Supreme Court Lays Down Principles Governing Joint Trials in Criminal Cases under CrPC and BNSS || Karnataka HC: Person Joining Festivals of Another Religion Does Not Violate Rights || Himachal Pradesh High Court: Recovery of Money without Proof of Demand Is Not Bribery || Kerala HC: Cognizance Of Rape u/s 376B IPC Needs Complaint by Separated Wife, Not on Police Report || J&K&L HC: Dealership & Lease Agreements Are Separate Contracts and Disputes Must Be Filed Separately || Calcutta High Court: Unemployment Does Not Excuse Able-Bodied Husband from Maintaining His Wife || Ker. HC: Violating the Procedure for Sampling Contraband u/s 53A of Abkari Act Vitiates Prosecution || Delhi High Court: Students with Less Than 75% Attendance Cannot Contest DU Student Union Elections || Delhi High Court: UGC Cannot Debar a University from PhD Admissions under UGC Act || Delhi High Court: MCD's Higher Property Tax on Luxury Hotels Not Arbitrary

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :