Supreme Court: Belated Jurisdictional Challenge Impermissible After Participation in Arbitration  ||  Supreme Court: Failure to Prove Specific Overt Acts of Each Unlawful Assembly Member Not Fatal  ||  Supreme Court: Parental Salary Alone Cannot Determine OBC Creamy Layer Status  ||  SC: Direct Recruits’ Seniority Begins From Initial Appointment, Not Completion of Probation  ||  Supreme Court: Police Recruitment Can be Denied Only if Acquittal in Heinous Crime Was on Doubt  ||  J&K & Ladakh High Court: Section 479 BNSS Does Not Grant Automatic Bail After Detention Period  ||  Bombay High Court: Trial Vitiated if Forensic Experts Whose Reports are Relied Upon are Not Examined  ||  J&K & Ladakh HC: Mutation Attested in Violation of Agrarian Reforms Act Can be Reviewed in Revision  ||  Gujarat High Court: Power Company Cannot Allege Deceased’s Negligence in Hanging Live Wire Death  ||  Delhi High Court Denies Lifting Stay on Kent RO’s Sale of Fans under the KENT Trademark    

Police Commissioner vs. Lakhani Piraji Vanjara - (Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal) (15 Feb 2024)

Security service provided by the police department to various agencies and consideration received by them is not liable to service tax under security agency service

MANU/CS/0073/2024

Service Tax

The issue involved is that the service of security escort/ detecting agency provided by the Police Commissioner, Surat and consideration received their against is liable to service tax or otherwise. Against the common order, assessee the police Commissioner filed Appeal contesting the demand of service tax.

The assessee submits that the issue of levy of service tax on the police department for various service such as escort service, detecting agency service provided to various agencies and consideration received here against is not liable to service tax.

The issue is no longer res-integra as in the various judgments including the judgments cited by the assessee, it is categorically held that security service provided by the police department to various agencies and consideration their against received by them is not liable to service tax under security agency service. Therefore, the issue is no longer res-integra. Therefore, the demand is set aside, consequently no penalty can be imposed as sought in the Revenue's appeal. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside. Appeal of Assessee is allowed and appeal of revenue is dismissed.

Tags : DEMAND   CONFIRMATION   LEGALITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved