Supreme Court Urged Railways to Drop the Term Second-Class Passengers  ||  Supreme Court: Employers Cannot Deny Compassionate Appointments Through Delays  ||  Supreme Court Explains How Testimony of a Dead Witness Can be Used Against an Absconding Accused  ||  SC Recommended Amending IBC to Ensure Fair Repayment Protection for MSME Operational Creditors  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Reappreciate Evidence in Certiorari Jurisdiction  ||  SC: Railways are Not Liable Unless Owner-Risk Goods Were Counted or Weighed  ||  SC: Courts and Prosecutors Must Expedite Trials For Jailed Accused  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies that Swear Words and Vulgar Expletives Alone do Not Constitute Obscenity  ||  Supreme Court: Nominated Town Panchayat Members Have No Voting Rights in Council Polls  ||  Delhi High Court Declines Interim Relief to Sonam Wangchuk, Upholds His Hospitalization    

Kerala High Court: To Constitute Abetment, Intentional Aid by Abettor Must be Shown - (05 Jul 2024)

CRIMINAL

Ker. HC has held that to constitute abetment, abettor must be shown to have intentionally aided commission of crime. Mere proof that crime charged could not have been committed without interposition of the alleged abettor is not enough compliance with the requirements of Section 16 of the POCSO Act.

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   ABETMENT   S. 16 OF POCSO ACT   ABETTOR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved