Supreme Court: Vacancies From Resignations under CUSAT Act Must Follow Communal Rotation || Supreme Court: Forest Land Cannot Be Leased or Used For Agriculture Without Centre’s Approval || Supreme Court: Gravity of Offence and Accused’s Role Must Guide Suspension of Sentence under CrPC || Supreme Court: Arbitral Awards Cannot be Set Aside For Mere Legal Errors or Misreading of Evidence || SC Acknowledges Child Trafficking as a Grave Reality and Issues Guidelines to Assess Victim Evidence || Allahabad HC: When Parties Extend an Agreement by Conduct, The Arbitration Clause Extends Too || Supreme Court: Issues of Party Capacity and Maintainability Must Be Decided by Arbitral Tribunal || Supreme Court: Omissions in Chief Examination Can Be Rectified During Cross-Examination || Supreme Court: Items Given by Accused to Police Are Not Section 27 Recoveries under Evidence Act || Gujarat High Court: Waqf Institutions Must Pay Court Fees When Filing Disputes in State Tribunal

Rupa Marya et al v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. et al - (22 Sep 2015)

Warner Music does not own rights to ‘Happy Birthday’ lyrics

MANU/USDC/0001/2015

Intellectual Property Rights

A United States District Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion that the Defendants did not receive copyright to the lyrics of the well-known song ‘Happy Birthday To You’. The Court held that the original authors of the song, Patty Hill, Mildred J. Hill and Jessica Hill, did not try to obtain federal copyright protection nor did they take action to prevent use of the lyrics by others, even in the song’s commercial success. It was only in 1934 that they asserted their rights to the melody contained in the song, but still not to the lyrics. The Defendants having failed to prove their ownership of the right to the lyrics of the song, only enjoyed copyright in the melody and piano arrangements in the song.

Tags : COPYRIGHT SONG HAPPY BIRTHDAY LYRICS

Share :