Supreme Court Awards Rs. 6 Lakh to Man Acquitted After 6 Years, Faults UP Police Probe  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Can Restore Power on 50% Deposit in Arbitrary Theft Assessments  ||  Supreme Court: Cooperative Society Cannot Deny RTI Records as Personal if Registrar Can Access Them  ||  SC: CoC Cannot Withdraw Approved Resolution Plan Over Improved Corporate Debtor Finances  ||  Delhi High Court: 24-Week Limit Alone Cannot Restrict Medical Termination of Pregnancy  ||  Allahabad High Court Rejects Challenge to 18% GST on Online Legal Database Services  ||  Madras High Court: FIR Registration Does Not Decide Guilt; Prior Hearing of Accused Not Required  ||  Kerala High Court Orders Speedy Prosecution Sanction Process in Sabarimala Gold Theft Case  ||  Allahabad HC: Missing RT-PCR Report Cannot Bar COVID-19 Compensation if Records Confirm Infection  ||  MP High Court Directs Indore Police to Deploy Volunteers for Reporting Noise Pollution Violations    

The Member of the Executive Council, Education, North West Province vs. Izak Boshoff Foster & Others - (13 Feb 2023)

State is liable for any delictual or contractual damage or loss caused as a result of any act or omission in connection with any school activity conducted by a public school

Civil

The Appellant, the MEC of Education, North West, was found liable in terms of Section 60 of the South African Schools Act, 1998 for damages suffered by the first Respondent as a result of the negligence and incompetence of a third party (first aid personnel) appointed by Hoer Volkskool Potchefstroom (Volkskool) to administer emergency medical service at a rugby tournament taking place at Volkskool premises. The central issue for determination is whether the MEC was liable for the second injury that, the first respondent suffered on 6 May 2010 at the rugby match held at Volkskoo. The High Court held the MEC liable for the totality of damages suffered by the first respondent as well as all costs associated with the action on a punitive scale.

The high court correctly applied its mind when it held the MEC liable for damages that the first respondent suffered based on the unrefuted expert medical evidence. The expert medical evidence supported the conclusion that his damages were caused by the manner in which he was carried off the field by the first aid personnel and the consequences which flowed therefrom. Volkskool failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that the first aid personnel it employed were competent, properly equipped and available to deal with the clearly foreseeable possibility of serious injuries and their consequences which are inherent to the sport of rugby. The MEC was liable for the wrongful conduct of the school because rugby was found to be an activity connected to an educational activity as defined in Section 60 of the Act.

State is liable for any delictual or contractual damage or loss caused as a result of any act or omission in connection with any school activity conducted by a public school. Section 60 brought about a legal duty to avoid delictual harm based on the principle of in loco parentis, in which the school or an educator assumes the role of a parent, when learners are under their care and custody during sport and school activities. The MEC was liable for the damages the first respondent had suffered.

Tags : DAMAGES   LIABILITY   PROVISION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved