Delhi HC: Workman Cannot Claim Section 17(B) of the ID Act Wages after Reaching Superannuation Age  ||  Allahabad HC: Caste by Birth Remains Unchanged Despite Conversion or Inter-Caste Marriage  ||  Delhi High Court: Tweeting Corruption Allegations Against Employer Can Constitute Misconduct  ||  Delhi High Court: State Gratuity Authorities Lack Jurisdiction over Multi-State Establishments  ||  Kerala High Court: Arrest Grounds Need Not Mention Contraband Quantity When No Seizure is Made  ||  SC: Silence During Investigation Does Not Ipso Facto Mean Non-Cooperation to Deny Bail  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Re-Examine Answer Keys Even in Judicial Service Exams  ||  SC: Central Government Employees under CCS Rules are Not Covered by the Payment of Gratuity Act  ||  Supreme Court Holds CrPC Principles on Discharge and Framing of Charges Continue under BNSS  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Must Independently Assess SC/ST Act Charges in Section 14A Appeals    

All. HC: Inconsistency in Bail Orders Having Similar Facts Undermine Public Confidence in Judiciary - (06 Jun 2024)

CRIMINAL

All. HC has observed that when courts grant bail to one accused and deny it to another under similar circumstances without providing clear justifications for disparity, it creates an impression of unpredictability. Such practices can lead to uncertainty and undermine public confidence in judiciary.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   PUBLIC CONFIDENCE   BAIL ORDERS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved