All. HC: Extension of Benefits of Schemes for SC, STs/OBCs to BPL Card Holders is a Matter of Policy  ||  Orissa High Court: Evidence Not Vitiated Merely Because Object is Openly Accessible to Public  ||  Bombay High Court: Desire of Contesting Elections Not Sufficient to Stay Conviction  ||  Tripura HC: Bail Granted to HIV-Positive Accused in NDPS Case  ||  Supreme Court: Cannot Allow Bail Condition Enabling Police to Track Movement of Accused  ||  Delhi High Court: Tesla's Trademark Infringement Suit Against Tesla Power India Referred to Mediation  ||  Kerala High Court: Long Lasting Provocation Can’t be Construed as Sudden Provocation  ||  MTP Cases: Expert Opinion Must be Given by Medical Professional Without Fearing Legal Repercussions  ||  Karnataka High Court: Byju’s Restricted from Allotting Share Till Decision of NCLT  ||  Telangana High Court: 12-Year-Old Rape Victim Allowed to Terminate 26 Weeks Pregnancy    

Patna HC: Oral Evidence Admissible to Prove Contents of Document u/s 92 of IEA - (28 Jun 2024)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Patna High Court has held that to prove the contents of documents under Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, oral evidence could be admissible if there is a claim about misdescription of the property regarding mentioning of wrong plot number.

Tags : PATNA HIGH COURT   S. 92 OF IEA   ORAL EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved