NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

Matrimony.com Limited. vs. The ACIT / DCIT / ITO - (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) (20 Apr 2022)

TDS not liable to be deducted on Advertisement Expenses paid to Online Platforms

MANU/IX/0274/2022

Direct Taxation

The assessee company is engaged in the business of providing services in connection with marriage alliance and related services. The company markets its product both through online and offline advertisements. During the relevant financial year, the company has availed the services of Facebook, Ireland Ltd., for advertisement in order to promote the business of matrimony and incurred advertisement cost. The AO during the course of assessment proceedings, on examination of financials noted that the assessee has not deducted TDS towards advertisement charges paid to Facebook, Ireland Ltd., according to the provisions of Section 195I of Income Tax Act, 1961 and hence, applying the provisions of section 40(a)(i) of the Act, disallowed the advertisement charges paid to Facebook.

Being Aggrieved, assessee preferred appeal before CIT(A). The CIT(A) relying on the case law of Google India Pvt. Ltd., of ITAT, Bangalore confirmed the disallowance. Aggrieved, now assessee is in second appeal before the Tribunal.

The Court observed that ITAT, Bangalore in the case of Urban Ladder Home Décor Solutions Pvt. Ltd., considered the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd., vs. CIT wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court exactly on same facts held that there is no requirement to deduct tax at source from the advertisement payments made for using the information technology facility u/s.195 of the Act. Thus, as the facts of the present case are exactly same with the one of Urban Ladder, the advertisement charges liable to be allowed as deduction.

Tags : ADVERTISEMENT CHARGES   TDS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved