Gujarat HC Grants Bail to Marriage Bureau Owner, Finds No Link to Alleged ‘Looteri Dulhan’ Gang || Calcutta HC: Minor’s Consent has No Mitigating Effect in POCSO Sexual Assault Cases || Orissa HC Commutes Death Sentence, Says Emotion Cannot Override Established Law || Calcutta HC: Street Vendors Act Protects Lawful Vending, Not Illegal Encroachments || P&H HC: Courts Cannot Reveal Identities of Children in Conflict With Law in Court Records || Bombay HC: Government Cannot Fix ‘Politically Convenient’ Election Dates sets Goa Poll Timeline || SC: Major Port Trusts Liable for Customs Duty on Pilfered Goods under Customs Act || Supreme Court: General Fraud Allegations Cannot Extend Limitation under Section 74 CGST Act || SC: ‘No Coercive Steps’ Order Cannot Restrain Filing of Charge Sheet || Chhattisgarh HC: Maintenance for Autistic Child May Continue Beyond 18 Until Self-Sufficient

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :