Calcutta High Court: ECI Not Singling Out Bengal, More Transfers in Other Poll-Bound States || Delhi High Court: Driving Licence Not Fake Solely For Not Being Converted Into a Smart Card || Delhi High Court: Writ Petition Not Maintainable Before Final Order in Court Martial Proceedings || J&K High Court Grants Relief to Lawyers Accused of Assault at Srinagar District Court Premises || Delhi HC Imposes ?5 Lakh Fine on Rakshit Shetty For Unauthorised Song Use in Bachelor Party Film || Delhi High Court Grants Huawei Partial Relief in Ongoing Income Tax Proceedings || Delhi HC Upholds Bidder Disqualification in Sri Lanka Consular Services Tender For Lack of Experience || Kerala High Court Sets Aside Order Transferring School Playground, Citing Inadequate Consideration || Delhi High Court Directs Removal of Unauthorised Vendors, Declares Nehru Place a No-Vending Zone || Kerala High Court: SHO Cannot Order Surrender of Firearms over Phone Calls Before Elections

R. Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (18 Sep 2015)

Madras High Court denies anticipatory bail to Subhiksha promoter

MANU/TN/2944/2015

Criminal

The Court denied anticipatory bail to R. Subramanian, noting that it had already passed lenient orders in the past in efforts to enable some repayment to depositors of the 49 accused companies that the Petitioner was associated with. Dismissing the petition, the Court held that it was not sufficiently shown that giving Mr. Subramanian unfettered access to his office without fear of arrest would advance the cause of the depositors, given the documents already seized by prosecution.

Tags : ANTICIPATORY BAIL DEPOSITORS ACCESS

Share :