Supreme Court: Uncrystallized Contractual Damages Not an Operational Debt under Section 9 IBC  ||  Supreme Court: Interest Accrued in Suspense Account After NPA Classification is Recoverable as Debt  ||  Supreme Court: S.69 GST Arrest Order with “Reasons to Believe” Must Precede Arrest  ||  Supreme Court: Winding-Up Proceedings Period Cannot be Excluded under Section 14 Limitation Act  ||  Supreme Court: Separate Appeals Unnecessary Against Common Judgment on Suit and Counterclaim  ||  Supreme Court: Unsuccessful Party Can Seek Post-Award Section 9 Relief in Exceptional Cases  ||  Delhi HC Rejects Black Money Act Challenge, Imposes Rs. 60,000 Costs over Prosecution Avoidance  ||  Delhi HC Affirms Teacher's POCSO Conviction, Urges Schools to Encourage Children to Speak Up  ||  Kerala HC: NGO Funding Peaceful Protests Can't Justify FCRA Renewal Denial  ||  Delhi HC: Courts Cannot Judge Sufficiency of Material For Issuing Look Out Circular    

Kerala HC: State Can’t Deny Responsibility in Guise of Limitation Period - (03 Mar 2023)

CIVIL

Kerala High Court while observing that when a citizen is engaged by Government to carry out activities, it had duty to reward person as per the contract even without asking for it, has held that state can’t avoid its obligation to compensate for dues owed by invoking ground of limitation.

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   LIMITATION PERIOD   COMPENSATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved