J&K&L HC: Repeat Narcotics Offences After Release Can Justify Preventive Detention || SC: Departmental Enquiry Required for Police Arrests Without Written Grounds || SC: Preliminary Issue Cannot Be Tried Separately Once Trial on All Issues Has Begun || SC: Police Claim of Sufficient Material for Chargesheet Does Not Entitle Accused to Default Bail || Telangana HC: Father’s Role Beyond Financial Support Cannot Be Overlooked in Custody Matters || Allahabad HC: Hindu Marriage Requires Essential Ceremonies, Arya Samaj Certificate Not Enough || Delhi HC: Narco Test Cannot Be Forced on an Accused Without Consent || Gujarat HC: Brothel Customer Not Liable for Operating Premises or Procuring Women || MP HC: Civil Suits May Be Consolidated Where Issues and Evidence Are Common || J&K&L HC: Personal-Enmity Assaults Concern Law and Order, Not Preventive Detention

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :