Supreme Court: Detailed Appreciation of Evidence is Not Allowed at the Bail Stage  ||  SC: Defunct Scheme under the Companies Act Cannot Stall the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process  ||  SC: Once Unlawful Assembly is Proved U/S 149 IPC, Individual Role in Fatal Injury is Irrelevant  ||  Supreme Court: Voluntary Confession Qualifies as Substantive Evidence under the Customs Act  ||  Supreme Court: Mere Pendency of Restructuring Arrangements Cannot Stall the CIRP under IBC  ||  Gujarat HC: Unregistered Nikahnama or Missing Records Cannot Bar a Widow From Claiming Pension  ||  Delhi HC: Merely Breaking Up a Relationship Does Not Amount to Instigation For Abetment of Suicide  ||  Madras HC: Doctors Aren’t Regular Staff; Hospitals Cannot Stop Them From Joining Other Hospitals  ||  Supreme Court: Landowners Are Not Liable For Delays Caused by Developers  ||  Supreme Court: Illegality in a Search Does Not Invalidate the Evidence Collected    

CESTAT: Goods Improperly Imported are Liable for Confiscation U/s 111 and 112 of Customs Act - (27 May 2022)

CUSTOMS

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai has held that Sections 111 and 112 of Customs Act are attracted only when goods are improperly imported.

Tags : CESTAT   CONFISCATION   IMPORTED GOODS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved