll Plaza Must Be Used For Tree Plantation || Delhi HC: Minor’s Signature Alone Cannot Establish Consent for Pregnancy Termination || Karnataka HC Allows ECIR Challenge under Article 226, Rejects ED’s Immunity Claim || Allahabad High Court Upholds Transfer of a Dissolved Society's Assets to its Successor Company || P&H HC: Cheque Bounce Cases Remain Compoundable Even After Appellate Courts Uphold Conviction

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :