SC: Filing a False FIR Alone does not Amount to Abetment of Suicide || SC: Police Cannot Probe Offences under Pre-Conception & Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act || SC: UP Gangsters Act Creates no Offence, Perpetuates Violence against Citizens || SC: Caste Abuse in Private Space without Public Presence is not SC/ST Act Offence || SC Reduces Judicial Service Practice Norm to 1 Year; Mandates Training & Clerkship || SC: Wife’s Income does not Reduce Father’s Duty to Maintain Children || SC: Government Cannot Revisit PSC Eligibility Decision When Service Rules Make it Final || Allahabad HC: S.34 IPC Applies if Co-Accused Shares a ‘Functional Relationship’ with Offence || P&H High Court: PSC Cannot Introduce Minimum Interview Marks After Medical Faculty Selection Begins || MP HC: Comprehensive Insurance Doesn't Mean Unlimited Passenger Liability Without Terms

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :