Supreme Court: Belated Jurisdictional Challenge Impermissible After Participation in Arbitration  ||  Supreme Court: Failure to Prove Specific Overt Acts of Each Unlawful Assembly Member Not Fatal  ||  Supreme Court: Parental Salary Alone Cannot Determine OBC Creamy Layer Status  ||  SC: Direct Recruits’ Seniority Begins From Initial Appointment, Not Completion of Probation  ||  Supreme Court: Police Recruitment Can be Denied Only if Acquittal in Heinous Crime Was on Doubt  ||  J&K & Ladakh High Court: Section 479 BNSS Does Not Grant Automatic Bail After Detention Period  ||  Bombay High Court: Trial Vitiated if Forensic Experts Whose Reports are Relied Upon are Not Examined  ||  J&K & Ladakh HC: Mutation Attested in Violation of Agrarian Reforms Act Can be Reviewed in Revision  ||  Gujarat High Court: Power Company Cannot Allege Deceased’s Negligence in Hanging Live Wire Death  ||  Delhi High Court Denies Lifting Stay on Kent RO’s Sale of Fans under the KENT Trademark    

Guj. HC: Communication B/W Govt. Pleader and State Regarding Proceeding Outside Scope of RTI - (16 Feb 2023)

RIGHT TO INFORMATION

Gujarat High Court has observed that Professional correspondence between government advocate and various offices of the State regarding a matter in which he had appeared for the petitioning party, can't be disclosed under Right to Information Act, 2005.

Tags : GUJARAT HIGH COURT   RIGHT TO INFORMATION   PROFESSIONAL CORRESPONDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved