Supreme Court Urged Railways to Drop the Term Second-Class Passengers || Supreme Court: Employers Cannot Deny Compassionate Appointments Through Delays || Supreme Court Explains How Testimony of a Dead Witness Can be Used Against an Absconding Accused || SC Recommended Amending IBC to Ensure Fair Repayment Protection for MSME Operational Creditors || Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Reappreciate Evidence in Certiorari Jurisdiction || SC: Railways are Not Liable Unless Owner-Risk Goods Were Counted or Weighed || SC: Courts and Prosecutors Must Expedite Trials For Jailed Accused || Supreme Court Clarifies that Swear Words and Vulgar Expletives Alone do Not Constitute Obscenity || Supreme Court: Nominated Town Panchayat Members Have No Voting Rights in Council Polls || Delhi High Court Declines Interim Relief to Sonam Wangchuk, Upholds His Hospitalization

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :