Delhi HC: Govt Created 'Utter Chaos' in OBC Reservation Rules Through Conflicting Notifications || Calcutta HC: Acceptance of Rent After Quit Notice Doesn't Waive Tenancy Termination || Delhi HC Flags EFI Selection Criteria Breach in Asian Games Dressage Team, Declines to Interfere || Delhi High Court Safeguards Ravi Kishan's Personality Rights From Misuse || Cal HC: Wife’s Ancestral Property Claim Can Amount to Dowry Demand if Made under Husband's Pressure || Gujarat HC: Sessions Court Prima Facie Overreach Bail Jurisdiction by Ordering Executive Action || Kerala HC: Re-Arrest is Allowed After an Illegal Arrest With Prior Judicial Approval || Madras High Court: Section 15(2) Safeguards Need Not Apply to Searches in Commercial Spas || Supreme Court: Proof of Attestation Alone Doesn't Establish Will's Genuineness || Delhi HC: Education Department Cannot Restrict Recruitment in Aided Minority Schools

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :