Supreme Court: Detailed Appreciation of Evidence is Not Allowed at the Bail Stage  ||  SC: Defunct Scheme under the Companies Act Cannot Stall the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process  ||  SC: Once Unlawful Assembly is Proved U/S 149 IPC, Individual Role in Fatal Injury is Irrelevant  ||  Supreme Court: Voluntary Confession Qualifies as Substantive Evidence under the Customs Act  ||  Supreme Court: Mere Pendency of Restructuring Arrangements Cannot Stall the CIRP under IBC  ||  Gujarat HC: Unregistered Nikahnama or Missing Records Cannot Bar a Widow From Claiming Pension  ||  Delhi HC: Merely Breaking Up a Relationship Does Not Amount to Instigation For Abetment of Suicide  ||  Madras HC: Doctors Aren’t Regular Staff; Hospitals Cannot Stop Them From Joining Other Hospitals  ||  Supreme Court: Landowners Are Not Liable For Delays Caused by Developers  ||  Supreme Court: Illegality in a Search Does Not Invalidate the Evidence Collected    

Pat. HC: After Commen. of Trial, Amen. of Pleadings Allowed if Required to Arrive at Just Conclusion - (14 Jun 2024)

CIVIL

Patna High Court has observed that in sum and substance, if the amendment is necessary for deciding the real controversy between the parties and for arriving at a just conclusion, such an amendment could be allowed even after the commencement of the trial.

Tags : PATNA HIGH COURT   COMMENCEMENT OF TRIAL   AMENDMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved