Supreme Court: General Fraud Allegations Cannot Extend Limitation under Section 74 CGST Act || SC: ‘No Coercive Steps’ Order Cannot Restrain Filing of Charge Sheet || Chhattisgarh HC: Maintenance for Autistic Child May Continue Beyond 18 Until Self-Sufficient || P&H HC: 45-Day Delay in Informing Detenue of Representation Right Violates Article 22(5) || Rajasthan HC Bars Courts from Protecting those Responsible for Building Defects at their Own Peril || Allahabad HC: Clarification Issued Before Decision Applies to Pending Tender Complaints || Allahabad HC: Father’s Custody Cannot be Denied without Proof of Guardianship Unfitness || Bombay High Court: Each Petitioner Must Pay Court Fee Where Causes of Action are Separate || P&H High Court: Counsel’s Ignorance of Readily Available Prior Litigation Amounts to Dereliction || SC: Amendments to Government Orders Must Be Construed Fairly to Prevent Hardship

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :