MP High Court: Women Retain Reservation Benefits After Marriage if Caste is Recognized in Both States || Allahabad HC: Police Must Prosecute Informants of False Firs, and IOs May Face Contempt if They Fail || MP HP: Over-Age Candidate Cannot Claim Age Relaxation Due to Delay in Earlier Recruitment || Kerala HC: Petrol Pump Licence is Automatically Cancelled on Lease Expiry Without Any Hearing || MP HC: Trial Courts Cannot Grant Permanent Injunction in Title Suits Without Recovery of Possession || MP High Court: Guardians Can be Liable For Minors Flying Kites With Chinese Manjha || SC: Under Order XXI Rule 102 CPC, A Transferee Pendente Lite Cannot Obstruct Execution of a Decree || SC: RTE Act promotes fraternity and equality by children of judges and vendors studying together || MP High Court: Aadhaar and Voter ID Cards are Not Definitive Proof of Date of Birth || Chhattisgarh HC: Second Marriage During Subsisting First Marriage Void Unless Custom Permits It

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :