Kerala HC: Persons With Down Syndrome Get Protection and Guardianship under National Trust Act, 1999  ||  J&K&L HC: Contractual Staff Cannot Claim Payment Beyond Contract Period Without Proving Work  ||  J&K&L HC: Revisional Powers U/S 15 Must be Exercised in Reasonable Time, Not After 20-Year Delay  ||  MP High Court: Revoking Building Permission Without Fraud Proof Violates Right to Property  ||  Madras HC: Centre’s Consent For Remission is Needed only When Sentence under Central Act is Ongoing  ||  Delhi HC: Private School Employees Entitled to Child Care Leave Equivalent to Government Employees  ||  Supreme Court Has Released Draft Regulations on AI Use in the Judiciary and Invited Public Feedback  ||  Supreme Court: MMDR Act Royalty Hikes Prevail over Contractual Terms  ||  Delhi HC: Daughter-In-Law Has No Independent Right in Mother-In-Law’s Self-Acquired House  ||  SC: Prolonged Separation Can Constitute Cruelty and Desertion    

Jaquar & Co. Ltd. v Commissioner of Service Tax - (Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal) (30 Oct 2014)

Commissioner, Service Tax cannot delve into correctness of Cenvat

MANU/CE/0798/2014

Excise

On a perusal of sample debit notes, the nature of the service clarified by the Service Tax registration number, the Tribunal found in favour of the Appellant that service was a Business Auxiliary Service. It added, that once Service Tax paid by the service provider was accepted by the Central Excise authorities, as Service Tax on "Business Auxiliary" service, the Central Excise authority could not seek review of that assessment of the service at the time of considering its Cenvat credit.

Relevant : Pharmalab Process Equipments Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commr. of C. Ex. MANU/CS/0183/2009 Commissioner of C. Ex., Indore vs. Gwalior Chemicals Industries Ltd. MANU/CE/0329/2011 Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore vs. Grasim Industries Ltd. MANU/CE/0406/2011

Tags : BUSINESS AUXILIARY SERVICE   CENVAT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved