Delhi HC: Education Department Cannot Restrict Recruitment in Aided Minority Schools || Allahabad HC: Senior Citizens Act Cannot Decide Title Disputes Unless Transfer Challengeable || Bombay HC: Family Arrangement Execution Alone Not Proof of HUF Property Admission || Patna HC: BAU Statutes Cannot Convert 2011 Direct Recruitment into Tenure Appointment || P&H HC: Dressing Pet Dog as Lord Krishna Out of Devotion is Not Offence and Does Not Hurt Sentiments || J&K HC Quashes 2016 Case Against Coca-Cola Over in Dual Pricing MRPs Allegations || Supreme Court Explains the Grounds for Declaring a Judgment Per Incuriam || SC: Summoning Hotel Records, Phone Data to Prove Adultery Does Not Breach Privacy Rights || SC: Magistrates Should Not Record Prosecution Evidence in Sessions-Triable Cases || Supreme Court Lays Down Guidelines on Using ITRs to Assess Motor Accident Victims' Income

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :