SC: Section 22 of Hindu Succession Act Preference For Class-I Heirs Applies to Agricultural Land || Supreme Court: Refund Clause in Sale Agreement Does Not Extinguish Right to Specific Performance || SC Clarifies When a Probate Application Filed After a Testator's Death is Time-Barred || Madras HC: Coordinate Bench Cannot Reopen Issue Already Settled by Another Division Bench || Delhi HC Urges Law to Regulate Media, Notes Anyone with a Mobile Phone Can Claim to be a Journalist || CCI Rejects Allegations of Collusion Involving Reliance Jio and More Than 4,500 Entities || Allahabad HC: Working Mother with Child Custody Cannot Shift Entire Maintenance Liability to Father || Bombay HC: Possessory Suit U/S 6 of the SRA is Maintainable Despite a Licensor-Licensee Relationship || Del HC: Master's Candidates Without the Prescribed Bachelor's Degree are Ineligible as Govt Teacher || Cal HC: BSF Cannot Deny DIG Rank to an Officer Injured in 1995 Road Accident After Earlier Promotion

Rupa Marya et al v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. et al - (22 Sep 2015)

Warner Music does not own rights to ‘Happy Birthday’ lyrics

MANU/USDC/0001/2015

Intellectual Property Rights

A United States District Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion that the Defendants did not receive copyright to the lyrics of the well-known song ‘Happy Birthday To You’. The Court held that the original authors of the song, Patty Hill, Mildred J. Hill and Jessica Hill, did not try to obtain federal copyright protection nor did they take action to prevent use of the lyrics by others, even in the song’s commercial success. It was only in 1934 that they asserted their rights to the melody contained in the song, but still not to the lyrics. The Defendants having failed to prove their ownership of the right to the lyrics of the song, only enjoyed copyright in the melody and piano arrangements in the song.

Tags : COPYRIGHT SONG HAPPY BIRTHDAY LYRICS

Share :