Delhi High Court: Providing Email Services Does Not Make Google a Public Functionary || Patna HC: Lying on a Woman Without Any Act Toward Penetration Rules Out Attempted Rape || Delhi High Court: Litigants Cannot Claim a Bench Change as a Right After Roster Changes || Calcutta High Court: Peaceful Protest is a Democratic Right and Cannot Be Treated as an Offence || Delhi High Court: Trial Courts Must Verify an Accused’s Address Before Declaring Absconding || Gujarat High Court: Judicial Officer Cannot Seek HC Judge’s Transfer over Housing Grievance || Delhi High Court Orders 125 Websites Using Jio Trademark for Lottery and Gaming to Be Suspended || MP High Court Strikes Down 27% OBC Quota, Restores Reservation to 14% || Supreme Court: Hindu Widow’s Limited Estate Became Absolute under Succession Act || Supreme Court: Prima Facie Arbitration Agreement Requires Referral to Arbitration

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :