SC: Exporters with Pending Applications Prior to Rule 96(10) Omission Entitled to IGST Refund || Bombay HC to Scrap Law College Intake Cuts if Mumbai University Follows Prescribed Timelines || Delhi HC Orders Removal of Derogatory Online Content Targeting Actress Tabu || Madras HC Orders Interim Elected Panel to Manage State Bar Council Affairs Until New Committee Forms || Patna HC: Whatsapp Messages Need Section 65B Certificate, Oral Evidence is Insufficient || Allahabad HC: Denying Maintenance That Forces Wife into Destitution Violates Art 21 Right to Dignity || Rajasthan HC Takes Suo Motu Notice of Structural Defects After IIT Bombay Warns Dome May Collapse || Bombay HC: 0.1 Mg Above Alcohol Limit is Insufficient to Warrant a Drunken Driving Trial || Supreme Court: Marking a Document as an Exhibit Does Not Prove its Contents || Supreme Court: Unpaid Consideration Alone Does Not Invalidate a Sale Deed

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :