Bom HC: Civil Court Can Invoke Sec 151 CPC to Dismiss a Suit as Infructuous if Cause of Action Ends || Kerala HC: Arrest Grounds Need Not Be Shared With Foreigner’s Family If FRRO Or Embassy is Informed || Delhi HC Granted Interim Relief to JioStar in a Dispute over Legends League Cricket Broadcast Rights || SC: Dishonour of a Post-Dated Cheque Alone Does Not Establish Dishonest Intent For Cheating || SC: Disciplinary Proceedings Started During Service May Continue After Retirement If Rules Allow || Supreme Court: Earning Interest on a Bank Deposit Does Not Make it a Commercial Purpose || CCI Dismisses Complaint Against Rapido over Use of Private Vehicles in Bike Taxi Service || Allahabad HC: State Must Protect Individuals Threatened for Conducting Prayers in Private Spaces || Madras HC: Habeas Corpus Petition Cannot Be Used if Wife Voluntarily Elopes with Another Man || Calcutta High Court: Post-VRS Service Benefits Cannot be Denied; Ex-Employees Entitled to Arrears

Rupa Marya et al v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. et al - (22 Sep 2015)

Warner Music does not own rights to ‘Happy Birthday’ lyrics

MANU/USDC/0001/2015

Intellectual Property Rights

A United States District Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion that the Defendants did not receive copyright to the lyrics of the well-known song ‘Happy Birthday To You’. The Court held that the original authors of the song, Patty Hill, Mildred J. Hill and Jessica Hill, did not try to obtain federal copyright protection nor did they take action to prevent use of the lyrics by others, even in the song’s commercial success. It was only in 1934 that they asserted their rights to the melody contained in the song, but still not to the lyrics. The Defendants having failed to prove their ownership of the right to the lyrics of the song, only enjoyed copyright in the melody and piano arrangements in the song.

Tags : COPYRIGHT SONG HAPPY BIRTHDAY LYRICS

Share :