Calcutta HC Confirms KMC Can Revise Property Valuation to Levy Tax In ?11.24 Crore Dispute || Bom HC Cancels Bail of Accused Supplying Fake Medicines, Says it Weakens Public Trust in Healthcare || MP HC: Oral, Anal Sex Between Married Couples Not Punishable under Section 377 IPC || SC Says Respect For Higher Court Orders a Basic Principle, Rebukes Authority For Revisiting Order || SC: Merits of Foreign Arbitral Awards Cannot be Re-Examined During Enforcement Proceedings || SC: Failure to Sign Charge Sheet Doesn’t Invalidate Trial if Charges Were Properly Read to Accused || Delhi HC: Bipolar Disorder Alone Does Not Qualify as Medical Disability Without Benchmark Criteria || Kerala HC: Excommunicating Knanaya Catholics For Marrying Outside the Community is Unconstitutional || Kerala HC: Temporary Use of Religious Land For Public Infrastructure is Not a ‘Transfer’ under Law || P&H HC: Habeas Plea in Child Custody Case Not Maintainable if Child is With Natural Guardian and Safe

Rupa Marya et al v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. et al - (22 Sep 2015)

Warner Music does not own rights to ‘Happy Birthday’ lyrics

MANU/USDC/0001/2015

Intellectual Property Rights

A United States District Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion that the Defendants did not receive copyright to the lyrics of the well-known song ‘Happy Birthday To You’. The Court held that the original authors of the song, Patty Hill, Mildred J. Hill and Jessica Hill, did not try to obtain federal copyright protection nor did they take action to prevent use of the lyrics by others, even in the song’s commercial success. It was only in 1934 that they asserted their rights to the melody contained in the song, but still not to the lyrics. The Defendants having failed to prove their ownership of the right to the lyrics of the song, only enjoyed copyright in the melody and piano arrangements in the song.

Tags : COPYRIGHT SONG HAPPY BIRTHDAY LYRICS

Share :