Supreme Court: IBC Mechanism Cannot Replace Decree Execution or Recovery Proceedings || SC Orders Closure of School Over Loan Default, Directs Police-Assisted Takeover under SARFAESI Act || MP HC: HC Lacks Jurisdiction to Appoint an Arbitrator in International Commercial Disputes || Allahabad HC Imposes Rs 15L Costs on Husband For Filing False Affidavits in Maintenance Proceedings || MP HC Directs ASI to Upload Bhojshala–Kamal Maula Survey Video on Secure Platform For Litigant || Bombay HC: Public Gathering Does Not Justify Handcuffing, Awarded ?50,000 Compensation || Madras HC: Woman’s Dignity Linked to Right to Shelter; Orders Restoration of Demolished Home || SC: Absence of Independent Witnesses is Not Fatal if Injured Eyewitness Testimony is Sterling || Supreme Court: Prosthetic Limb Costs Must Be Compensated To Restore Victims’ Dignity || Supreme Court: Probate Can be Revoked For Non-Impleadment of Parties and Suppression of Facts

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :