Calcutta HC Confirms KMC Can Revise Property Valuation to Levy Tax In ?11.24 Crore Dispute  ||  Bom HC Cancels Bail of Accused Supplying Fake Medicines, Says it Weakens Public Trust in Healthcare  ||  MP HC: Oral, Anal Sex Between Married Couples Not Punishable under Section 377 IPC  ||  SC Says Respect For Higher Court Orders a Basic Principle, Rebukes Authority For Revisiting Order  ||  SC: Merits of Foreign Arbitral Awards Cannot be Re-Examined During Enforcement Proceedings  ||  SC: Failure to Sign Charge Sheet Doesn’t Invalidate Trial if Charges Were Properly Read to Accused  ||  Delhi HC: Bipolar Disorder Alone Does Not Qualify as Medical Disability Without Benchmark Criteria  ||  Kerala HC: Excommunicating Knanaya Catholics For Marrying Outside the Community is Unconstitutional  ||  Kerala HC: Temporary Use of Religious Land For Public Infrastructure is Not a ‘Transfer’ under Law  ||  P&H HC: Habeas Plea in Child Custody Case Not Maintainable if Child is With Natural Guardian and Safe    

Myntra Designs Pvt. Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation), Circle-1(2) - (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) (03 Sep 2021)

Payments made by the non-resident company, cannot be considered as "royalty payments" and do not give rise any income chargeable in India under Indian IT Act

MANU/IL/0304/2021

Direct Taxation

The Assessee herein is an Indian company. The AO noticed that the Assessee has made payments to M/s Face Ireland Ltd towards advertisement charges. The AO held that, said payments are taxable in India primarily as 'royalty' and alternatively as FTS/FIS. Accordingly, the AO raised demand under Section 201(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act) @ 20% of the payments and also charged interest under Section 201(1A) of the Act in all the three years.

Learned CIT(A) has confirmed the demand raised by the AO under Section 201(1)/201(1A) of IT Act treating the Assessee as an 'assessee in default' for non-deduction of tax at source from the payments made to M/s Facebook Ireland towards advertisement fees.

The facts prevailing in the instant cases are identical with the facts of Urban Ladder Home Décor Solutions Pvt. Ltd. with regard to the payments made to Facebook, Ireland towards advertisement charges. Accordingly, in view of said decision, present Tribunal held that, the payments made by the Assessee the non-resident company Facebook, Ireland cannot be considered as "royalty payments" and hence they do not give rise any income chargeable in India under Indian Income tax Act in all the three years under consideration.

In that view of the matter, there is no requirement to deduct tax at source from those payments under Section 195 of the Act. Hence the Assessee cannot be considered as an Assessee in default under Section 201(1) of the IT Act. Accordingly, the orders passed by CIT(A) for the years under consideration are set aside and the AO is directed to delete the demand raised under Section 201(1) of the IT Act and also the consequential interest charged under Section 201(1A) of the IT Act in all the three years under consideration. Appeals of the Assessee are allowed.

Tags : ASSESSMENT   DEDUCTION   LEGALITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved