Supreme Court: Compassionate Appointees Cannot Later Claim Entitlement to a Higher Post  ||  NCLAT New Delhi: Insolvency Pleas Cannot Be Admitted When Information Utility Records Show a Dispute  ||  NCLAT: Issuing Cheques For Another Entity’s Liabilities Does not Constitute Operational Debt  ||  NCLAT: SEBI Penalties Imposed After Liquidation Begins are Not Admissible as Claims  ||  NCLT Reiterates That an Auction Purchaser is Not Liable For a Corporate Debtor’s Electricity Dues  ||  Delhi HC Upholds Interim Injunction Against 'Power Flex' in Bata’s Trademark Infringement Case  ||  Calcutta High Court: Mere Presence of Alcohol in Post-Mortem Cannot Bar Compensation to Heirs  ||  Kerala High Court: Review Petition Cannot Be Entertained Against an Order Refusing Arbitration  ||  J&K High Court: Umadevi Judgment Does not Justify Perpetual Temporary Employment  ||  SC: Public Premises Act Prevails over State Rent Laws For Evicting Unauthorised Occupants    

Supreme Court: Constitutionality of Minimum Mark Criteria for Interview Upheld - (07 May 2024)

SERVICE

SC has upheld the constitutionality of rules that require a candidate to fulfill minimum mark criteria in the viva voce test for appointment to District Judiciary in States of Bihar and Gujarat and stated that while the written exam measures knowledge, the interview reveals character and capability.

Tags :   SUPREME COURT  MINIMUM MARK CRITERIA  DISTRICT JUDICIARY

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved