Supreme Court: Anti-Suit Injunction Cannot Rest on Speculation of Unenforceable Foreign Decree  ||  SC: High Court’s Location doesn't Become Arbitration Seat Merely by Appointing Arbitrator  ||  SC Disapproves PIL Challenging Inter-Se Evaluation of Tender Bids  ||  Delhi HC: Bail Grant or Cancellation Cannot Depend on Monetary Settlement With Complainant  ||  Kerala HC Directs Bar Council to Publish List of Advocates Practising Without AIBE Clearance, CoP  ||  Rajasthan HC: Candidate Cannot Blame E-Mitra for Failing to Correct Caste Category Within Deadline  ||  Patna HC: Mere FIR Registration cannot Justify Cancellation of PDS Licence  ||  Calcutta HC: NEET Medical Board Cannot Reassess Disability Percentage of PwBD Candidates  ||  Madras HC: MLAs Cannot Challenge Assembly Vote Later if They Raised No Objection During Voting  ||  Karnataka HC Upholds DRDO Land Acquisition, Citing Primacy of National Security    

Bombay HC: HC Cannot Entertain an Appeal wherein ‘Rate of Duty’ or ‘Value of Goods’ is Disputed - (24 Jul 2017)

Bombay High Court has observed that in view of Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944, High Court has no jurisdiction to entertain appeals wherein the “rate of duty” or “value of goods” is the subject matter.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   EXCISE ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved