Delhi High Court Denies Lifting Stay on Kent RO’s Sale of Fans under the KENT Trademark  ||  Sikkim HC: Non-Disclosure of Minor Cases With Acquittal Should Not Automatically Trigger Termination  ||  SC Explains What Constitutes ‘Best Interests’ of Patient in Vegetative State for Passive Euthanasia  ||  Supreme Court: Overzealous Investigation and Cases Based on Public Perception Can Harm Prosecution  ||  SC: Public Servant Convicted of Bribery Cannot Seek Acquittal Merely Due to Co-Accused’s Acquittal  ||  Supreme Court: Call Detail Records Require Section 65B Evidence Act Certificate to be Admissible  ||  SC: Valuation Report is Not Mandatory For Share Capital Reduction U/S 66 Companies Act  ||  SC: NCLAT Order Remains Valid Even if the Bench Has a Majority of Technical Members  ||  SC: Plaintiff Who Approaches the Court with Unclean Hands Cannot be Granted Specific Performance  ||  SC: Co-Operative Society’s Multi-State Status Depends on its Objectives, Not Member Distribution    

P&H HC: Notice to Employer Not Mandatory Before Making Reference to Adjudicatory Mechanism - (22 Apr 2022)

CIVIL

Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that the employer cannot claim any hearing before making of the reference by the appropriate government under Section 17(2) of the Working Journalists and Other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of service) And Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 Act.

Tags : PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT   WORKING JOURNALISTS AND OTHER NEWSPAPER EMPLOYEES (CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved