Kerala HC: Revisional Power U/S 263 Not Invocable When AO Grants Sec 32AC Deduction After Inquiry  ||  J&K&L HC: Section 359 BNSS Doesn’t Limit High Court’s Inherent Power U/S 528 to Quash FIRs  ||  Bombay HC: BMC Ban on Footpath Cooking via Gas/Grill Doesn’t Apply to Vendors Using Induction  ||  Madras HC: Buyer Not Liable for Seller’s Tax Default; Purchase Tax Can’t Be Imposed under TNGST Act  ||  Kerala HC: Oral Allegations Alone Insufficient to Sustain Bribery Charges Against Ministers  ||  Delhi HC: CCI Cannot Levy Interest Retrospectively Before Valid Service of Demand Notice  ||  Delhi HC: VC Rules Don’t Shield PMLA Accused From Physically Appearing Before ED in Probe  ||  SC: If Complaint Reveals Cognizable Offence, Magistrate May Order FIR Registration U/S .156(3) CrPC  ||  SC: Private Buses Can’t Operate on Inter-State Routes Overlapping Notified State Transport Routes  ||  Delhi HC: Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Provisional Attachment When PMLA Remedy Exists    

Anwar Sultana Educational Trust Vs. CIT (E), Chandigarh - (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) (16 Aug 2021)

Exemption under Section 11 of IT Act can be availed by institutions which are genuinely engaged in 'charitable activities’

MANU/IS/0009/2021

Direct Taxation

Present appeal of the assessee society is directed against the order passed by the CIT(E), Chandigarh whereby he rejected the application filed for registration under Section 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act). The appellant society has been in operation since 28th May, 2016 and filed an application in the office of CIT(E) on 1st February, 2017 for seeking registration under Section 12AA of the IT Act.

It is admitted fact that the main Object of the applicant trust are to impart education among the society without any caste, creed and Colour. The trust deed submitted before the Learned CIT was quite explanatory of the fact that, the trust was created for imparting education.

Learned CIT(E), while passing impugned order seems to be under hurry in passing ex parte order in 2nd round and further to understand the definition of 'charitable activities' de hors requirement of law would only enable an institution to be granted registration under section 12AA of the IT Act as once registration is granted, the entire income of the institution would become exempt. The said view, in the light of precedents referred above is wholly opposed to law. Under section 12AA of the Act, the Commissioner is entitled to see that whether the objects are charitable in nature, which term has been well defined in the Act and also to see whether the activities are genuine or not. The genuineness of activities would mean to see that activities are not camouflage, bogus, artificial and whether these are in accordance with the objects of the institution. The scope of enquiry does not extend beyond that point.

Exemption under Section 11 of IT Act can be availed by institutions which are genuinely engaged in 'charitable activities’. However, benefit of section 11 of IT Act is subject to application of income for charitable activities and the Assessing Officer is well entitled to see whether such application has been made and other conditions of Section 11 of IT Act have been complied. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the order under appeal is unsustainable and thus reversed. The Learned CIT(E) is directed to grant registration to the Appellant.

Tags : REGISTRATION   REJECTION   LEGALITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved