Supreme Court: Drug Users are Victims and Focus Must Be on Breaking the Supply Chain || Supreme Court: Non-Signatories May Join Arbitration When the Dispute Affects Their Rights || Delhi HC: Homemaker’s Services Cannot Be Ignored in Compensation Due to Age || Kerala High Court Directs Photos and Videos of Illegal Vehicle Modifications in Accident Reports || Madras HC: Property Acquired by Catholic Priests Belongs to the Religious Society || Delhi HC: Pre-Marital Disability Cannot Be Used to Avoid Maintenance to Wife and Child || Allahabad HC: Religious Freedom Does Not Confer a Right to a Specific Plot for Cemetery || Allahabad HC: Dissatisfaction With Police Probe Alone Cannot Prove Wilful Neglect under SC/ST Act || Kerala HC: Teachers Cannot Face Criminal Action for Trivial Classroom Discipline Measures || Supreme Court: Past Ad Hoc Service Counts for Pension, Not Seniority Against Direct Recruits

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :