Allahabad High Court: Husband's Liability under the Domestic Violence Act Continues Despite Divorce || Bombay HC: Municipal Council Must Pay for Land Used as DP Road Despite Fund Shortage || Uttarakhand HC: Previous Service Pay Protection Does Not Confer Right to Career Progression Benefits || Supreme Court Revives POCSO Case Against Headmistress, Says Verifying Abuse Claims is No Excuse || SC: Voluminous Documents are No Excuse For Their Delayed Production under Commercial Courts Act || Supreme Court Orders Merged Bank's Eviction For Transferring Tenancy Without Landlord's Consent || SC: Oraon Tribe Custom Doesn't Allow Uncle-In-Law to Adopt Niece's Husband as Ghar Damad || Kerala HC Approves New Public Prosecutor Appointment Guidelines After a Minor Revision || Rajasthan HC Clarifies Criminal Writ Petitions Have No Separate Constitutional Status || Delhi HC Clarifies if Whatsapp Acknowledgment Can Make an Arbitral Award Binding

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :