SC: Confirmation of an Auction Sale Does Not Bar Judicial Scrutiny of Reserve Price Valuation  ||  Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction of Four Men in a 1998 Gang Rape Case  ||  Supreme Court: Privy Purse Privileges of Princely Rulers are Not Enforceable Legal Rights  ||  Delhi HC: Repeated Court Summons May Distress and Re-Traumatize Child Sexual Assault Victims  ||  Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Labeling Someone as a Terrorist Associate Amounts to Defamation  ||  Delhi HC: Setting Aside or Altering a Judge’s Order by a Higher Court Doesn’t Affect Their Integrity  ||  Delhi High Court: Accused Cannot be Faulted For Smart Replies; Interrogator Must be Sharper  ||  Supreme Court: Belated Jurisdictional Challenge Impermissible After Participation in Arbitration  ||  Supreme Court: Failure to Prove Specific Overt Acts of Each Unlawful Assembly Member Not Fatal  ||  Supreme Court: Parental Salary Alone Cannot Determine OBC Creamy Layer Status    

Jaquar & Co. Ltd. v Commissioner of Service Tax - (Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal) (30 Oct 2014)

Commissioner, Service Tax cannot delve into correctness of Cenvat

MANU/CE/0798/2014

Excise

On a perusal of sample debit notes, the nature of the service clarified by the Service Tax registration number, the Tribunal found in favour of the Appellant that service was a Business Auxiliary Service. It added, that once Service Tax paid by the service provider was accepted by the Central Excise authorities, as Service Tax on "Business Auxiliary" service, the Central Excise authority could not seek review of that assessment of the service at the time of considering its Cenvat credit.

Relevant : Pharmalab Process Equipments Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commr. of C. Ex. MANU/CS/0183/2009 Commissioner of C. Ex., Indore vs. Gwalior Chemicals Industries Ltd. MANU/CE/0329/2011 Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore vs. Grasim Industries Ltd. MANU/CE/0406/2011

Tags : BUSINESS AUXILIARY SERVICE   CENVAT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved