Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order || Supreme Court: Certiorari Can Quash a Tribunal Decision That is Grossly Perverse || Supreme Court: Informant’s Consent is Not Required to Quash a Case Settled With the Victim || Madras High Court: False Posts Against a Minister are Not an Offence Without Intent to Cause Alarm || Delhi High Court: Police Cannot Pick and Choose Among Accused Persons for Arrest || J&K High Court: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 and are Outside Writ Jurisdiction || Calcutta High Court: Third Parties Can Challenge Inaction Against Unauthorised Construction || Madras High Court: Being an Advocate Does Not Mean a Person Cannot Commit an Offence || Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Reopen Settled Marital Disputes to Avoid Maintenance Liability || Calcutta High Court: State Cannot Deny CRMI Seats to Foreign Medical Graduates Citing Stipend Costs

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :