SC: General Reference to a Tender’s Arbitration Clause Does Not Incorporate it into a Contract || Supreme Court: Partnership Veil May be Lifted to Detect Illegal Sub-Letting Arrangements || Supreme Court: Lower Dearness Relief For Pensioners than Employees' DA is Arbitrary under Article 14 || Supreme Court: NCLT Should Not Assess Merits of Pre-Existing Dispute in Section 9 Applications || Supreme Court Clarifies that the Right to Vote is Not a Fundamental Right But a Statutory Right || Chhattisgarh High Court: Minor’s Voluntary Elopement With a Lover Does Not Constitute Kidnapping || Bombay HC: Staring at Co-Worker’s Chest is Morally Wrong But Does Not Amount to Voyeurism under IPC || Delhi HC: Loss of Confidence in Employees Entrusted With Funds is Valid Ground For Termination || Allahabad High Court: Gram Nyayalaya Has Jurisdiction to Decide Maintenance and Execution Petitions || J&K&L HC: Non-Publication of Sec 4(1) Notice in Gazette and Local Newspapers Vitiates Acquisition

Rupa Marya et al v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. et al - (22 Sep 2015)

Warner Music does not own rights to ‘Happy Birthday’ lyrics

MANU/USDC/0001/2015

Intellectual Property Rights

A United States District Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion that the Defendants did not receive copyright to the lyrics of the well-known song ‘Happy Birthday To You’. The Court held that the original authors of the song, Patty Hill, Mildred J. Hill and Jessica Hill, did not try to obtain federal copyright protection nor did they take action to prevent use of the lyrics by others, even in the song’s commercial success. It was only in 1934 that they asserted their rights to the melody contained in the song, but still not to the lyrics. The Defendants having failed to prove their ownership of the right to the lyrics of the song, only enjoyed copyright in the melody and piano arrangements in the song.

Tags : COPYRIGHT SONG HAPPY BIRTHDAY LYRICS

Share :