SC: For Granting Environmental Clearance, Valid DSR a Mandatory Prerequisite  ||  NCLAT: Under IBC there is No Provision Mandating RP to Share Valuation Report  ||  NCLAT: NCLT/NCLAT Cannot Adjudicate Employment Contract Disputes Under IBC  ||  NCLAT: Can’t Reject App. for Approval of RP Solely on Basis of Withdrawal of Consent by CoC Members  ||  J&K HC: S. 37 of NDPS Act Comes Into Play When Bail of Accused is Being Considered on Merits  ||  Delhi HC: In National Capital, Permission for Felling of More Trees to be Supervised by CEC  ||  Registrar General of P&H HC Warns of Contempt in Case of Recording of Court Proceedings  ||  SC: States to Identify Laws Discriminating Against Persons Affected with Leprosy  ||  SC: Recommendations Made by SC Collegium for Judge Appointments to be Cleared Expeditiously  ||  SC: Where Serviceman Discharged from duty by Authority Onus of Proving Disability Lies on Authority    

JKL HC: Subjective Satisfaction of Detaining Authority Doesn’t Deprive Court to Review its Orders - (25 Aug 2023)

CRIMINAL

Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that although subjective satisfaction cannot be interfered normally by the court but at the same time it does not deprive the court to look into the satisfaction recorded by the detaining authority.

Tags : JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT   DETAINING AUTHORITY   SUBJECTIVE SATISFACTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved