Supreme Court: State Must Be Impleaded When Relief is Sought From Public Exchequer || SC: Student Fees Cannot Be Increased Mid-Course Except in Exceptional Circumstances || Supreme Court: ED's Delay in Sending Arrest Order Does Not By Itself Invalidate Arrest || Supreme Court: Appeal Limitation Runs From NCLAT Order Pronouncement, Not Certified Copy Receipt || Gujarat High Court: Waqf Tribunal Has No Supervisory Authority Over Waqf Board || Kerala High Court Orders Aadhaar Fingerprint Comparison to Trace Sreekrishnapuram Murder Culprits || Delhi High Court: Unnatural Death at Police Station Alone Cannot Establish Police Negligence || Orissa High Court: Teacher Scolding Student for Intoxicant Use is Not Suicide Abetment || Supreme Court: Drug Users are Victims and Focus Must Be on Breaking the Supply Chain || Supreme Court: Non-Signatories May Join Arbitration When the Dispute Affects Their Rights

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :