Madras High Court: No Appeal Lies Against E-Court Status or Adjournment Orders || Chhattisgarh HC: Judicial Officer Promotion Cannot be Denied on Complaint Without Disciplinary Action || Delhi High Court: January 1 as Deemed Service Date For Delhi and Andaman Civil and Police Officers || Delhi High Court: Private Media Houses Performing Public Functions are Subject to Writ Jurisdiction || Rajasthan High Court Orders Registration of Pets That May Pose a Threat to Human Life || Delhi High Court: NSE Qualifies as a Public Authority under the RTI Act || Bombay High Court: Sikh Exemption From Helmet Rule is a Reasonable Classification under Article 14 || Supreme Court: Advocate Cannot Enter a Compromise Without the Client’s Authorisation || Calcutta High Court: State Must Protect Every Accused From Mob Violence || Supreme Court: Gujarat Municipal Election Candidates Must Disclose Their Spouses’ Assets

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :