NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App.  ||  Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement  ||  Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles  ||  Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025"  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark  ||  Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity  ||  Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks  ||  HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity  ||  Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void  ||  Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it    

Jaquar & Co. Ltd. v Commissioner of Service Tax - (Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal) (30 Oct 2014)

Commissioner, Service Tax cannot delve into correctness of Cenvat

MANU/CE/0798/2014

Excise

On a perusal of sample debit notes, the nature of the service clarified by the Service Tax registration number, the Tribunal found in favour of the Appellant that service was a Business Auxiliary Service. It added, that once Service Tax paid by the service provider was accepted by the Central Excise authorities, as Service Tax on "Business Auxiliary" service, the Central Excise authority could not seek review of that assessment of the service at the time of considering its Cenvat credit.

Relevant : Pharmalab Process Equipments Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commr. of C. Ex. MANU/CS/0183/2009 Commissioner of C. Ex., Indore vs. Gwalior Chemicals Industries Ltd. MANU/CE/0329/2011 Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore vs. Grasim Industries Ltd. MANU/CE/0406/2011

Tags : BUSINESS AUXILIARY SERVICE   CENVAT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved