Supreme Court: Foreign Judgment Unenforceable in India Without Fair Opportunity to Defend || Supreme Court: High Court Cannot Decide Appeal Pending Before Statutory Authority Due to Delay || Supreme Court: SDO Lacks Authority to Change Land Classification under UP Zamindari Abolition Act || Supreme Court: Man Not Liable For Maintenance if DNA Test Proves He is Not the Child’s Father || SC: Prison Must Not Dilute Rights of Disabled Inmates; Oversight Given to High-Powered Panel || Delhi High Court: Judges Would Have to Recuse if Children as Central Govt Counsel is Treated as Bias || Delhi HC: Fresh Tenders Allowed Despite Existing Contracts; Anticipatory Grievances Not Entertained || Delhi High Court: Judges Cannot Respond Publicly; Criticism Must Be Responsible and Evidence-Based || J&K&L High Court: IO Not Bound By FIR; Can Modify Offences in Final Chargesheet U/S 173 CrPC || Supreme Court: Brief Service Breaks Do Not Bar Ad Hoc Employees From Regularisation

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :