SC: Valid Bareboat Charter Termination Extinguishes Demise Charter, Vessel Arrest Vacated || SC: Absence of Train Ticket No Ground to Deny Compensation for Passenger’s Death || Patna HC: Routine FIR Involvement alone cannot Deny Arms Licence without Safety Threat || Chhattisgarh HC: WhatsApp Chats Proving Mental Cruelty cannot be Ignored on Evidence Grounds || Delhi HC: Foreign Travel Restrictions must not Obstruct Pregnant Foreigner's Medical Care || MP High Court: Article 227 Cannot Be Invoked to Quash Wife’s Conjugal Rights Proceedings || Kerala High Court Issues Directions on Driver Profiling, Bus Regulation and Road Safety || Delhi HC: Prior Permission for Foreign Travel Unjustified When Accused Was Never Arrested || Air India Penalised Rs. 50K Over De-boarding Disabled Woman and Wheelchair Damage || Delhi HC: Muslim Personal Law cannot Shield Sex with Minor Wife from POCSO Case

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :