Supreme Court: Inclusion in Revised Select List Does Not Give TN MV Inspectors a Vested Right || Bombay HC: ICC Cannot Hear Sexual Harassment Complaint over Non-Employer Transport Incident || Ker HC Upholds Rule that Homeopathic Doctors Must Cancel Registration Before Enrolment as Advocates || J&K&L HC: Evidence Negating Penetration Warrants Conviction For Attempt to Rape, Not Rape || Karnataka High Court Rules on Daughter’s Coparcenary Rights in Grandfather’s Self-Acquired Property || Madhya Pradesh HC: Police Can be Prosecuted for Custodial Violence Without Prior Sanction || AP HP Criticized Authorities and Ordered Removal of an Ex-Serviceman’s Land From the Prohibited List || Kerala High Court Upheld the Conviction of a Madrasa Teacher in a Child Sexual Assault Case || Gauhati High Court: Pending Criminal Case Cannot Indefinitely Delay an MBBS Pass Certificate || SC Took Suo Motu Action and Directed Odisha to Aid a Visually Impaired Man and His Mother

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :