Supreme Court Flags Excess Records as Cause of Delays in Corruption Case Prosecutions || Supreme Court: Outgoing Partner’s Share Valued on Assessment Date, Not Dissolution Date || Supreme Court Acquits Two Murder Convicts, Finds Prosecution Story Suspicious || SC Restores SEBI Fraud Proceedings against Vedanta over 2014 Share Buyback || CCI Rejects Kerala Private Bus Operators’ Challenge to Free KSRTC Travel for Women || Chhattisgarh HC: Sharia Body can't Decide Muslim Woman's Marital Status or End Marriage || MP High Court: Adult Woman Can Become Jain Saadhvi Despite Parents’ Opposition || MP High Court Quashes 70%-80%-90% Pay Rule for Class III, IV Staff during Probation || SC: Pre-2015 NH Act Awards Must Follow 1894 Act for Solatium and Interest || SC: Service Rendered Before Regularization Must Be Counted for Pension Benefits

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :