Supreme Court: Detailed Appreciation of Evidence is Not Allowed at the Bail Stage  ||  SC: Defunct Scheme under the Companies Act Cannot Stall the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process  ||  SC: Once Unlawful Assembly is Proved U/S 149 IPC, Individual Role in Fatal Injury is Irrelevant  ||  Supreme Court: Voluntary Confession Qualifies as Substantive Evidence under the Customs Act  ||  Supreme Court: Mere Pendency of Restructuring Arrangements Cannot Stall the CIRP under IBC  ||  Gujarat HC: Unregistered Nikahnama or Missing Records Cannot Bar a Widow From Claiming Pension  ||  Delhi HC: Merely Breaking Up a Relationship Does Not Amount to Instigation For Abetment of Suicide  ||  Madras HC: Doctors Aren’t Regular Staff; Hospitals Cannot Stop Them From Joining Other Hospitals  ||  Supreme Court: Landowners Are Not Liable For Delays Caused by Developers  ||  Supreme Court: Illegality in a Search Does Not Invalidate the Evidence Collected    

Guj. HC: Communication B/W Govt. Pleader and State Regarding Proceeding Outside Scope of RTI - (16 Feb 2023)

RIGHT TO INFORMATION

Gujarat High Court has observed that Professional correspondence between government advocate and various offices of the State regarding a matter in which he had appeared for the petitioning party, can't be disclosed under Right to Information Act, 2005.

Tags : GUJARAT HIGH COURT   RIGHT TO INFORMATION   PROFESSIONAL CORRESPONDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved