Delhi High Court Passes Summary Judgment in Favour of Tata Power in Trademark Infringement Suit || MP High Court: District Magistrate Can Re-Execute Possession Orders u/s 14 of SARFAESI Act || Rajasthan HC: Accommodation to Female Candidates for Karwa Chauth isn’t Violation of Article 14 || SC Refers Regarding Compensation Under "No-Fault Liability" to Larger Bench || SC to Examine if the Period Prescribed under Section 18(5) of MSMED Act is Mandatory or Directory || SC: To Prevent Potential Environmental Damage PCBs Can Impose Compensatory Damages || SC: GUVNL Cannot be Guided by its Own Commercial Interests || Bombay High Court to Get New Bench at Kolhapur District || SC: Employers Must Accommodate Workers Who Acquire Disability || Supreme Court Quashes Bail Condition Forcing Conjugal Life With Wife

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :