Supreme Court: Courts Have Sometimes Failed Arbitration, With Interference Curing No Disease || Supreme Court: Co-Heir Cannot Sell Other Heirs' Shares as Karta After Intestate Succession || SC: Casual Labourers With Temporary Status are Eligible For Pension Even Without Regularisation || Supreme Court: High Courts Must Record the Nature of Crime and Allegations While Quashing FIRs || Delhi HC Rejected Pernod Ricard’s Plea Against Denial of Wholesale Liquor License over Excise Case || Gujarat HC: Lalita Kumari Ruling Does Not Permit Deceased’s Kin to Invoke Art 226 For FIR Failure || Ker HC: Denying Disability Pension to Army Personnel Based on Unreasoned Medical Opinion is Invalid || Kerala HC Directs Family Courts to Follow Calcutta HC Custody Guidelines Till State Rules Framed || Allahabad HC Allows LIC Employees to Be Engaged as Census Enumerators and Supervisors For Duties || Supreme Court Unveiled Victim Protection Plan For Trafficking Survivors and Urged Legal Reforms

Rupa Marya et al v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. et al - (22 Sep 2015)

Warner Music does not own rights to ‘Happy Birthday’ lyrics

MANU/USDC/0001/2015

Intellectual Property Rights

A United States District Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion that the Defendants did not receive copyright to the lyrics of the well-known song ‘Happy Birthday To You’. The Court held that the original authors of the song, Patty Hill, Mildred J. Hill and Jessica Hill, did not try to obtain federal copyright protection nor did they take action to prevent use of the lyrics by others, even in the song’s commercial success. It was only in 1934 that they asserted their rights to the melody contained in the song, but still not to the lyrics. The Defendants having failed to prove their ownership of the right to the lyrics of the song, only enjoyed copyright in the melody and piano arrangements in the song.

Tags : COPYRIGHT SONG HAPPY BIRTHDAY LYRICS

Share :