Supreme Court: State Cannot Acquire Temple Property Through Gift Deed || Supreme Court: HC Registry Should Exclude Court Vacations When Listing Cases After Fixed Days || Supreme Court Flags Stark Non-Compliance With Directions on CAPF Cadre Review || Supreme Court: Internet Access and Use is a Fundamental Right, Including for Children || Supreme Court: Letters Patent Bench Cannot Interfere Merely Over Errors of Fact or Law || Supreme Court: Voters May File Complaints Against Candidates over False Affidavits under RP Act || Madras HC: Using Children in Campaign is Inappropriate but Does Not Invalidate Election || Allahabad HC: Section 69 BNS Cannot Be Invoked by Transgender Woman in False Marriage Promise Case || Delhi High Court Permits Britannia’s ‘No Added Sugar, Maida or Palm Oil’ Claim on Biscuit Packs || Calcutta High Court Bars Deportation of Alleged Bangladeshi Woman until CAA Application is Decided

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :