Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals || Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment || Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society || SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers || J&K&L High Court: Minor Minerals Have Major Environmental Impacts and Must be Regulated || Del HC: Unexplained Money Received by Public Servant is Not Bribery Without Proof of Official Favour || Del HC: There is No Absolute Bar on Granting Co-Convicts Parole/Furlough Together in Suitable Cases || Bom HC: LARR Authority Can Examine Limitation Issues in Land Acquisition References under 2013 Act || MP HC: Long-Serving Employees Cannot Be Denied Regularisation by Retrospective Statutory Amendments || J&K&L HC: Routine Challenges to Lok Adalat Awards Defeat Their Purpose of Quick Dispute Resolution

Rupa Marya et al v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. et al - (22 Sep 2015)

Warner Music does not own rights to ‘Happy Birthday’ lyrics

MANU/USDC/0001/2015

Intellectual Property Rights

A United States District Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion that the Defendants did not receive copyright to the lyrics of the well-known song ‘Happy Birthday To You’. The Court held that the original authors of the song, Patty Hill, Mildred J. Hill and Jessica Hill, did not try to obtain federal copyright protection nor did they take action to prevent use of the lyrics by others, even in the song’s commercial success. It was only in 1934 that they asserted their rights to the melody contained in the song, but still not to the lyrics. The Defendants having failed to prove their ownership of the right to the lyrics of the song, only enjoyed copyright in the melody and piano arrangements in the song.

Tags : COPYRIGHT SONG HAPPY BIRTHDAY LYRICS

Share :