Supreme Court: Borrowers Retain Redemption Rights if Balance is Paid After Auction Deadline  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Confirmation of Seizure under Section 37A Impacts Adjudication Proceedings  ||  SC: Blacklisting After Contract Termination is Not Automatic and Needs Independent Review  ||  Grand Venice Fraud Case: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Satinder Singh Bhasin  ||  SC: Senior Employee Cannot Claim Same Lesser Penalty As Subordinate; Bank Manager's Dismissal Upheld  ||  Madras HC: Governor Must Follow Cabinet's Advice on Remission Decisions, Regardless of Personal View  ||  Kerala High Court: Entrepreneurs Must Be Protected From Baseless Protests to Boost Industrial Growth  ||  J&K&L High Court: Second FIR Valid if it Reveals a Broader Conspiracy; 'Test of Sameness' is Key  ||  Supreme Court: Expecting a Minor to Respond to a Public Court Notice is ‘Perverse’  ||  SC: Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Applies to S. 11 Arbitration Act, Barring Fresh Arbiration After Abandonment    

Aryavart Foundation through its President and Ors. Vs. Yashyashvi Rasayan Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. - (National Green Tribunal) (03 Feb 2021)

Companies dealing with hazardous substance must forthwith pay compensation for deaths & injuries to victims as per WCA, 1923 wherever applicable or the principle of restitution wherever applicable

MANU/GT/0025/2021

Environment

Matter arises out of an incident occurred in Bharuch district of Gujarat. The respondent factory is the manufacturer of several hazardous chemicals, including Methanol and Xylane which are hazardous to life and property as mentioned in schedule to the Manufacturer, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemical Rules, 1989. According to applicants, a massive blast took place in the factory on account of a fire in the storage tank of the factory resulting to death of 11 and grievous and simple injuries to 22 and 28 respectively. Along with this damage has also been found in the air and water in the vicinity.

The issue in the matter was what should be the measure of liability of an enterprise which is engaged in a hazardous or inherently dangerous industry if by reason of an accident occurring in such industry, personas die or are injured and whether damage caused to the environment is an important aspect.

NGT directed to conduct safety audits of all such establishments having potential for such accidents and directed the Chief Secretaries of all the States and Union territories to evolve a mechanism to ensure that the companies dealing with hazardous substance must forthwith pay compensation for deaths and injuries to the victims a least as per Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 wherever applicable or the principle of restitution laid down in this regard.

The NGT further affirmed that the pollution control board and District Magistrate must assess the cost of restoration of the environment which should be recovered from the company.

Tags : COMPENSATION   HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved