SC: Suit Alleging Coercion or Undue Influence Cannot be Rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC  ||  Cal HC: Once ED Attachment is Confirmed, Challenge Becomes Academic; PMLA Remedy Must be Pursued  ||  MP HC: Pen-Drive Evidence Cannot be Introduced At a Late Trial Stage Without Proof or Relevance  ||  Calcutta HC: Employee Can't be Stopped From Joining Rival Post-Resignation; Trade Secrets Protected  ||  Calcutta HC: Banks Must Provide Forensic Audit Report Before Calling an Account Fraudulent  ||  Del HC: Woman Cannot Demand Re-Entry to Abandoned Matrimonial Home if Alternate Accommodation Exists  ||  Calcutta HC: Land Acquisition For Industrial Park is Public Purpose; Leasing to Industry is Valid  ||  Patna HC: PwD Recruitment Must Comply With RPwD Act; Executive Resolutions Cannot Override the Law  ||  Madras HC: Individuals Facing Criminal Trial Must Get Court Permission Even to Renew Passports  ||  Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists    

NCLT, Chennai: No Conflict Among Prohibition of Benami Property Transaction Act and IBC, 2016 - (06 May 2022)

COMPANY

National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai has ruled that there is no conflict between the Prohibition of Benami Property Transaction Act, 1988 and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 relating to the attachment of property, as both of them are special Acts.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL   PROHIBITION OF BENAMI PROPERTY TRANSACTION ACT   1988   INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE   2016   ATTACHMENT OF PROPERTY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved