Cal HC: Enterprise Contracting with Govt Recognised Concessionaire Can be Granted Benefit of S. 80IA  ||  SC: There Should be Reservation for Women in posts of Delhi High Court Bar Association  ||  SC: Relevant to Examine Whether Accused is Aware of Ingredients of Offence for Which He Is Convicted  ||  Supreme Court Asks IT Department, CBDT to Upgrade its Software  ||  Delhi HC Withdraws Rule Restricting Censure of Police Officers by Judicial Officers  ||  SC: Cases of Clean Acquittal of Accused May Give Rise to a Claim for Compensation  ||  Bom. HC: Division Bench Declares Amendment to IT Rules, 2021 as Unconstitutional  ||  Patna HC: Not Disclosing Reasons for Confiscating Goods is Violative of Article 14 of COI  ||  Allahabad High Court: Once a Special Act Holds the Field, Provisions of General Law Would Not Apply  ||  Gauhati High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction Even in Absence of Medical Evidence    

SC: Can’t Set Aside Conviction if Statement of Accused Not Used for Evidence While Cross-Examination - (24 May 2024)

CRIMINAL

SC has observed that the conviction of an accused cannot be set aside if the accused’s statement recorded under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is not put to use in evidence by the accused in the form of suggestion while conducting the cross-examination the prosecutrix.

Tags :   SUPREME COURT  CROSS-EXAMINATION  S. 313 OF CRPC

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved