Kerala High Court Sets Aside Order Transferring School Playground, Citing Inadequate Consideration || Delhi High Court Directs Removal of Unauthorised Vendors, Declares Nehru Place a No-Vending Zone || Kerala High Court: SHO Cannot Order Surrender of Firearms over Phone Calls Before Elections || Kerala High Court: SHO Cannot Order Surrender of Firearms over Phone Calls Before Elections || Chhattisgarh HC Refuses Bail to Aide of Former Congress Treasurer in ?540 Crore Coal Levy Case || Kerala HC Rejects Plea Against Appointment of VS Achuthanandan’s Son as IHRD Director-In-Charge || Rajasthan HC: Transgender Bill May Make Gender Identity Rights Dependent on State Approval || J&K&L HC: Bail is Not Absolute For Juveniles in Heinous Cases and Can be Denied to Serve Justice || Delhi HC: Expired Driving Licenses Do Not Enjoy Deemed Continuity After 2019 MV Act Amendment || MP High Court: Ex-Gratia Payments are Dependents’ Last Hope and Rules Should be Applied Liberally

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :