Delhi High Court: Providing Email Services Does Not Make Google a Public Functionary  ||  Patna HC: Lying on a Woman Without Any Act Toward Penetration Rules Out Attempted Rape  ||  Delhi High Court: Litigants Cannot Claim a Bench Change as a Right After Roster Changes  ||  Calcutta High Court: Peaceful Protest is a Democratic Right and Cannot Be Treated as an Offence  ||  Delhi High Court: Trial Courts Must Verify an Accused’s Address Before Declaring Absconding  ||  Gujarat High Court: Judicial Officer Cannot Seek HC Judge’s Transfer over Housing Grievance  ||  Delhi High Court Orders 125 Websites Using Jio Trademark for Lottery and Gaming to Be Suspended  ||  MP High Court Strikes Down 27% OBC Quota, Restores Reservation to 14%  ||  Supreme Court: Hindu Widow’s Limited Estate Became Absolute under Succession Act  ||  Supreme Court: Prima Facie Arbitration Agreement Requires Referral to Arbitration    

All. HC: Inconsistency in Bail Orders Having Similar Facts Undermine Public Confidence in Judiciary - (06 Jun 2024)

CRIMINAL

All. HC has observed that when courts grant bail to one accused and deny it to another under similar circumstances without providing clear justifications for disparity, it creates an impression of unpredictability. Such practices can lead to uncertainty and undermine public confidence in judiciary.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   PUBLIC CONFIDENCE   BAIL ORDERS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved