Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal, Holds Investigating Officer Cannot Create Evidence || Supreme Court: NDPS Prosecution Cannot Be Quashed Solely Over Co-Accused’s Disclosure || SC: Tax Classification Depends on Goods' Form at Sale, not their End Use || Delhi High Court: No Material Showing Delhi Police Compromised the 2020 Riots Probe || Madras HC Suggests Mandatory Attachment of Properties Suspected to Be Proceeds of Corruption || P&H High Court: Demolition After Lawyer Flagged Corruption Appears Aimed at Silencing Him || Calcutta High Court: Contempt Proceedings Cannot Be Used to Challenge Orders or Attack Judges || Orissa High Court: Marriage Need Not Be Preserved When the Relationship Has Substantially Eroded || SC: CIRP Can Continue Despite Fraudulent Insolvency Plea That Triggered It || Delhi HC: Senior Citizen May Seek Eviction of Daughter-in-Law for Ill-Treatment

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :