Supreme Court: Army Must Prove Disability Was Unrelated to Service to Deny Pension || SC: Grant of Fishing Rights by Deed is a Transfer of Immovable Property, Qualifies as Lease || Gujarat HC: Waqf Board Inquiry into Religious Character Not Barred by Places of Worship Act || Gauhati HC Rejects Failed Candidates’ Challenge to Law Officers’ Appointment Procedures || Kerala HC Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Woman Accused of Throwing Newborn, Cites Lack of Intent || P&H HC Quashes Case, Holds 'Heart Lung Pack' was not a Notified Drug in 2010 || Kerala HC: Illegal Arrest Entitles Accused to Release, Not Bail || Allahabad HC Explains: Does Conversion Automatically Strip a Person of Scheduled Tribe Status? || Delhi HC Rejects Vimal Elaichi Plea against FDA Notice to Shah Rukh Khan, Ajay Devgn, Tiger Shroff || Calcutta HC Upholds Jail Term for Owner Over Unauthorised Construction under Roof-Repair Permit

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :