SC: Amendments to Government Orders Must Be Construed Fairly to Prevent Hardship || SC: Divorce Settlement Waiver Bars Revival of Monetary Claim under DV Act || Supreme Court: Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Where Ad Valorem Court Fee Depends on Disputed Facts || SC: Bail in Serious Offences like Murder Cases Must be Supported by Clear and Justifiable Reasons || Gauhati HC: Legal Heir Not Made Party Can Challenge Ex-Parte Succession Certificate || Allahabad HC: Hijab Not Essential Islamic Practice, Rejects Plea to Wear It With School Uniform || Gauhati HC: 24-Hour Limit for Magistrate Production Starts From Initial Detention under NDPS Act || Gujarat HC Orders Human Verification of AI-Generated Case Law in Tax Orders, Warns of Contempt || Madras HC: Pending Domestic Violence Case Alone Cannot Curtail Husband’s Right to Travel Abroad || Rajasthan HC: Son’s Coparcenary Claim Fails without Proof of Hindu Undivided Family

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :