SC: Lessee Cannot Challenge Eviction After Landowner Withdraws Plea || SC: Appointment Contrary to Recruitment Advertisement Constitutes Fraud on Public || SC: Bribe Given to Intermediary Alone Insufficient to Establish Public Servant's Guilt under PC Act || SC: AO Cannot Revive Assessment Concluded by Settlement Commission under Income Tax Act || SC: Insurer's Office Location Alone can't Confer Jurisdiction for Claim under MV Act || Calcutta HC: Mutual Consent Divorce Justifies Quashing S.498A IPC Cruelty Case under HMA || Delhi HC: Mere 2-Year Delay in Arbitral Award does not Warrant Setting Aside || Kerala HC: Courts can't Insist on Identifying Unknown Parties in John Doe Suits || Supreme Court: Army Must Prove Disability Was Unrelated to Service to Deny Pension || SC: Grant of Fishing Rights by Deed is a Transfer of Immovable Property, Qualifies as Lease

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :