Allahabad HC Explains: Does Conversion Automatically Strip a Person of Scheduled Tribe Status? || Delhi HC Rejects Vimal Elaichi Plea against FDA Notice to Shah Rukh Khan, Ajay Devgn, Tiger Shroff || Calcutta HC Upholds Jail Term for Owner Over Unauthorised Construction under Roof-Repair Permit || P&H HC: 'Judges Must Have Spine to Do Justice'; 76-Year-Old PMLA Accused Gets Bail on Ill-Health || Punjab & Haryana HC: Bail Granted to Two More UGC NET Paper Leak Accused, Including Kingpin || Kerala HC: Police Cover for Big TV Journalist Threatened over Muslim Scholar's Remarks || SC: Electricity Dues over 2 Years Recoverable only if Shown Continuously as Outstanding || Allahabad HC Criticises UP Govt for Using Goondas Act as a ‘Tool of Oppression’ || Gujarat HC: Complaint Made in Good Faith does not Amount to Defamation || Allahabad HC: Bar Association Membership Disputes Are Private, Outside Writ Jurisdiction

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :