SC: Valuation Report is Not Mandatory For Share Capital Reduction U/S 66 Companies Act  ||  SC: NCLAT Order Remains Valid Even if the Bench Has a Majority of Technical Members  ||  SC: Plaintiff Who Approaches the Court with Unclean Hands Cannot be Granted Specific Performance  ||  SC: Co-Operative Society’s Multi-State Status Depends on its Objectives, Not Member Distribution  ||  SC: Government Cannot Avoid Responsibility as Data Shows COVID Vaccines Caused Some Deaths  ||  J&K&L HC: Employer Can Adjust Pay/Pension for Dual Benefits, But Not Recover From Group C&D Staff  ||  Bom HC: Kolhapur Circuit Bench Notification Doesn’t Automatically Divest Principal Seat Jurisdiction  ||  Madras HC: Take Action Against Collectors and Police if They Fail to Maintain an Orderly System  ||  J&K&L High Court: Cheque Bounce Case Can't be Dismissed Before Accused is Served  ||  Cal HC: Delay in FIR is Not Fatal in Motor Accident Claims When Families Rush Victims to Hospital    

SC: Additional Accused Can’t be Impleaded After Expiry of Limitation Period U/S 142 of NI Act - (18 Nov 2022)

BANKING

Supreme Court has held that impleadment of additional accused subsequent to the filing of a cheque bounce complaint is not permissible once limitation prescribed for taking cognizance of the offence under Section 142 of Negotiable Instruments (NI) Act has expired.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   CHEQUE BOUNCE   LIMITATION   IMPLEADMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved