SC: No Remand if the Appellate Court Can Decide the Issue on Existing Evidence || SC: S.69 Evidence Act Applies to Will Only if S.68 Attestation Proof is Impossible || SC: Superior’s Mere Reprimand Not Abetment of Suicide without Intent to Provoke Death || SC: Speedy Trial is Victim’s Right; Gangsters Act Case Cannot Stall Other Trials || Supreme Court Issues Directions to Curb Unaccounted Cash in Elections to Protect Democracy || Supreme Court Issues Directions to Prevent Fake Sureties in Bail Cases Involving Foreigners || Madras HC: Police Cannot Arbitrarily Bar Carrying Indian Flag at Peaceful Rallies || Delhi HC Bars JNU from Granting Student Admissions Using Deprivation Points || Kerala High Court Flags Misuse of POCSO in Marital Disputes and Acquits Man Accused of Rape || Calcutta HC orders Urgent EWS Certificate Decision, Says Mother's Voter Deletion Irrelevant

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :