Supreme Court: Past Ad Hoc Service Counts for Pension, Not Seniority Against Direct Recruits || SC: CPC Amendment Allowed When New Facts and Reliefs Directly Relate to Existing Dispute || SC: Governing Law Clause Relevant to Determine Arbitral Seat When Two Venues Are Named || Supreme Court: Section 161 CrPC Statements Can Be Considered at Cognizance Stage, Not at Trial || Bombay High Court Directs Release of Protesters Held over Anti-ECI Agitations || Kerala High Court Orders State to Pay Rs. 21,000 Post-Surgery Assistance to Transgender Person || Madras High Court: DVAC Not Entitled to Blanket RTI Exemption in Corruption Cases || Karnataka High Court Strikes Down Enhanced SC/ST Quota for Breaching 50% Reservation Cap || Delhi HC: First-Come, First-Served Policy for Ramleela Ground Allotment is Unfair || Kerala HC Upholds Automatic Revocation of Christian Wills on Marriage under S.69 Succession Act

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :