Supreme Court: Landowners Are Not Liable For Delays Caused by Developers  ||  Supreme Court: Illegality in a Search Does Not Invalidate the Evidence Collected  ||  Supreme Court: Insurer Not Liable For Penalty on Employer Over Delayed Compensation  ||  Karnataka High Court: No Corruption Case Without Proof Of Bribe Demand Or Acceptance  ||  Allahabad HC: Right To Choose Partner is Constitutional; UP Law Doesn't Bar Interfaith Unions  ||  J&K & L High Court: Fair Compensation to Land Losers Must Reflect Road Access And Location Benefits  ||  P&H HC: Full-Time Law Officers Aren’t Contractual and Are Entitled to Medical Benefits and Leaves  ||  MP HC: Wife’s Convenience Not Paramount; VC Facility or Commute Compensation Allowed  ||  Kerala HC: Labour Court Can Extend Time to Comply With Award Even After Enforceability under ID Act  ||  SC: Drafting Confusing Arbitration Clauses Causing Unnecessary Litigation is Professional Misconduct    

Supreme Court Explains The Principles of Adverse Possession - (15 Feb 2024)

PROPERTY

Supreme Court while stating that a person pleading adverse possession has no equities in his favor because seeking such possession is attempting to defeat the true owner's rights, has explained some important factors that the person claiming adverse possession must show.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ADVERSE POSSESSION   OWNER'S RIGHTS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved