Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petition against Chhattisgarh Tax Authorities || NCLAT Partially Upholds CCI’s Decision that Google Leveraged its Dominance in Play Store Ecosystem || SC: No Absolute Rule that When Investigation is at Nascent Stage, High Court Cannot Quash an Offence || Delhi HC: CESTAT’s Order Interdicting GST Dept. from Invoking Extended Period of Limitation Upheld || AP HC: Posting Matters to Longer Dates Defeats Purpose of Urgent Notice under O.39 R.1 CPC || Delhi HC: Initiation / Expansion of Live Streaming Must be Preceded by Adequate Preparation || MP HC: Centre to File Response Over Compliance of Public Awareness of POCSO Act in 2 Weeks || Rajasthan HC: Decision to Close Hostel Mess Due to Covid Won’t Amount to Abolition of Post || Allahabad HC: Conversion to Islam Bonafide if Individual Embraces by Own Freewill || Telangana HC: Cohabitation on Pretext of False Divorce from First Wife Amounts to Rape

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :