SC: Magistrates Should Not Record Prosecution Evidence in Sessions-Triable Cases  ||  Supreme Court Lays Down Guidelines on Using ITRs to Assess Motor Accident Victims' Income  ||  Supreme Court: Citing AI-Generated Fake Precedents Amounts to Advocate Misconduct  ||  Bombay HC: Horse-Trading Rampant in Maharashtra, FIRs 'Washed' After Switching Sides  ||  Tripura High Court: Senior Citizens Cannot be Penalised For Failing to Follow Cases Online  ||  Delhi High Court: Parent Cannot Gain Advantage by Keeping a Child Against a Foreign Court Order  ||  Allahabad HC: Places of Worship Act Bars Conversion of Religious Character, Not State Acquisition  ||  Jharkhand HC: Single Instance of Mother-In-Law Abusing Daughter-In-Law Does Not Amount to Cruelty  ||  Madras High Court: No Appeal Lies Against E-Court Status or Adjournment Orders  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Judicial Officer Promotion Cannot be Denied on Complaint Without Disciplinary Action    

Jeevan Kalyana Sadhan vs. ITO - (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) (02 Mar 2023)

Audit report can be filed even at the appellate stage

MANU/IF/0031/2023

Direct Taxation

The assessee is a trust, which had filed its return of income for the relevant assessment year year. However, when the return of income was filed, the auditors of the assessee had failed to include the Form 10B being the audit report alongwith return of income. It was the submission that, the due date for filing the audit report was 30.9.2015 and the mistake in filing of the audit report was noticed and same was rectified on 21.11.2019. It was the submission that on appeal, the learned CIT(A) had dismissed the assessee's appeal on the ground that ignorance of law is not an excuse. It was the submission that the assessee is dependent on its Chartered Accountant and Auditors for filing the return. The mistake done by the auditors should not put the assessee on a disadvantage position as long as the assessee has not been found to be perse at fault.

A perusal of the decision of the High Court in the case of CIT vs. Shahzedanand Charity Trust clearly shows that the Hon'ble P&H High Court has categorically held that the audit report under Section 12A(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be filed even at the appellate stage. Thus, High Court has held that the filing of the audit report alongwith the return as per provisions of section 12A(1)(b) of the Act is not mandatory.

The audit has been done within time in the case of the assessee and it is only the audit report which has not been filed within the time prescribed. This is only a venial breach of the provisions. The assessee should not be denied the benefit of deduction under Section 11 and 12 of the Act on account of the said venial breach in respect of the delay in filing of the audit report. Consequently, the delay in filing of the audit report in Form 10B is condoned and the Assessing Officer is directed to consider the same when computing the income of the assessee. Appeal of the assessee stands allowed.

Tags : AUDIT REPORT   ASSESSMENT   RETURN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved