Kerala HC: Applications under the Muslim Women’s Divorce Act Have a 3-Year Limitation Period  ||  Supreme Court: Property Transferred Before Filing a Suit Cannot be Attached under Order 38 Rule 5  ||  Supreme Court: No Review or Appeal is Maintainable Against an Order Appointing an Arbitrator  ||  SC: Terminated Contract is Not a Corporate Debtor’s Asset and a Moratorium Cannot Revive it  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaints Must be Filed at the Payee’s Home Branch under S.142(2)(A)  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Cannot be Granted Solely on Parity; Accused’s Specific Role Must be Assessed  ||  Kerala HC Upholds Life Terms For Five, Acquits Two in Renjith Johnson Murder, Says TIP Not Needed  ||  Kerala HC Orders Emergency Electric Fencing at Tribal School to Address Rising Wildlife Conflict  ||  Madras HC: Arbitrator Can’t Pierce Corporate Veil to Bind Non-Signatory and Partly Sets Aside Award  ||  Calcutta HC: Post-Award Claim For Municipal Tax Reimbursement is Not Maintainable under Section 9    

All. HC: Inconsistency in Bail Orders Having Similar Facts Undermine Public Confidence in Judiciary - (06 Jun 2024)

CRIMINAL

All. HC has observed that when courts grant bail to one accused and deny it to another under similar circumstances without providing clear justifications for disparity, it creates an impression of unpredictability. Such practices can lead to uncertainty and undermine public confidence in judiciary.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   PUBLIC CONFIDENCE   BAIL ORDERS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved