SC: Completed Trial can't be Remanded for Procedural Lapse Unless Prejudice is Proven || SC: Sessions Courts Cannot Bar Statutory Remission and Commutation Through Special Sentences || SC: Article 311 Bar Inapplicable If Removing Officer Equals Appointing Authority in Status || SC: Contractual Bar Prevents Arbitral Tribunal From Awarding Pre-Reference Interest || SC Frames Guidelines to Prevent POCSO Act Misuse by Parents in Custody Disputes || Delhi HC Directs DLSA to Convey Trial Court’s Encouraging Message and Compensation to POCSO Survivor || Delhi HC: Gravity of UAPA Offence Cannot Justify Prolonged PMLA Detention || Delhi HC Affirms Equestrian Federation's Youth Olympics Selection, Calls for Clearer Norms & Timeline || Delhi HC: Ajeet Bharti Used Caste Superiority to Humiliate Chandrashekhar Azad || Supreme Court: Anti-Suit Injunction Cannot Rest on Speculation of Unenforceable Foreign Decree

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :