NCLAT: Existence of Financial Debt Essential for Initiating Proceedings under Section 7 of IBC  ||  J&K HC: Denying Benefits of Reservation in Promotion in UT of J&K is against Concept of Equality  ||  Delhi HC: Can Grant Arbitral Award on the Basis of Evidentiary Admissions  ||  Ker. HC: Sexual Offences Against Children and Women are on the Increase  ||  Gujarat High Court, Constitutional Validity, State Government  ||  Guj. HC: State to Take Stand on Challenge to Gujarat Local Authorities Laws (Amendment) Act 2023  ||  J&K HC: Can’t Maintain Suit for Damages for Wrongful Dismissal Unless Termination Declared Wrongful  ||  Cal HC: To Prove Fraud in Arbitral Award, Important to Demonstrate Unethical Behaviour of Arbitrator  ||  J&K HC: Failure of Trial Court to Frame Issue of Maintainability Doesn’t Limit Powers of Appellate Co  ||  SC Discharges Persons Accused of Not Providing Safety Equipment to their Employees    

SC: High Courts Shouldn’t Writ Petitions Filed Bypassing Statutory Alternative Remedies - (23 Sep 2022)

CIVIL

Supreme Court has held that High Courts should refrain from excercising writ jurisdiction where there is an alternate remedy available. When there is an alternate remedy available, judicial prudence demands that the court refrains from exercising its jurisdiction under constitutional provisions.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   WRIT JURISDICTION   ALTERNATIVE REMEDY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved