Patna HC: Possessing Cough Syrup With under 2.5% Codeine Without Authorisation Attracts the NDPS Act || Madras HC: Person Who Converts to Islam Cannot Claim Backward Class Muslim Status || Madras High Court Lays Down Guidelines For Surrogacy Custody and Parentage Applications || Bombay High Court: Residence Proof is Mandatory For RTE Neighbourhood School Admissions || Madras HC Strikes Down TN Law Mandating Registrar’s Title Verification Before Property Registration || Bombay HC Allows Galli News to Report Medical Negligence But Bars Defamatory Hospital Imputations || Supreme Court: Parents’ Loss Cannot Be Measured With Arithmetical Precision || Supreme Court: Registered Sale Deed Remains Valid Despite Minor Attestation Discrepancies || Calcutta High Court: Section 107 BNSS Property Attachment Cannot be Used as a Recovery Tool || Ker HC: Elected Representatives Must Swear by God or Affirm, Cannot Invoke Specific Deities in Oath

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :