Supreme Court Allows Cross-Examination on Brand Use Despite Written Statement Not Being on Record || Supreme Court: Enquiry Needed Before Dismissal for Suppressing Criminal Antecedents || Supreme Court: Trading While Holding Confidential Information Indicates Insider Trading || Supreme Court Explains Four-Step Test to Quash Criminal Cases Using Defence Material || Supreme Court Acquits Man in Minor Rape Case, Flags HC's Medical Evidence Lapse || Bombay HC: Minor’s Inability to Describe Sexual Act No Ground to Reject Her Testimony || Delhi HC: Wife’s Interim Maintenance Cannot be Based Solely on Husband’s Income || Calcutta HC: SLSA Cannot Adopt ‘Big Brother’ Approach Over Adult Victims’ Compensation || Allahabad HC: Further Investigation Permissible Even After Final Report is Accepted || Allahabad HC: Court-Directed Award Cannot be Challenged for Not Computing Market Value

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :