Calcutta HC Rejects Reliance on ‘Vedic Mantras’, Commutes Death Sentence in Wife’s Murder Case || Tripura High Court Pulls Up State Over Failure to Implement Supreme Court's Open Prison Directions || Calcutta HC Upholds Life Term for Father who Raped Minor Daughter, Causing Pregnancy || Karnataka HC Directs Trial Courts, Police to Furnish S.164 of CrPC Statement Copies to Accused || P&H HC: Immigration Fraud by Consultancies is a Growing Menace, Denies Pre-Arrest Bail Leniency || CCPA Fines Rs. 1 Lakh Penalty on United Biscuits over Misleading ‘Wholewheat’ Claims || Bombay HC Permits OTT Release of Hindi Film ‘Bandar’ Subject to Appropriate Disclaimers || Gujarat HC Grants Bail to Marriage Bureau Owner, Finds No Link to Alleged ‘Looteri Dulhan’ Gang || Calcutta HC: Minor’s Consent has No Mitigating Effect in POCSO Sexual Assault Cases || Orissa HC Commutes Death Sentence, Says Emotion Cannot Override Established Law

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :