SC: Omitted Relief Barred Despite Liberty to File Fresh Suit under Order 23  ||  SC: Custodial Confession Alone Cannot Justify Preventive Detention  ||  SC: Failure to Pay Balance Sale Amount Can Lead to EMD Forfeiture under Auction Terms  ||  Gujarat HC: CIC Cannot Order Suo Motu Disclosure of PM Modi’s Degree under RTI Act  ||  MP HC: FIR Cannot Be Quashed Merely for Not Specifying Accused’s Role  ||  MP HC: Joint Family Status Alone Does Not Establish Existence of Joint Family Funds  ||  MP High Court Directs State Bar Council to Frame Stipend Guidelines for Junior Advocates  ||  Allahabad High Court: Hookah Bars cannot Operate in UP; Clean Air Prevails over Trade  ||  P&H HC: High Court’s Inherent Powers Cannot Be Used to Entertain a Second Revision  ||  Delhi HC: Magistrate Must Examine Complainant, Hear Accused Before Taking Cognisance    

Raj. HC: Impermissible for Mag. & ASJ to Take Cognizance Against Same Accused for Diff. Offences - (25 Apr 2024)

CRIMINAL

Raj HC has held that a conjoint reading of Section 193 and 209 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 would make it clear that situation wherein part cognizance has been taken by the Magistrate and part cognizance has been taken by the Additional Sessions Judge cannot be held to be legally permissible.

Tags : RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT   SECTION 193 OF CRPC   SECTION 209 OF CRPC  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved