Bombay HC: National Security Justifies Denial of Police Clearance Certificate || Bombay HC: Comic Remarks Without Malicious Intent Not Religious Insult || J&K&L High Court: Scandalous Allegations Against Judicial Officers in Pleadings Impermissible || P&H HC: Writ Petition Against Private Trust's Contractual Employment Dismissed || Gujarat HC: Customary Divorce Entitles Daughter to Family Pension || Calcutta HC: ECI's Prerogative to Deploy Central Employees as Counting Supervisors Upheld || Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals || Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment || Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society || SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :