J&K&L High Court: Transfer Guidelines are Not Binding and Cannot Limit an Employer’s Transfer Powers  ||  Calcutta High Court: Procedural Delays Cannot Deny a Person’s Right to Adopt  ||  J&K&L HC: Pardoned Approver under Section 343 BNSS Need Not Stay in Custody Till Trial Ends  ||  J&K&L HC: Accused Cannot Demand Charges under a Preferred Law When Acts Fall under Multiple Statutes  ||  J&K&L HC: Accused Cannot Demand Charges under a Preferred Law When Acts Fall under Multiple Statutes  ||  Allahabad HC: Civil Imprisonment For Default Does Not Absolve a Husband’s Duty to Pay Maintenance  ||  Supreme Court: SC Status Applies Only to Hindus, Sikhs, and Buddhists, and is Lost on Conversion  ||  Supreme Court: Post-Moratorium, Creditors Cannot Adjust Pre-CIRP Dues From Prior Deposits  ||  Supreme Court: CoC’s Commercial Wisdom Does Not Shield All its Decisions From Judicial Scrutiny  ||  SC Flags Systemic Bias in Granting Permanent Commission to Women Officers in Armed Forces    

SC: High Courts Shouldn’t Writ Petitions Filed Bypassing Statutory Alternative Remedies - (23 Sep 2022)

CIVIL

Supreme Court has held that High Courts should refrain from excercising writ jurisdiction where there is an alternate remedy available. When there is an alternate remedy available, judicial prudence demands that the court refrains from exercising its jurisdiction under constitutional provisions.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   WRIT JURISDICTION   ALTERNATIVE REMEDY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved